Four years ago, Florence Jessup spent a small fortune to
start her Hillsboro farm, Artisan Organics: more than $70,000 from an
inheritance and her retirement accounts.
Since
then, Jessup, farming on rented land, has joined the Portland area’s
burgeoning local food movement—selling at three farmers markets and
through community-supported agriculture, the subscription-based buying
system where consumers purchase shares of local crops.
If she hadn’t had the cash, Jessup says, she could never have got her 6-acre operation up and running.
“What does this mean
for the future of food in the United States when the only people who can
afford to grow it [on small farms] are already retired or
trustafarians?” Jessup asks. “That’s a very limited population.”
In the Portland area,
the popularity of farmers markets and local agriculture continues to
grow, fueled by small-scale farms that emphasize sustainability.
But taxpayers may soon be asked to step up and help out this local food base.
Federal support for
agriculture nationwide is nothing new, with multibillion-dollar annual
subsidies for large growers of corn, soybeans, wheat, rice and cotton.
The largest farms get the lion’s share of government payments.
The area’s small farming operations now say they want in as well.
Small farms are vital
to the sustainable local food system that urban Oregonians celebrate
every week by crowding into highly priced farmers markets.
The
Oregon Farmers’ Markets Association estimates the number of farmers
markets in the state has grown from 12 to 158 since 1987. For the first
time, the Portland and Hollywood farmers markets will have winter
markets. (The former is open Saturdays through February, the latter on
the first and third Saturdays of each month through April.)
But advocates say this trend is not financially sustainable without state help.
John Eveland says his
family maxed out its credit cards and needed cash it received from an
insurance settlement following an auto accident to keep Gathering
Together Farm in Philomath 23 years ago. It took more than two
decades—and hitting $750,000 in annual sales—before the family could
qualify for credit from banks.
“There have to be better ways to help farmers access the capital they need,” says Jared Gardner of Oregon Banks Local.
The push for
assistance to small-scale farming comes as state lawmakers draft
legislation for next month’s session to create the Oregon Growth Board,
an entity with the power to invest in businesses and projects without
having to wait for the Legislature.
The plan is aimed at
helping businesses in general, but advocates of small, family farmers
want it to contain strong language supportive of that group.
Steve Hughes, state
director of the Oregon Working Families Party, says his organization is
eager to avoid legislation aimed at luring that “one big company”
promising jobs with millions in tax giveaways.
There doesn’t seem to
be much enthusiasm at the state’s Department of Agriculture. Brent
Searle, special assistant to the department’s director, says federal
programs are already available.
The state has 38,500
farms—of those, about 7 percent produce 85 percent of Oregon’s
agricultural output. The majority of the remaining farms are often those
that sell produce at farmers markets, and most of them—often organic
operations—have sales of less than $10,000 a year.
Other states do far more to help small-scale farming.
Two years ago,
Massachusetts responded to the growing popularity of farmers markets and
community-supported agriculture by providing up to $10,000 in matching
grants for new farmers even if they don’t own the land.
Massachusetts also
provides grants up to $100,000 for farmers who keep their land in
production. Program director Craig Richov says the state assists 20 to
24 farms annually, and only a handful have failed since the program
started 15 years ago.
“If you had banks
working with businesses and providing loans, and 99.5 percent were
successful, you would be a pretty good banker,” Richov says.
Chances of gaining
any new subsidies this year for Oregon small-scale farming are slim,
says Rep. Brian Clem (D-Salem), who co-chairs the House Agriculture and
Natural Resources Committee.
But Clem says that
could change if small-scale farming advocates can mobilize. Last year,
he sponsored House Bill 2336, which exempts small-scale farmers from
food-inspection laws when selling their fruits, vegetables and other
produce. So many constituents wrote in support, he says, that many
lawmakers told him, “I’m not voting against that.” The bill passed.
The bottom line, advocates say, is that the state should subsidize small farms as the feds subsidize large ones.
“We have a long
history of supporting agriculture because it’s our food,” Hughes says.
If we simply leave agriculture to the whims of the free market, we’d
probably be “eating rations of genetically modified corn chips from
Monsanto” every day.
Great, they want my tax dollars to subsidize rich people's finicky eating habits.
Better than our tax dollars going to subsidize some multi-billion dollar multi-national company that has tons of profit anyhow (i.e. Monsanto, etc.).
I don't have much money, but I care about my family's health - and I'd rather give my money to a hard-working neighbor than some multinational crap producer who whisks the money off to some island tax haven rather than spending it locally.
Farms in Oregon all receive a generous subsidy. Their property tax is not based on the value of their farms, but on some arcane calculation that allows them to pay much lower property taxes than the rest of us.
This is exactly the direction we should be going in. This is not the food for the finicky but the concerned. As citizens of the planet we need to support not only healthy food but healthy soil. Large scale agriculture has contributed so much to the conditions that undermind a healthy environment that it is hard to consider them as the only continually viable source for our food supply. Sustainable agriculture must be supported lest the weight of its future falls on the few that have the heart, funds and mind to offer a solution. That we turn the effort over to them entirely is both unfair and narrow minded. We, not them, (or not small farmers alone)should be part of the one of the most exciting solutions around. Thank you for this article, I hope we can come together to support them. For those interested they should check out our local Friends of Family Farmers non profit that works tirelessly to this end.
I find it very interesting that we think we need government help to get farms started. We started a farm in Oregon with our own money and it was MUCH less than the $70,000 quoted in this story. We started with 300 laying hens washing eggs in our kitchen sink and now, two years later, have sales that qualify us as a "medium scale" farm in Oregon. You don't need $70,000 to start a farm and you don't need loans or government subsidies to start a farm. What could the government do to help my farm and other local farms? Stop subsidizing ALL farms and let us compete on our own merits. Get out of our way, let us sell and advertise high quality fresh milk, let us butcher our own artisan steers, chicken, pork, lamb, goats and more. Instead of asking the government for more involvement in our lives as farmers I think we should be doing the exact opposite.
Lending to small farmers with state money that is now getting invested out of state is not really a subsidy. Certainly nothing like federal subsidies for huge agribusinesses where none of the owners sweat a drop.