Friday, May 25

Portland Police Advise iPhone Users Not To Stare, Zombielike, At Their Devices

News Portland police yesterday announced that they'd caught that most elusive brand of criminal, the smar... More

May 25, 2012 12:32 pm by COREY PEIN  | Comments 0
 

Oswego Lake Access Issue Heads to Federal Court

Lawsuit says the city has a responsibility to “protect and preserve the public’s right of access to and use of the Lake.”

News A federal judge may decide if Oswego Lake is open to the public. A lawsuit filed this morning in U.... More

May 24, 2012 01:16 pm by Martin Cizmar  | Comments 8
 

Oregonian's Sister Paper To Cease Daily Publication; Updated

News In another sign of the difficult financial realities for print newspapers, the New Orleans Times-Pic... More

May 24, 2012 09:20 am by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 2
 

Oregon Senators Back Bill Aimed At Citizens United

News Speaking of money in politics… U.S. Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) is among those speaking on the Senate... More

May 23, 2012 11:08 am by Corey Pein  | Comments 0
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · News · The Big Ask
November 10th, 2010 BETH SLOVIC | News
 

The Big Ask

How Portland Public Schools plans to win your support for a $548 million bond issue.

33 Comments
     
Tags:

Half of recently surveyed voters in Portland said the state’s largest school district didn’t do a good job of managing its finances, according to Portland Public Schools.

But Superintendent Carole Smith put forward a new plan Monday to ask Portlanders to raise their property taxes to support public education for 47,000 students anyway. The hit for the average property owner in the school district would be about $300 to $350 per year.

That new plan, if approved by the Portland School Board on Dec. 13, calls for a six-year, $548 million construction bond measure on the May 2011 ballot. The goal? To rebuild or renovate all of PPS’s 85 campuses now that the district has finally settled its long-awaited high-school redesign with the closure of Marshall.

Smith’s announcement Monday got a round of applause from School Board members, meaning it’s unlikely the members (some of whom come up for re-election on the same May 2011 ballot) will reject Smith’s plan next month when it returns to them for a formal vote.

So, what will the plan accomplish? And why?

Two months ago, PPS commissioned a $21,600 poll by the research firm Davis, Hibbitts & Midghall to weigh voters’ support for a possible tax measure. The results of the poll suggest 62 percent of voters are likely to support construction bonds in the neighborhood of $500 million. Only 30 percent of surveyed voters said they would reject a measure of such magnitude.

“In this economy, people care about jobs and education,” says Adam Davis, firm partner and the school district’s pollster. And the district’s proposed measure, which would create an as yet unknown number of construction jobs beginning next summer, combines both themes.

There were several other reasons for which respondents said they would support a tax hike, and those reasons are reflected in the design of the superintendent’s plan.

Surveyed voters said they put a high priority on making major renovations to the buildings that need urgent repairs first. As a result, Marysville K-8 School, which burned in a devastating fire last November, forcing students to relocate to the mothballed Rose City Park Elementary School, will be rebuilt ahead of any other school, Smith says.

Seven other schools, including Roosevelt, Jefferson and Cleveland high schools, plus Faubion, Laurelhurst, Markham and Rigler primary schools, will also get full renovations. Lincoln High School, which sits inside the boundaries of Mayor Sam Adams’ newly proposed urban renewal zone, would get new architectural designs with money from the bond issue.

But to appeal to voters in all neighborhoods, not just the ones with buildings in the worst condition, PPS plans to offer upgrades at all 85 campuses. Those universal improvements would include new, modern doors that open with key cards and additional accessibility for disabled students.

Thirty-seven schools with middle-school grades would get new science labs, and 33 elementary schools would get covered playgrounds (but no guarantees the district will keep physical education programs amid dwindling operations budgets).

The school district’s last capital improvement measure came in 1995 and largely paid for seismic upgrades at school. Yet many of Portland’s schools date to the World War II era and earlier, making them on average 60 to 65 years old.

