No political advocacy group in the state has enjoyed greater success than Our Oregon in recent years.
In 2010, Our Oregon engineered the passage of Measures 66 and 67, two income-tax hikes that bucked a national trend.
In 2006 and 2008, the
group, which gets much of its funding from public-employee unions, won
more than half a dozen ballot measures.
Now a
group so new that it has little more than a name and a two-page draft
plan wants to be the next big player in Oregon politics—and its “action
plan” looks remarkably like Our Oregon’s.
One of those
responsible for Our Oregon’s 2005 creation—then-Oregon Education
Association lobbyist Chip Terhune—is helping steer the new group, which
comprises large businesses often at odds with Our Oregon.
State filings show
the new outfit, called “Grow Oregon,” was incorporated April 18, using
Wally Van Valkenburg, managing partner at the city’s largest law firm,
Stoel Rives, as agent.
People involved with Grow Oregon stress that the effort is in its infancy.
“It’s truly in
pre-start-up phase at this point,” says Justin Delaney, vice president
of legal and public affairs at the Standard, an insurance company that
is among Portland’s largest employers.
Delaney says he and
other large employer reps want to build on the 2011 Oregon Business
Plan, which business and political leaders wrote with a focus on
increasing employment and raising per-capita income to the national
average (Oregon lags by about 10 percentage points).
“This is not a partisan effort,” Delaney says. “We want to work toward job and wage growth.”
A two-page Grow Oregon document WW obtained
(see below) includes “The Grow Oregon Action Plan,” nine bullet-pointed headings on
how to build a political machine—something the business community
lacks.
The
plan, apparently contributed by Terhune, bears a striking resemblance to
the original blueprint Terhune and others created for Our Oregon.
(Terhune now works for Schnitzer Steel.)
“Whoever put this
together has a clear appreciation for what we do,” says Our Oregon
spokesman Scott Moore of the Grow Oregon document.
The Grow Oregon plan,
Moore says, describes Our Oregon’s approach: “electorate modeling,”
“targeting message delivery,” “using data to measure progress and
success” and “long-term strategic electoral planning.”
While
at OEA, Terhune arranged a big chunk of Our Oregon financing and helped
create a permanent, highly organized staff. (Terhune did not respond to
calls seeking comment for this article.)
Now,
a group that includes Schnitzer, the Standard, PacifiCorp, Portland
General Electric, NW Natural and, Delaney hopes, many of the state’s
other large employers, want to use Our Oregon’s approach to reverse the
business community’s losing record at the ballot box. (Grow Oregon hired
Laura Imeson as a fundraiser and tasked her to raise $1 million for the
2012 election cycle.)
Business interests
sought to eliminate Portland’s publicly financed elections in 2006,
recruited a candidate to unseat then-City Commissioner Erik Sten that
same year, twice failed at statewide efforts to make political primaries
nonpartisan, and last year pumped millions into losing efforts in the
governor’s race and statewide votes on tax hikes.
Businesses sometimes
win—they abolished Portland’s publicly financed elections in 2010—but
often, better-organized operations beat them.
Our Oregon’s Moore says his group is suspicious that terms such as “growing the economic pie” are code words for tax cuts.
“They say, ‘We’re
working for all Oregonians,’ but if you’re talking about tax cuts that
only benefit the top 5 percent of taxpayers or large corporations—and
that’s what these companies have advocated for in the past—that doesn’t
square,” Moore says.
But Delaney insists Grow Oregon will not continue the tax fight.
“This is not about taxes, and Grow Oregon is not about providing a counter to Our Oregon,” he says.
Delaney says the goal
is unleashing Oregon’s economic potential through a variety of
mechanisms—better education, lower healthcare costs and streamlined
regulation, among others.
Moore says Our Oregon will be watching.
“You can certainly
talk about how ‘We’re all in this together,’ but if the business
community pursues policies that only benefit a few, its results are
going to be the same,” Moore says.
Dear Mr. Moore,
Your quotes are a great demonstration of exactly why Grow Oregon and other groups are not only being established but actually finding early success. You could be so much more inclusive, but you instantly go to a rant on tax cuts without even knowing if that is their goal.
I support government's role and the role of teachers etc. etc. but I, my family, my friends, the majority of readers of this publication need jobs to live and there a lot of things we can do to encourage private sector job growth in this state. Those things are not attacks on public employees, but could instead bolster their positions as well. I am glad Grow Oregon is being formed and look forward to their efforts in pushing the Oregon Business Plan among other initiatives.
Try this quote next time... "We welcome any and all participants into the public debate. All together maybe we can find common solutions that will propel Oregon into a future that reflects its incredible heritage..." it is a little fluffy but I think you get my point...
Nigel-
This is an interesting piece, and I'm glad you wrote it. But it fails to address the real connection between the models of Our Oregon and Grow Oregon.
Kevin Looper (former Executive Director at Our Oregon) is currently at Stoel Rives. Clearly, you had to know this. I'm curious as to why you left that tidbit out of your story.