Tuesday, February 14

A Lovers' Guide to Tonight's Blazers/Wizards Game: An Almost Live Special Report

News I will not be live-blogging tonight's Blazers/Wizards Valentine's Day matchup (too busy being romant... More

Feb 14, 2012 05:05 pm by CASEY JARMAN  | Comments 0
 

Valentine's Day in the Naked City: Couple Arrested After Sex Role-Playing in Grocery Parking Lot

News A Northeast Portland couple took sex-in-a-car to new places in celebration of Valentine’s Day, muc... More

Feb 14, 2012 03:55 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 0
 

Washington State Senate Approves CRC Tolls

News A big step to raising money for the $3.5 billion Columbia River Crossing cleared its first vote Tues... More

Feb 14, 2012 01:03 pm by WW Staff  | Comments 0
 

Sam Adams is on Yelp

News The other day I noticed a curious tweet from our venerable mayor's Twitter account:Yes, Sam is tweet... More

Feb 13, 2012 01:20 pm by RUTH BROWN  | Comments 4
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · News · Public Options
January 13th, 2010 BETH SLOVIC | News
 

Public Options

Will anybody qualify for $150,000 in campaign financing this year?

3 Comments
     
Tags:
FOUR OF A KIND: Four candidates seeking public financing are (left to right) Jesse Cornett, Spencer Burton, Mary Volm and Jason Renaud.
IMAGE: dlreamer.com

The upcoming re-election campaigns of Commissioners Nick Fish and Dan Saltzman will be the last test of public campaign financing for City Council races before voters decide in November whether to keep the relatively new system.

And with the Jan. 29 deadline looming for candidates to qualify in the May primary for $150,000 in public financing, none of the challengers to those two incumbents appears to have a lock on the money. They each need 1,000 signatures and matching $5 donations from registered Portland voters to qualify.

That’s a big contrast to 2008, when six candidates, five of them seeking an open seat, qualified for funding in the May primary. Two then qualified for funding in the November general election, for a total cost to taxpayers of $1.2 million. But a gathering last Friday night of four Saltzman challengers seeking public campaign financing shows Commissioner Amanda Fritz that the setup remains a success. Fritz is the first and only city commissioner to win election with public funding, in 2008.

“To me it’s working because it’s available,” Fritz says. “Citizens have a realistic chance of running for City Council and winning.”

All four candidates who showed up at Northeast Alberta Street’s Dough Nation pizza tent (you can’t really call it a food cart) want to unseat Saltzman, a three-term incumbent who has lately angered some Portlanders for his management of the Portland Police Bureau. In November, Saltzman reversed an earlier decision to place the officer at the center of James Chasse’s 2006 death on administrative leave, pending an investigation into the officer’s shooting a beanbag at a 12-year-old girl Nov. 14.

But a visitor to the pizza tent Jan. 8 wouldn’t have thought the public finance system was being used to outgun a sitting commissioner.

As of Friday, none of the four candidates—mental health advocate Jason Renaud, ex-Portland State University lobbyist Jesse Cornett, former longtime city employee Mary Volm, and Spencer Burton, a mason—was close to gathering the minimum number of signatures or $5 contributions to qualify. (Family therapist Ed Garren, a fifth candidate, did not appear at the event. Candidate No. 6, Rudy Soto, a Fish intern and former student-body president at Portland State University, announced on Jan. 11 he will run.)

All except Burton were optimistic they would make it by the Jan. 29 deadline.

“I’ve got a good clip going,” says Volm, who got 11 donations and signatures at the aptly named Dough Nation. “Everyone thinks it’s doable.”

When it comes to hustle Jim Middaugh—once chief of staff to former Commissioner Erik Sten—is something of a model. In his race to replace Sten when Sten resigned midterm in 2008, Middaugh collected almost 1,600 signatures in about three weeks. (Not that it mattered, since Fish—who spurned public finance to raise about $160,000—beat Middaugh.)

Fritz says gathering signatures and $5 donations is not as easy as it looks. In part that’s because the fundraising also comes with a hefty amount of paperwork.

“It’s a lot harder than it sounds,” she says. “And if you think it’s easy, you’ve never tried.”

In 2005, Sten, then-Mayor Tom Potter, Saltzman and then-Commissioner Sam Adams voted 4-1 to create public financing for city candidates. The idea was to refer the system to voters after Portlanders had tested it three times. Commissioner Randy Leonard was the only “no” vote. “I believed it needed authorization from voters,” he says now.

In 2006, Saltzman faced what initially appeared to be a tough re-election campaign after he angered neighborhood activists with a decision to cover the Mount Tabor reservoir. But, despite drawing six opponents, Saltzman won handily.

As of Jan. 11, Saltzman hadn’t officially announced he would run in 2010. But he had a campaign manager, and he appeared poised to begin collecting private donations in earnest.

Fish, who has already collected donations this cycle from the Perkins Coie law firm, R.B. Pamplin Corp. and the Trail Blazers, also hadn’t officially declared his intention to run. Only one of Fish’s four challengers, Sylvia Evans, has said she intends to seek public financing.


FACT: Portland’s public campaign fund currently has about $731,000.
 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
01.13.2010 at 02:11 Reply
Just because someone gives a candidate $5 doesn't mean they're going to vote for them and/or support them. The best way to support a candidate�public finance participant or not�is to vote for them. And, if you really like a candidate, non-monetarily encourage others to do the same.

I simply cannot believe that at this time of unprecedented economic need that politicians should be demanding public money to clog mailboxes with clipart-filled postcards with empty political statements, petroleum-based plastic lawn signs, and annoying political telemarketers. Instead, people who have the ability to donate should be donating to nonprofit and charitable causes.

Imagine how society as a whole could have benefited if all the money spent on for and against advertising on Measures 66 and 67, Portland City Council, etc., were instead spent to benefit everyone. Imagine what that $731K sitting in the public campaign fund could do for lowering sewer bills, or utility assistance, lowering public transit fares, or providing shelter beds to the homeless... doing *something* other than lining pockets of politicians.

Oh yeah... elect Jason Barbour! ElectJasonBarbour.com!

 

01.13.2010 at 06:11 Reply
The big difference here is that Amanda won an open seat. There's no way a publicly-financed candidate beats an incumbent in an even-money race. I think everybody is just yawning at this point.

 

01.13.2010 at 09:24 Reply
It is great that Commissioner Dan Saltzman voted for the reform program and, though he didn't opt in during the 2006 contest, he self-limited his spending and the size of contributions. He did go slightly over the $150,000 spending limit but that 2006 race was still a financial fair fight, especially compared to past city contests involving incumbents with no viable opponents. This indicates that the reform program addresses the financial advantage of incumbency.

Obviously there are other advantages of incumbency, but if folks are evaluating the reform program only by whether or not incumbents are defeated they may want to focus on term limits. Also keep in mind that an incumbent has a record that can be used against them. A final point is that the private money system replaced by VOE is far more helpful to incumbents than challengers.

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close