Early this month, New Seasons Market announced plans to
build its 13th store on a vacant lot in North Portland’s Eliot
neighborhood.
That’s good news for the listless economy and the upscale grocery chain, which employs about 2,000 people.
It’s even better news
for Eileen Brady, the Portland mayoral candidate who has touted her
role as a “co-founder” of New Seasons as her primary qualification for
the top job at City Hall.
“I know what it’s
like to have thousands of people depend on you for a paycheck to support
their families,” she said in a speech last year.
Brady’s campaign
website highlights the grocery chain’s story, and she does as well on
the campaign trail, talking about how she “and her husband, along with
two other families and many friends, co-found[ed] the Portland-based
business” in 1999.
It’s understandable
why Brady would make her connection to New Seasons the centerpiece of
her campaign. Since it opened in 2000, New Seasons has joined Powell’s
Books and Stumptown Coffee on the short list of businesses that help
define Portland.
“She always
identifies herself as a New Seasons founder,” says Jim Moore, a
political science professor at Pacific University in Forest Grove.
“She’s relying a lot on the New Seasons brand because it’s popular, has
spread throughout the city, and is seen as a local entity that has done
well and reinvests in the community.”
Brady supporters
haven’t missed the message. At a Brady campaign rally in December,
MergerTech CEO Nitin Khanna said she will make City Hall a clean,
inviting and well-run place, “just like New Seasons.”
But previously
unreported public documents raise questions about Brady’s actual role in
the company, and whether her claim to be a “co-founder” has any
substantive meaning.
The documents provide details on the finances of a large, privately held company.
In the context of the
2012 mayoral race, however, the ownership stakes the documents reveal
are more notable for what they don’t contain:
The name Eileen Brady.
“Co-founder” is a
term of art, not a legal definition. It is the title Brady provides for
her time at New Seasons on her LinkedIn résumé. In a previous version,
Brady described herself as a “founding co-owner.”
In an interview Jan.
16 at their Mount Tabor home, Brady and her husband, former New Seasons
CEO Brian Rohter, addressed exactly what role Brady played in the
company.
When pressed, Brady acknowledged she was never an employee, officer or director of New Seasons.
“I was never on the payroll,” she said.
She never had an office or a phone number there, nor was she ever paid for any of the time she says she put in.
During the time New Seasons was starting up, Brady held full-time, paying jobs with other organizations.
Nevertheless, Brady
insists she played a major role in creating and marketing the New
Seasons brand and overseeing a host of important tasks.
Eileen Brady discusses her role in starting up New Seasons in an interview from last year.
You printed what Weiner gave you. Well done WW. Well done.
I don't understand why she thinks we should vote for her, she has no qualifications & zero experience. New Seasons co-founder or not (which the article makes clear she was not), why in the world would anyone vote for her? Because she has the richest friends who have donated to her campaign?
In the past week she's lied about asking Bob Packwood & his wife for money & she says different things about the columbia river crossing depending on who she's talking to.
Faithful WW readers will of course be waiting breathlessly for your exposes on your boy Jeff Smith. This Brady story is so much ado about nothing.
What strikes me moast about Eileen Brady is that she's new to politics and doesn't have a record we the public can judge her by. We only have her past experience. And on that front, if this story is any indication, we don't know who the real Eileen Brady is, but this version seems like a fraud.
Exactly what we don't need right now! Semantics? Come on. This leaves a very bad taste in my mouth!
Sounds like a healthy helping of double talk.