Friday, May 25

Portland Police Advise iPhone Users Not To Stare, Zombielike, At Their Devices

News Portland police yesterday announced that they'd caught that most elusive brand of criminal, the smar... More

May 25, 2012 12:32 pm by COREY PEIN  | Comments 0
 

Oswego Lake Access Issue Heads to Federal Court

Lawsuit says the city has a responsibility to “protect and preserve the public’s right of access to and use of the Lake.”

News A federal judge may decide if Oswego Lake is open to the public. A lawsuit filed this morning in U.... More

May 24, 2012 01:16 pm by Martin Cizmar  | Comments 8
 

Oregonian's Sister Paper To Cease Daily Publication; Updated

News In another sign of the difficult financial realities for print newspapers, the New Orleans Times-Pic... More

May 24, 2012 09:20 am by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 2
 

Oregon Senators Back Bill Aimed At Citizens United

News Speaking of money in politics… U.S. Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) is among those speaking on the Senate... More

May 23, 2012 11:08 am by Corey Pein  | Comments 0
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · Politics · John Q. Public
February 2nd, 2011 NIGEL JAQUISS | Politics
 

John Q. Public

Records issues put spotlight on Kroger.

John KrogerJohn Kroger. - IMAGE: cameronbrowne.com

Attorney General John Kroger is pushing the most ambitious rewrite of Oregon’s Public Records Law in three decades.

But one aspect of his legislation may get him crosswise with Treasurer Ted Wheeler, a fellow Democrat and political rival.

In the legislative session that began in earnest this week, Kroger introduced Senate Bill 41. The measure aims to produce public records more quickly, more cheaply and with fewer exemptions. Since the original public records law in 1973, special interests have increased the number of exemptions more than sevenfold—from 55 to more than 400. 

Kroger’s proposed change that could cause a political dust-up is bill language aimed at prying open the details of contracts the state treasury signs with private equity investment firms. 

In the wake of a mini-scandal over state investment officers’ travel expenses, Kroger wants Oregon’s Treasury Department to disclose “investment-related records of treasurer and [Oregon Investment Council]” because they should not be “exempt insofar as they contain information about any benefit received by a state employee or state agency.”

That proposal puts Wheeler—Kroger’s potential rival in the 2014 Democratic gubernatorial primary—in an interesting bind. Wheeler says the state’s investment agreements may contain proprietary information and that disclosing their details would take away Oregon’s information edge in those deals.

But Wheeler is in a box. If he opposes Kroger’s proposals, he hands his potential future gubernatorial rival an issue by appearing to oppose transparency. If he goes along with Kroger, he may be surrendering valuable information. 

For now, Wheeler is taking a positive approach toward the proposed guidelines drafted for his agency.

“We haven’t seen the final language yet,” says Wheeler’s spokesman, James Sinks. “But we are fully supportive of the attorney general’s efforts.”

Others are less supportive of Kroger’s current approach to public records, but in a separate context—the long-running battle over the Department of Justice investigation into contracting practices at the Oregon Department of Energy. That probe took a new turn last week.

On Jan. 26, the same day The Oregonian published a front-page story about the role of Gov. John Kitzhaber’s longtime companion, Cylvia Hayes, in an Oregon Department of Energy contract, state officials demanded the return of nine discs filled with investigative material from attorneys representing four ODOE employees who remain on administrative leave related to the investigation.

On Jan. 26, DOJ attorney Donna Bennett wrote to ODOE  employees’ attorneys, requesting they return the discs and “destroy any electronic or hard copies of those discs that have been made.”

“It appears that the discs may contain information that should not have been released,” Bennett explained.

But Bill Gary and Dave Frohnmayer, ODOE director Mark Long’s former attorneys, blasted DOJ’s handling of the records by Kroger’s department. 

“While we are sensitive to the interests of the many people and businesses whose rights have been violated by the attorney general’s unlawful disclosure of confidential information, the responsibility for those violations rests entirely with the attorney general,” Gary and Frohmayer wrote Jan. 28.

  Translation: The Oregonian has some or all of the records the AG still has not made public, and at least some of the lawyers who have them are refusing to give them back. 

Kroger spokesman Tony Green says regarding the Treasury issue that Kroger’s only interest is to increase transparency. And as for the ODOE files, Green says, “We are currently working to ensure that sensitive information is not disclosed publicly.” 

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
02.03.2011 at 05:06 Reply

What are we paying folks for, and what are those being paid to look-out for the taxpayers interest hiding.  Unbelievable.

 

02.03.2011 at 05:10 Reply

While Kroger's focus is on transparency can he UNSEAL all of the files Neil Goldschmidt's friend, Ted Kulongoski sealed, and can he return all the files the state has on Neil Goldschmidt online to we don't have to drive our fat tuccusses down to Salem to go through them line by line?

 

02.03.2011 at 05:41 Reply

While Kroger's focus is on transparency can he UNSEAL all of the files Neil Goldschmidt's friend, Ted Kulongoski sealed, and can he return all the files the state has on Neil Goldschmidt online to we don't have to drive our fat tuccusses down to Salem to go through them line by line?

 

02.04.2011 at 07:48 Reply

"On Jan. 26, the same day The Oregonian published a front-page story about the role of Gov. John Kitzhaber’s longtime companion, Cylvia Hayes, in an Oregon Department of Energy contract, state officials demanded the return of nine discs filled with investigative material from attorneys representing four ODOE employees who remain on administrative leave related to the investigation.

On Jan. 26, DOJ attorney Donna Bennett wrote to ODOE  employees’ attorneys, requesting they return the discs and “destroy any electronic or hard copies of those discs that have been made.”

“It appears that the discs may contain information that should not have been released,” Bennett explained. (*oooops! What REALLY are they hiding and who are they really protecting?)

But Bill Gary and Dave Frohnmayer, ODOE director Mark Long’s former attorneys, blasted DOJ’s handling of the records by Kroger’s department. 

“While we are sensitive to the interests of the many people and businesses whose rights have been violated by the attorney general’s unlawful disclosure of confidential information, the responsibility for those violations rests entirely with the attorney general,” Gary and Frohmayer wrote Jan. 28."

Additional Translation:  How did the conspiring parties come up with Cylvia's fee range of 50-70K for expert RW Beck to shave-off or add to their original bid of $184,500?

Did that not involve discussions of what Ms. Hayes, the state appointed co-chair of the State of Oregon Renewable Energy TaskForce would charge?  Obviously she did then in fact play a part in the contracting irrgularities at the ODOE, since at the end of the day, her negotiations triggered a $14,000 charge in excess of what the committee qualified expert said it would require to get the job done?

Maybe they are trying to hide those emails/meeting minute communications where those told they would never be part of the investigation....should now become part of a new investigation?  Who knows?

Hardly transparent though.

Is it just me or does John Kroger look incredibly tired?

When you hang-out with turkeys, it hard to soar with eagles.

 

02.14.2011 at 02:55 Reply

Isn't Kroger the same AG who refused to reveal the information to the Oregon Senate on his assistant and Riverkeeper buddy, Brent Foster, when asked in the Hood River scandal and the Columbia River LNG? Didn't his office tell the Senate minority party that it would cost $80 K or thereabouts to put out a redacted copy of "some" info, but not all? Hummmm.......

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close