Saturday, February 11

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 1
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 1
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 1
 

Almost Live: Rockets at Blazers

News So I'm having a bit of trouble with the picture, which is coming from my phone (I drew it on my way ... More

Feb 8, 2012 07:09 pm by CASEY JARMAN  | Comments 0
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · News · Clear Beer
July 29th, 2009 BETH SLOVIC | News
 

Clear Beer

Widmer worries that proposed water changes could ail their industry.

6 Comments
     
Tags:

If making beer is both science and art, Kurt and Rob Widmer are equal parts chemists and creators.

Lately, however, the Portland brewery brothers have been political campaigners, too.

Months after they worked at the Legislature to kill an increase in the state beer tax, the Widmers are weighing in on the quality of Portland’s water.

This week, Portland City Council will consider a resolution that, if approved, would direct the Water Bureau to proceed with plans for a new water filtration plant in the Bull Run watershed, where Portland gets almost all of its drinking water.

The $385 million proposal aims to keep Portland in compliance with rules from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency designed to protect drinking water from cryptosporidium, an illness-causing microorganism that has not been found recently in Portland’s water supply. In terms of scale and expense, the proposal dwarfs Portland’s recent foray into stadium building.

But far fewer people are aware of filtration’s consequences, which include higher water rates estimated to jump 18 percent a year for five years.

The Widmer brothers certainly are aware of it.

Last week, the Widmers caught the attention of David Shaff, the city’s Water Bureau director, after they wrote Commissioner Dan Saltzman and members of Oregon’s congressional delegation to oppose the plan for a water filtration plant.

They called the federal rules “completely unnecessary,” and urged elected leaders to push the EPA for a variance.

“The same pristine water supply which you are presently discussing filtering, chemically treating and ultimately altering in ways we don’t completely understand is the very foundation and soul of the great beer that has placed Portland on the map as one of the outstanding brewing cities in the world,” the Widmers wrote July 20.

After many months of study, Shaff says he was “surprised” by the Widmers’ concern. He says a new filtration plant could actually improve the Widmers’ beer-making process, “because the water will be a more consistent quality.”

One of the Widmer brothers’ chief concerns is money. Their 25-year-old company, which employs 160 Portlanders and has Anheuser-Busch as a minority investor, will use 40 million gallons of Bull Run water this year, at a cost of about $100,000.

That’s a drop in the keg of their $86 million-a-year company, even amid a recession that has kept business “flat,” in the words of Kurt Widmer.

But changing the water could cost the company far more in indirect expenses, if those changes alter their beer’s taste and require costlier solutions, which is the brothers’ biggest worry. And so far no one has been able to guarantee the new water treatment for removing potential microorganisms won’t irreparably harm their product, which is 95 percent water. Fixing it could cost “millions,” the Widmers say.

The Water Bureau says nearly all large U.S. cities now filter their water in the way Portland proposes. San Francisco, New York, Boston, Seattle and Tacoma do not, but are also taking action to remain in compliance.

The Widmers weren’t willing to point to another beer that has been harmed by filtered water.

The problem, they say, is that they won’t know how their product might change until it’s too late to reverse it. And at that point, the brewery will be forced to address the problems on the fly. In 24 hours, the company might brew up to 70,000 gallons of beer. “We can’t stop and say, ‘Time out, we need to figure this out,’” Rob Widmer says.

An alternative exists that the Widmers support as a last resort. Instead of filtering the water, the city could use UV technology to kill cryptosporidium, as San Francisco, New York, Boston and Seattle plan to do under EPA guidelines.

That option would cost Portland less than $100 million, but the Water Bureau says filtration is superior because it will allow Portland to get more water from Bull Run. Commissioner Amanda Fritz, however, supports UV.

“It’s not just less expensive, it’s actually a better treatment option,” Fritz says.

The Widmers need two other commissioners to side with Fritz if they are to prevail in this years-long battle. Saltzman has interest in the UV process but supported filtration as the Water Bureau commissioner in 2002. Mayor Sam Adams and Commissioner Nick Fish have not said how they will vote.

Commissioner Randy Leonard, who oversees the Water Bureau, says a filtration plant is the best option.

A few of Portland’s other high-volume water users are coming to the Widmers’ defense, even if the change won’t affect their beverages’ taste.

“The Widmer brothers have it right,” says Steve McCarthy, founder of Clear Creek Distillery. “Water is a very important component of all these products, and to the extent that you have water that has some character to it, you have a better product.”

News intern Aaron Mendelson contributed to this report.


FACT: The Widmer brothers met for lunch at the Gasthaus Pub with David Shaff on July 27. The Widmers say they’re now focused on putting pressure on Oregon’s congressional delegation for an EPA variance.
 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
07.29.2009 at 09:27 Reply
Cool this gives me a reason to never drink their beer again. Clean water > beer.

 

07.29.2009 at 10:24 Reply
Here's an update on the issue. In a surprise twist, City Council voted 5-0 for UV instead of filtration.

 

07.29.2009 at 10:39 Reply
I bet the Widmer brothers do in fact treat the brewery intake water in some fashion before starting a batch.

Reasons? How about these from the Portland Water Bureau web site:

Bull Run water is treated with both chlorine and ammonia, both powerful oxidizers that change taste in addition to doing their job of killing bugs.

The Portland water system has 2000 miles of mains delivering water to the region, some mains over 100 years old.

The older mains are cast iron and ductile iron - check out any reputable technical source for the long term effects of treated water on these kinds of pipes (the City is going to cement lined iron mains for some reason).

Cross connections and backflow situations occur in water systems as they are expanded over time and users come and go, would you risk 70K gallons of beer on the possibility that somewhere a cross connection is putting something your customers won't like in that beer?

Portland's resistance to treating its water goes back at least 50 years I am aware of and will likely continue until there is a major consumer health problem. Businesses can add treatment relatively inexpensively and will if water quality fluctuates (see Portland Water Bureau site) but you and I can't do the same. Those faucet mounted activated carbon units and under the sink ion exchange units are not what we are talking about here. This is a classic case of political heads in the sand - wait until there is an emergency and then set your hair on fire and run in circles putting it out with a hammer.

The Widmer brothers are an Oregon treasure and I will continue to consume more than my share of their great brews knowing full well they have taken care of the myriad issues present with Portland water.

 

07.29.2009 at 11:17 Reply
t
This is EPA bureaucratic BULLSHIT. As someone stated above, PDX water is already treated, not to mention the fact that there is no fucking Cryptosporidium to speak of in the bull run system. We have the fucking best queslity water in the US, and the EPA wants more chemicals, which in themselves can pose a risk? Have a pair City Council. I would do absolutely NOTHING.

 

07.31.2009 at 06:12 Reply
Besides, the alcohol in beer kills microorganisms and is thus safe to drink. If we all drank beer instead of water, we'd be in fine shape.

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close