Monday, February 13

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 3
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 1
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 2
 

Almost Live: Rockets at Blazers

News So I'm having a bit of trouble with the picture, which is coming from my phone (I drew it on my way ... More

Feb 8, 2012 07:09 pm by CASEY JARMAN  | Comments 0
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · News · Charade In Oregon
June 3rd, 2009 BETH SLOVIC | News
 

Charade In Oregon

What you didn’t know about the “Made In Oregon” sign debate.

9 Comments
     
Tags:
ALL THAT GLITTERS: The controversy over the Made in Oregon sign involved neon—and money.

To Portlanders enamored of the “Made in Oregon” sign atop the White Stag building in Old Town, City Commissioner Randy Leonard appeared to be a hero.

On April 8, after much public debate about the fate of the neon sign, Leonard announced a compromise with the University of Oregon, which had the right to change the popular “Made in Oregon” in its 2006 deal with its landlord and the sign’s owner.

Leonard, who opposed the university’s changing the sign on the grounds it would alter an iconic part of Portland’s skyline, had wanted to use eminent domain to condemn the sign. He sought to bring the sign under the City of Portland’s control and block the university from putting its moniker on the west bank of the Willamette. And he proposed changing the message to “Portland, Oregon,” with “City of Roses” below.

Eventually, however, Leonard and the university compromised on a simpler message: “Oregon,” with the words “Portland” and “Old Town” underneath. “The outcome is clear,” Jan Oliver, an associate vice president for the university’s Portland campus, told City Council on April 8. “We are comfortable with it.”

Yet the terms of the deal weren’t at all clear; not to the public, anyway.

WW has learned that while everyone was focused on what the sign would say and how it would say it, another debate—about substance rather than style—bubbled at City Hall in the offices of Leonard and Mayor Sam Adams.

And it might have been an even more important debate, since it involved money at a time when the city was making significant budget cuts: What would the City of Portland give the University of Oregon for relinquishing its neon marketing tool? What would the city do to make the university whole?

The answer, it turns out, is a parking lot. Or, specifically, a city-owned lot that could have generated at least $54,000 a year for Portland’s Bureau of Transportation, which just shed 57 full-time jobs and $5.4 million under Adams’ recently approved 2009-10 budget.

To the university, the 27 spots under the west end of the Burnside Bridge—next to the university’s Portland home in the White Stag building—are worth more than the money the university could generate by subleasing the spaces. (Under the agreement between the school and the city still being finalized, the university will retain the right to rent the parking spots to other tenants of the White Stag building and the university’s new neighbor, Mercy Corps.)

The spots in the parking lot, formerly the site of Saturday Market, are viewed instead by the university as a key component of its safety strategy.

Students entering the building at all hours often use the side entrance under the bridge, since that’s the door that leads to the bike-storage room. In the months leading up to the great sign debate, university officials had expressed concern that they lacked an adequate presence in the sometimes vacant lot next to their building to monitor students’ safety. They wanted to set up a retail store under the bridge to create that vigilance, but for complicated legal reasons they could not do that—unless they also held a lease for the lot.

Adams knew that. And as early as December, the then-mayor-elect mentioned a willingness to help the university gain control of the parking lot, according to the university. It wasn’t until the last minute of the great sign debate, though, that Leonard says he learned of Adams’ separate negotiations with the university. “You’re giving away something for nothing,” Leonard says he told Adams then.

Now included in the proposed lease is the “compromise” deal on the changes to the “Made in Oregon” sign.

Leonard, a Portland State University alum, says the decision to forgo making money off the lot preceded the sign debate. But the financial aspects of the city’s deal with the university weren’t addressed at the April 8 public meeting on the sign. “I’ve told anybody who would listen,” Leonard says. “This is not a secret.”


FACT: A draft of the lease agreement, which must be approved by the City Council, states the university will have the lot for five years with an option to renew.

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
06.03.2009 at 05:08 Reply
Ms Slovic, as usual you've done a fine job of reporting; but you've omitted another offensive part of the "deal," the brand that Dave Frohnmeyer's UO gets to put on the urban-iconic wooden water tower: a giant yellow "O."

In Eugene, if you drive down from Hendricks Park, past Pre's Rock, as you round a bend and the landscape below opens to you, you are confronted with just such a tattoo high up on enormous Autzen Stadium. Although it should probably be expected in the context of state-U, pre-professional football preparation, it is still visually disruptive.

It will be far more so as you drive across the Burnside Bridge.

BTW, although you've called attention to Mr Leonard's alma mater, there is no mention that Mr Adams matriculated at UO.

Perhaps you or Mr Jaquiss can provide a calculation of what ceding the parking lot to UO means to the City's coffers and its taxpayers?

 

06.03.2009 at 07:25 Reply
It's true. The university would like to put an "O" on the water tower next to the sign. But that's been reported already, so I left it out. My bad.

Cheers,

Beth

 

06.04.2009 at 09:34 Reply
As someone who suffered through a terrible year and a half in Eugene as a University of Oregon student where I learned nothing beyond how terrible University of Oregon housing was, how comparably terrible and frankly dangerous the adjacent slum housing complexes are, and most of all how maddening opaque and dysfunctional the university administration was it would deeply sadden me to have a constant reminder of this unhappy experience saddling the west end of the burnside bridge.

Please fight this Portland. That sign is iconic Portland. University of Oregon ought to stay in Eugene where it belongs.

 

06.04.2009 at 04:48 Reply
Well, another overlooked issue in this debate is that the UO campus here in Eugene is completely falling apart with over 150 million in deferred maintenance. UO gets the option to buy the White Stag building in Portland in 2012. That effort needs to be blocked. Someday UO has to fix the ruins that now exist as its main campus. That will not happen if they are focused on Portland expenditures. www.youtube.com/luddite333

 

06.05.2009 at 09:59 Reply
Kyle,

I'm sorry you didn't put in the necessary work required to learn at the U of O. Perhaps no one told you so let me be the first: You must get out of your dorm bed, attend class and do the assigned work if you want to learn. Your failure to learn is not the fault of the school.

So now, after you wasted everyone's time and someones money(not yours I'm sure), you blame the institution and want everyone else to take up the fight to keep the school from put it's own name on the building it occupies and will likely soon own. You're right, you didn't learn shit in school.

I lived in Hamilton complex and yes, it sucked. So do most dorm rooms. Nice ones are the exception. The house i rented the following few years were just as bad. Having attended 3 universities I can assure you this is not unusual.

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close