Thursday, February 09

Almost Live: Rockets at Blazers

News So I'm having a bit of trouble with the picture, which is coming from my phone (I drew it on my way ... More

Feb 8, 2012 07:09 pm by CASEY JARMAN  | Comments 0
 

Have A Fossil-Fuel-Free Weekend, Courtesy of PSU

News In an effort to assess Portlanders’ actual enthusiasm for electric cars, Portland State University... More

Feb 8, 2012 11:30 am by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 0
 

Another View On Occupy Vs. The Police (Updated)

News With a press release about a planned "anti-police" protest tonight by Occupy Portland, the Portland ... More

Feb 6, 2012 06:07 pm by Corey Pein  | Comments 0
 

Almost Live: Thunder at Blazers

News I'd say the atmosphere here qualifies as "hyped." Especially for a Monday night.At every Thunder gam... More

Feb 6, 2012 05:58 pm by CASEY JARMAN  | Comments 0
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · News · Making It Rain
November 18th, 2009 JAMES PITKIN | News
 

Making It Rain

Oregon’s most litigious stripper is out to reform the industry.

23 Comments
     
Tags:
RAINMAKER: Zipporah Foster.
IMAGE: Courtesy of Zipporah Foster

Zipporah Foster isn’t finished yet.

The 28-year-old exotic dancer from Gresham is filing lawsuits against Portland-area strip joints faster than a drunk can throw singles. Foster is already suing three clubs where she’s worked (see “Strip Fees,” WW, July 1, 2009). Next up is Shimmers, a Southeast Portland dive she plans to sue as early as this month.

The suits, all filed since June, allege Foster should have been paid the state’s minimum wage of $8.40 an hour for her time at the pole. Instead, most strippers nationwide dance for tips only. On top of that, they’re often expected to pay the club a “stage fee” for each shift—and tip out the bar staff.

Foster, who goes by the stage name “Mocha,” insists strippers deserve to be paid like any other worker. She and other dancers around the country are beginning to take a stand, and a handful have successfully sued for back wages.

“A lot of dancers, because they [club owners] try to make you feel low about what you’re doing, they [dancers] don’t have knowledge that this is wrong,” says Foster, a single mom who grew up in Sacramento.

Foster’s litigious streak cuts to the heart of the industry’s economic model, which does not compensate its most valuable and visible workers. Portland’s exotic clubs, like their counterparts nationwide, classify dancers as independent contractors instead of employees.

But as dancers have noted, they can be fired for failing to show up for a shift or leaving early. They’re also often tightly controlled—down to the schedule they work, the time they spend onstage, the music they dance to and the amount they charge for a lap dance.

What sets Foster apart—and gives her the insouciance to sue—is that she doesn’t fear retaliation. After 10 years in the business, she wants out, perhaps to become a psychologist or a backup singer.

“It’s hard just to start all over,” Foster says. “I’m looking for a backup plan, but right now I’m a dancer.”

She currently works five nights a week at Doc’s Club 82 on Southeast 82nd Avenue. Foster says her situation there is better than at prior clubs.

Since WW wrote about her first lawsuit last summer, Foster says a handful of Portland clubs, including Doc’s, have stopped charging stage fees and started treating their dancers with more respect.

By Foster’s account, Shimmers was a different story. At the working-class club on Southeast Foster Road, Foster says she was charged a $10 stage fee and faced hostile bosses. Foster says she was fired last month for going home early, after a manager learned she was suing other clubs.

So far, Foster is suing Exotica International Club for Men in Northeast Portland, the Safari Showclub in Southeast Portland, and Stars Cabaret & Steakhouse in Beaverton, seeking a total of $165,500 in back wages and lost stage fees. None of the clubs has settled, and the Exotica suit is now set for trial in February.

Shimmers owner Tom Webb says he charges a stage fee only if dancers leave early or skip a shift—a claim Foster disputes. He says Foster and a fellow dancer who plans to join her lawsuit against Shimmers were fired for poor attitude.

“They’re just out to try to make some money,” Webb says. “They’re gonna wind up losing, and they won’t be able to dance anywhere in Portland.”

Foster says she wouldn’t miss the work.

“I love to dance,” she says. “I love doing pole tricks. But I don’t like all the power trips.”


FACT: Shimmers, then known as Tommy’s III, was the site of a murder when Earl Richard Barker was shot dead outside the door on Aug. 23, 2008. Barker was at the club visiting a dancer named Cinnamon. The crime is still unsolved.
 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
11.18.2009 at 05:28 Reply
These dancer/stripper/lapdance-humpers have been picking guys pockets for years.

With the current economic recession taking a big bite out of customers disposable income, it looks like Foster and a few others of her ilk feel their employers are the new "low hanging fruit"..

Ladies, if you don't like the work get out of the business.

No one put a gun to your head and made you take your clothes off for money (well, maybe someone did, but not your employers).

Form a union or something?

If you don't like the gig, and the pay plan, don't do it.

 

11.18.2009 at 07:28 Reply
I worked as a police officer for over 24 years in the metro area, with several spent working sex crimes.

Strippers were, without a doubt, the most dysfunctional, abused, dangerous, self-destructive group of people I ever had to deal with.

I quit going to strip clubs with the guys after I had dealt a few dancers on the job. Couldn't shake the thought of what desperate, sad people they are.

 

11.18.2009 at 10:02 Reply
CA
While I understand what you're both saying I'm also going to have to agree with the her when she says the way strippers are paid (or pay out) is a little ridiculous. They got into the business themselves, sure, but I can't blame her for trying to take a stand against the way it's run.

 

11.18.2009 at 11:02 Reply
dan
So the people who are absolutely the biggest draws for these business need to pay for the privilege to make tips? And they aren't "employees"? That's absurd.

That the gals are willingly taking the jobs doesn't release the employer from following wage laws. When employers can flaunt wage laws for certain types of jobs just because they're 'unsavory' we all lose.

A union's a good idea, and frankly, this shouldn't even be a civil case. I wouldn't be surprises if John Kroger doesn't get busy on this issue. Not paying your workers is theft, plain and simple.

 

11.18.2009 at 11:56 Reply
picking guys' pockets? please. i've watched dudes sit at the rack and not tip, song after song. the girls are taking it off but they're not necessarily getting paid, in tips OR in wages. this industry needs more regulation, particularly in how its workers are paid.

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close