Tuesday, February 14

Sam Adams is on Yelp

News The other day I noticed a curious tweet from our venerable mayor's Twitter account:Yes, Sam is tweet... More

Feb 13, 2012 01:20 pm by RUTH BROWN  | Comments 1
 

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 4
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 1
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 4
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · Rogue of the Week · Kate Brown And Ron Bersin
January 14th, 2009 WW Editorial Staff | Rogue of the Week
 

Kate Brown And Ron Bersin

Keep the revolving door closed.

24 Comments
     
Tags:

Nothing attracts the Rogue Desk’s attention like a whiff of hypocrisy.

In 2007, the Legislature passed a sweeping ethics measure, Senate Bill 10, aimed at limiting lobbyists’ influence in Salem. The bill slashed limits on how much lobbyists could spend on meals for legislators, as well as cut entertaining and travel freebies.

And SB 10 imposed a strict “revolving door” limitation that prohibited ex-lawmakers from lobbying ex-colleagues for two years after leaving the Legislature.

This week’s Rogue, former Senate Majority Leader Kate Brown, recently sworn in as Oregon’s secretary of state, wrote the bill; her partner in Rogue-dom, Ethics Commission director Ron Bersin, has now decided to exempt her from it.

On Jan. 8, Bersin issued a puzzling opinion [PDF] that allows lobbying by Brown as well as former Senate colleagues Brad Avakian, the Bureau of Labor and Industries commissioner; and Ben Westlund, new state treasurer.

Bersin says because those elected officials aren’t paid for lobbying like a contract lobbyist, the statute written by Brown doesn’t apply to them.

That’s a stretch. The ex-lawmakers will use their legislative contacts to improve the fortunes of their new offices—exactly what the revolving door statute aims to prevent.

Bersin’s opinion treats these ex-lawmakers better than anybody else with business before the Legislature. And that is unfair.

“Public agencies aren’t supposed to have any more influence on legislation than anyone else,” says former legislative counsel Greg Chaimov, who as a private lawyer has sued to overturn parts of SB 10. “DEQ shouldn’t have any greater influence than Sierra Club or [the] Forest Industries Council.”

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
01.14.2009 at 05:53 Reply
This is completely out of line. If state officers *didn't* communicate with legislators, we would be upset.

 

01.14.2009 at 07:10 Reply
Wow. Did anyone give this Rogue column any thought before publishing it?

You're saying that AG Kroger should be able to lobby, but SoS Brown shouldn't because her last job was as a legislator?

That's illogical. Should Brown be forced to send underlings to testify and lobby on issues ranging from elections to the administration of state office buildings on her behalf? I don't think that's why people elected her. I think we elected her to do the job.

 

01.14.2009 at 08:33 Reply
So, if a legislator gets elected Governor, he or she can't talk to legislators and push for their agenda? Would the State of the State address be considered illegal?

Utter nonsense.

 

01.14.2009 at 12:33 Reply
Seriously? You're criticizing the Ethics Commissioner for his opinion that Senate Bill 10 allows statewide officials to do their jobs? And you're roping in Secretary of State Brown, who didn't issue the opinion but pushed for better ethics legislation?

I suppose the legislature could create clarifying legislation, but that seems like a terrible waste of taxpayer dollars.

 

01.14.2009 at 01:58 Reply
She is a statewide publicly elected official being paid by public funds to perform duties for the benefit of Oregonians. Seems like a long stretch to refer to her as a lobbyist.

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close