“Anyone needs a face-lift after 65 years, I think,” says Pam Knowles, co-chairwoman of the Portland School Board.

If approved by voters, the $548 million bond measure would probably be only the first in a series of measures in the next 20 to 30 years. Smith says her goal is to persuade voters to approve new construction until all of the district’s schools have received the overhauls the district says they need.


FACT: The Portland School Board will hold a public hearing on the proposed bond measure Dec. 1. The board will then vote Dec. 13 whether to forward the measure to voters in May.
 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
11.10.2010 at 05:35 Reply
It is quite brilliant (and/or subversive) to have this vote for over 1/2 a billion dollars in May 2011...

You see, maybe 15% of the electorate will even turn in their ballot for an off-year May election.

Davis, Hibbitts & Midghall is a good firm. The questions I ponder is if that 62% number was calculated after they asked "Will you be voting in the May 2011 election" and if the pool of people that they contacted only included the %15.16 who voted in the May 19th, 2009 election?

Maybe the school board will share the questions and cross-tabs with Willamette Week to further analyze?

 

11.10.2010 at 09:39 Reply
Taxpayers should also ask the questions: Do we really want to trust PPS and the current school board with $half a billion when they have yet to demonstrate that they can provide equity at the middle school and high school levels. Until they demonstrate measurable success in either of these areas, my vote will be NO. I would also guess that when this survey was done, none of the schools that would immediately be on the Fix It list were named. I find it ironic that this study came out so quickly when it took two years to determine high school redesign. I can't get behind a bigger, newer Jeff until they can show they can maintain enrollment over 1,000. In the meantime, the larger schools suffer even though they receive substantially less per student.

 

11.10.2010 at 10:24 Reply
We're in the middle of a recession. Why would I want to pay for covered playgrounds and I'm sure plenty of other un-needed luxuries. If this bond was to hire more teachers and reduce class size I'd be all for it.

 

11.10.2010 at 10:44 Reply
Sleazy is the only word for the play from our esteemed educators.

Carole and the clan deliberately put this election off until May specifically to avoid the Double Majority rule: This rule was put in by voters because of just this reason. The majority should vote for tax increases; the rule was amended in Nov 2008 to allow for tax increases to be voted in an election held in May or November that is not an even numbered year.

That means 10 people can vote and pass this tax on the rest of us.

It is not possible for me to be more disgusted with PPS. These are the "educators" and I use that term loosely, that placed 7th worst in the Race To The Top contest, worth $175 million- 7th Worst out of 50 states. And when given a second chance to apply for the $175 million, they didn't even try. These people don't deserve another dime until they raise their game to at least a passing level. Right now their grade is F. One out of two kids graduate high school in PPS. Over half that graduate can only read at a grade school level; never mind math, science, few ever master those subjects to a level that 12th graders should master by getting a high school diploma. PPS pushed back a 10th grade test to 11th grade to make the test results look better. PPS just changed more rules to allow spell check on tests FOR READING COMPREHENSION.

How much more can they dumb it down? And all in an effort to make the teachers and the administrators look better on paper; nothing to do with helping kids to learn.

And we are supposed to respect these people?

 

11.10.2010 at 12:25 Reply
At my last conference with my daughter's fifth grade teacher, I asked her why my daughter was not learning how to do long division.

After a condescending discussion about how kids learn math a new way now, and learn multiple ways of solving problems, she had my daughter (who was right there) demonstrate this. She could not solve the problem. Then the teacher said, "In most situations where she has a problem like this, she will have access to a calculator."

After that conversation, I realized that my child would not get adequate preparation for college (or life) in Portland Public Schools. She is now enrolled in a private school. It is expensive, but my daughter's future is worth it.

I checked, and based on the assessed value of my home, the tax increase will be $500, not $300.

As the article points out, people are concerned about jobs and education. Not construction jobs to build schools in which poor education takes place. Our own jobs, which no longer pay enough for us to waste money on a school system that does not work.

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close