Monday, February 13

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 3
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 1
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 2
 

Almost Live: Rockets at Blazers

News So I'm having a bit of trouble with the picture, which is coming from my phone (I drew it on my way ... More

Feb 8, 2012 07:09 pm by CASEY JARMAN  | Comments 0
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · News · O Say Can You See
July 8th, 2009 BETH SLOVIC | News
 

O Say Can You See

The University of Oregon’s revised plan for Portland’s skyline keeps the school logo.

4 Comments
     
Tags:
UP IN LIGHTS: The University of Oregon wants its athletic logo in neon on Old Town’s water tower.

The University of Oregon’s battle to change Portland’s skyline enters the second round Monday, July 13—and it may yet end with the school’s brand in neon over the Burnside Bridge.

Under a compromise agreement that ended round one in April, the university agreed to drop its efforts to put the school’s name on the “Made in Oregon” sign above its Portland campus on the west bank of the Willamette River in exchange for something else the university wanted: a free five-year lease on the parking lot underneath the Burnside Bridge (see “Charade in Oregon,” WW, June 3, 2009).

The design of the Made in Oregon sign, which would in future years read only “Oregon,” goes before the city’s Landmarks Commission on Monday.

But in addition to reviewing the university’s revised proposal for the Made in Oregon sign, the commission will look at the university’s planned changes to the 100-year-old water tower next to the sign.

Those changes include painting over existing images on the tower that say “Old Town” on the east side and Made in Oregon on the west side and installing two 6 1/2-foot neon yellow “O’s” in their place.

So far, the proposed changes to the water tower have not generated the same volume of heated response as the initial application to change the Made in Oregon sign. Last spring, more than 28,000 people joined the Facebook group calling for the preservation of Portland’s Made in Oregon sign. And hundreds wrote letters and emails to city officials protesting the University of Oregon’s changes to the sign.

Some Portlanders who opposed letting the university put its name on the sign have called the plan to put the school’s athletic logo on the water tower “garish,” according to a staff report from the Bureau of Development Services, which oversees the approval process.

But Commissioner Randy Leonard, who last spring opposed the university’s plans to put the school’s name on the Made in Oregon sign, says the idea to put athletic logos on the water tower is anything but tacky.

Leonard, a Portland State University graduate, says he’s OK with that part of the University of Oregon’s plan because the “O” is “neutral.”

Kurt Huffman, co-owner of the restaurant Ping on Northwest 4th Avenue and a member of the business association in Old Town, isn’t so much concerned as puzzled by the university’s attempts at branding.

“It’s not exactly a commodity they’re selling,” says Huffman, who went to Reed College. “I can only imagine the most demented people in the world deciding to send their child to the University of Oregon because of a sign on a water tower.”

But that’s not why the university wants the visibility, says Jan Oliver, the U of O’s special assistant for Portland advancement projects. A conspicuous presence promotes affinity to a school, so the thinking goes.

“It sounds odd,” Oliver says. “That said, there is not a public institution in higher education that does not have a brand.”


FACT: A public hearing before the Landmarks Commission begins Monday, July 13, at 1:30 pm in Room 2500A, 1900 SW 4th Ave.
 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
07.08.2009 at 10:30 Reply
All of our schools deserve affinity. Why not paint the watertower with PPS? It's neutral but not too garish or tacky.

 

07.08.2009 at 10:04 Reply
I feel that the "Old Town" water tower is not getting enough publicity as people are distracted by the "Made in Oregon" sign. It is important that we still protect another one of Portland's cherished symbols.

Save the water tower!

For more in depth analysis on the proposed designs, I have written a blog post over at my blog:

http://bit.ly/I5FqV

 

07.09.2009 at 07:10 Reply
I couldn't disagree more with Commissioner Leonard. The compromise in April did not include neon signage on the water tower. The only lighted sign was the current "made in oregon" sign though the wording would change. The "O" is not neutral and the water tower does not currently have lighted signage. This is a significant change and departure from the compromise reached in April and Commissioner Leonard either forgot how upset he was or never really cared in the first place. I fear this is another example of Commissioner Leonard saying one thing and doing another as he has with the capping of the City's open reservoirs.

 

07.18.2009 at 10:05 Reply
The UO does enough cult branding in Eugene. I appreciate that Portland is not going to stand for UO meddling with the identity of the city.

www.youtube.com/luddite333

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close