Tuesday, February 14

A Lovers' Guide to Tonight's Blazers/Wizards Game: An Almost Live Special Report

News I will not be live-blogging tonight's Blazers/Wizards Valentine's Day matchup (too busy being romant... More

Feb 14, 2012 05:05 pm by CASEY JARMAN  | Comments 0
 

Valentine's Day in the Naked City: Couple Arrested After Sex Role-Playing in Grocery Parking Lot

News A Northeast Portland couple took sex-in-a-car to new places in celebration of Valentine’s Day, muc... More

Feb 14, 2012 03:55 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 0
 

Washington State Senate Approves CRC Tolls

News A big step to raising money for the $3.5 billion Columbia River Crossing cleared its first vote Tues... More

Feb 14, 2012 01:03 pm by WW Staff  | Comments 0
 

Sam Adams is on Yelp

News The other day I noticed a curious tweet from our venerable mayor's Twitter account:Yes, Sam is tweet... More

Feb 13, 2012 01:20 pm by RUTH BROWN  | Comments 4
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · News · Green Fee
May 20th, 2009 Shawn O'bryant | News
 

Green Fee

Will $5 from each PSU Student make the campus any friendlier to the environment?

4 Comments
     
Tags:
PSU: Portland’s Sustainable University? Maybe down the line.
IMAGE: Jennifer Cestnik

Here’s an anomaly in our sustainable city—Portland State University has the lowest possible ranking among colleges for environmental friendliness, according to Princeton’s Review of Green Colleges.

Last week, PSU students took a step that might change their school’s future ranking in the review, which measures colleges’ environment-related policies, practices and academic offerings.

About 72 percent of students voting in a PSU election approved a referendum that creates a $5-per-student-per-term “green fee.”

The fee, which takes effect this fall, will generate about $500,000 annually and will fund projects designed to reduce PSU’s current 44,000 metric tons of annual carbon-dioxide emissions.

“This is an opportunity for us to think globally but invest locally,” says referendum architect Brendan Castricano, a 29-year-old senior who’s majoring in psychology and economics.

The money will initially be used to:

Fund a TriMet/FlexPass subsidy that could result in a $10-to-$15 decrease in three-month passes now costing $175 per student at the school, which is primarily composed of commuters.

Finance a special sustainability projects fund: a student-governed grant program for “sustainable capital projects” such as bike-parking stations, water-bottle refilling stations and acquisition of bikes for a bike-loan program.

Fill a new university position for a conservation and renewable-energy manager that Castricano expects will pay at least $80,000 a year.

Start a “green revolving loan” program similar to what’s been done at other schools nationwide. The loan program is designed to be self-sustaining, with funds loaned at a zero percent interest rate and money from energy savings then reinvested in other projects. The program will target efforts such as lighting efficiency, and water and energy conservation.

Although the fee won strong support among voting students, it’s worth noting that only 3 percent of the university’s 26,321 students voted—the lowest turnout at PSU since 1998.

“Sustainability is good in its ideals, but it is kinda a fad,” says a nonvoter who didn’t know about the election, sophomore physics major Daniel Olivares. “Five bucks is not that much at the end of the day. But how does that change the world?”

Castricano responds that programs like the green revolving loan fund have proven successful at other campuses with startup money.

“The green fee is a great way to plug into that,” Castricano says. “We are doing what we can in our own circle of control.”


FACTS: Other fees PSU students pay each term include a $218 incidental fee for “various student activities” and a $167 health fee.

Harvard University estimates its revolving green loan program saves the university $4 million a year.

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
05.20.2009 at 06:04 Reply
J
$5 doesn't seem like a lot of money - but when you add it in with all of the other insignificant little fees students already pay, it becomes a much larger issue. I support the green-fee, but what about the rest of the (around) $200 students pay in fees each quarter?

 

05.21.2009 at 03:14 Reply
Q
That nonvoter quoted thinks like the entire PSU population minus 800 people. Cynical and uninterested.

 

05.21.2009 at 05:49 Reply
Wweek, I'm disappointed. This article hardly covers both sides of the issue. It's unfortunate that your publication speaks so half-heartedly about an important issue. What an underwhelming piece of writing.

 

05.21.2009 at 07:24 Reply
I am not sure that this fee will take effect at all. I was elected to the Student Fee Committee and I look forward to seeing it all unfold as far as this referendum and whether it's binding. The obvious concern is that, if you read the referedum, the phrasing of the referendum itself said it would save money. I am not sure about you but the way to introduce a change to student fees in the form of a referendum is to say exactly what it does not a guarantee of what it might do. Subsidies for bus passes I can tell you I do not support and I think I speak for a majority of students. The way to get more people in school is not by raising fees to subsidize a few. Just my thoughts.

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close