ALL THAT GLITTERS: The controversy over the Made in Oregon sign involved neon—and money. |
To Portlanders enamored of the “Made in Oregon” sign atop the White Stag building in Old Town, City Commissioner Randy Leonard appeared to be a hero.
On April 8, after much public debate about the fate of the neon sign, Leonard announced a compromise with the University of Oregon, which had the right to change the popular “Made in Oregon” in its 2006 deal with its landlord and the sign’s owner.
Leonard, who opposed the university’s changing the sign on the grounds it would alter an iconic part of Portland’s skyline, had wanted to use eminent domain to condemn the sign. He sought to bring the sign under the City of Portland’s control and block the university from putting its moniker on the west bank of the Willamette. And he proposed changing the message to “Portland, Oregon,” with “City of Roses” below.
Eventually, however, Leonard and the university compromised on a simpler message: “Oregon,” with the words “Portland” and “Old Town” underneath. “The outcome is clear,” Jan Oliver, an associate vice president for the university’s Portland campus, told City Council on April 8. “We are comfortable with it.”
Yet the terms of the deal weren’t at all clear; not to the public, anyway.
WW has learned that while everyone was focused on what the sign would say and how it would say it, another debate—about substance rather than style—bubbled at City Hall in the offices of Leonard and Mayor Sam Adams.
And it might have been an even more important debate, since it involved money at a time when the city was making significant budget cuts: What would the City of Portland give the University of Oregon for relinquishing its neon marketing tool? What would the city do to make the university whole?
The answer, it turns out, is a parking lot. Or, specifically, a city-owned lot that could have generated at least $54,000 a year for Portland’s Bureau of Transportation, which just shed 57 full-time jobs and $5.4 million under Adams’ recently approved 2009-10 budget.
To the university, the 27 spots under the west end of the Burnside Bridge—next to the university’s Portland home in the White Stag building—are worth more than the money the university could generate by subleasing the spaces. (Under the agreement between the school and the city still being finalized, the university will retain the right to rent the parking spots to other tenants of the White Stag building and the university’s new neighbor, Mercy Corps.)
The spots in the parking lot, formerly the site of Saturday Market, are viewed instead by the university as a key component of its safety strategy.
Students entering the building at all hours often use the side entrance under the bridge, since that’s the door that leads to the bike-storage room. In the months leading up to the great sign debate, university officials had expressed concern that they lacked an adequate presence in the sometimes vacant lot next to their building to monitor students’ safety. They wanted to set up a retail store under the bridge to create that vigilance, but for complicated legal reasons they could not do that—unless they also held a lease for the lot.
Adams knew that. And as early as December, the then-mayor-elect mentioned a willingness to help the university gain control of the parking lot, according to the university. It wasn’t until the last minute of the great sign debate, though, that Leonard says he learned of Adams’ separate negotiations with the university. “You’re giving away something for nothing,” Leonard says he told Adams then.
Now included in the proposed lease is the “compromise” deal on the changes to the “Made in Oregon” sign.
Leonard, a Portland State University alum, says the decision to forgo making money off the lot preceded the sign debate. But the financial aspects of the city’s deal with the university weren’t addressed at the April 8 public meeting on the sign. “I’ve told anybody who would listen,” Leonard says. “This is not a secret.”
FACT: A draft of the lease agreement, which must be approved by the City Council, states the university will have the lot for five years with an option to renew.
In Eugene, if you drive down from Hendricks Park, past Pre's Rock, as you round a bend and the landscape below opens to you, you are confronted with just such a tattoo high up on enormous Autzen Stadium. Although it should probably be expected in the context of state-U, pre-professional football preparation, it is still visually disruptive.
It will be far more so as you drive across the Burnside Bridge.
BTW, although you've called attention to Mr Leonard's alma mater, there is no mention that Mr Adams matriculated at UO.
Perhaps you or Mr Jaquiss can provide a calculation of what ceding the parking lot to UO means to the City's coffers and its taxpayers?
Cheers,
Beth
Please fight this Portland. That sign is iconic Portland. University of Oregon ought to stay in Eugene where it belongs.
I'm sorry you didn't put in the necessary work required to learn at the U of O. Perhaps no one told you so let me be the first: You must get out of your dorm bed, attend class and do the assigned work if you want to learn. Your failure to learn is not the fault of the school.
So now, after you wasted everyone's time and someones money(not yours I'm sure), you blame the institution and want everyone else to take up the fight to keep the school from put it's own name on the building it occupies and will likely soon own. You're right, you didn't learn shit in school.
I lived in Hamilton complex and yes, it sucked. So do most dorm rooms. Nice ones are the exception. The house i rented the following few years were just as bad. Having attended 3 universities I can assure you this is not unusual.