Four years ago, Eileen Brady considered at launching her
political career by challenging a two-term U.S. senator, Gordon Smith.
At the time, some—including this newspaper—suggested she run for mayor
of Portland (see
). Brady, a
co-founder of the New Seasons grocery store chain, did neither. But this
election cycle, Brady was first out of the gate to challenge Mayor Sam
Adams in next year’s City Hall elections. She got in before former City
Commissioner Charlie Hales entered the race, and before Adams surprised
the city by saying that he wouldn’t seek a second mayoral term.
no substance.....
Still very early in the race, but she has executive experience, which puts her ahead of someone like outgoing Mayor Adams. Earlier Mayor Potter had executive experience as police chief, but spent a career inside the city instead of on the receiving end of dumb, dumb decisions, so she knows what it means to run an organization AND be a citizen instead of a navel-gazing, love-the-smell-of-your-own-excrement city insider. Those two points alone puts her ahead of both our current and our most recent mayor. Makes me cautiously optimistic and looking forward to a good campaign season.
I really thought that Eilleen was sombody that had a grasp on the issues and clear thoughts and ideas how to resolve the problems Portland has created for itself with piece of the bureaucracy, lack of diversity, life time politicions, and poor city managment. The Mayor is a leadership position and unless you have clear and desisive plans how can you make any changes.
Her current company is profitable for the owners and has done wuite well in marketing a concept to Portlanders. Charging outragous prices for product you can buy through local farmers market and stores such as Sheridon's and Barbur's market just because it is cool and shiek and the hipster thing to do. If she can do that for Portland then awesome but it still will not help resolve our current issues.
The healthcare system is that she helped to create is a mess with more money going to the systme then the people who need it.
I don't know I think she has the right connections and has a great looking resume but very little substance.
I would like to know what is the real agenda here?
Are we looking at another self serving political want a bee or someone who really cares and is willing to take a tough stand form the start including cleaning house and starting form scratch
Until I read this interview and watched the video, this candidate was a clean slate for me. I have to say I was completely underwhelmed. I found myself hoping that Jefferson Smith runs.
It seems as if all Brady has in mind are her pet issues, like her apparent disrespect for the land use planning principles of our state and city. I highly doubt the rezoning situation on Division Street was as simple as Brady tells it. I just did some research, and found a story on indymedia called "Southeast Portland residents launch campaign to keep New Seasons out of their neighborhood" that tells of how the development and rezoning process allegedly forced people out of a duplex in order to accommodate the store. I'm not saying indymedia is right and she is wrong--I'm just saying there are two sides to every story, and if they truly spent $240,000 (or by her husband's account as he told the Oregonian, almost $300,000) in attorney fees, it was because of something controversial. And was the $240,000 just for the zoning change and dumpster awning permit, or for the entire permit process, including the building permit for the new store? If Brady and her husband are going to repeatedly state these claims, they should prove them by releasing the details. But in general it bothers me that she's basically saying we should have less public process when someone wants to change the nature of use on a property. That's counter to the Portland way, where we value citizen involvement in land use matters. If someone is proposing to put a large grocery dumpster right next to my house, I'd want the benefit of a full public process to make sure it's done right, and I suspect most citizens of Portland would as well.
In general, it just seems like Brady has the complaining down pat, but hasn't yet come up with any solutions.
Where was she an executive?
From her LinkedIn:
see all
Christian,
It's great that you're posting actual information but would be even better (and way more fair) if you posted complete information. You left out quite a bit from her linked in profile. All of it sounds like executive experience to me. Take a look:
Vice President Food and Farms Program
Ecotrust
Nonprofit; Environmental Services industry
2001 – 2005 (4 years)
While at Ecotrust, a non-profit conservation-based organization, Eileen launched the Food and Farms program, led the Salmon Nation program and served on the executive team. Programs launched included the Farmer-Chef Connection, the Vivid Picture project and SectionZ communications. All projects focused on job and entrepreneurial development with an emphasis on unifying urban and rural communities. She spoke regularly to community groups, university students, foundations, regional development groups on Building Regional Food
Operations Manager/Executive Producer
Platinum Technologies, Mastering Computers, Eagle River Interactive, Graphic Media, @once
E-Learning industry
1993 – 2000 (7 years)
Eileen led a team of software engineers, instructional designers and graphic artists through four mergers and acquisitions during the dot-com era. She championed a team that became known for being one of the first businesses to create and distribute on-line training classes.
Human Resource Director, Marketing Consultant, Executive Team
Nature's Fresh Northwest
Retail industry
1986 – 1991 (5 years)
Eileen served as an executive in the then nascent natural foods retail industry. She managed the hiring process of hundreds of people, working to increase wages and benefit packages every year. She was committed to building workplace and consumer cultures that are mission driven and community oriented.It's great that you're posting actual information but would be even better (and way more fair) if you posted complete information. You left out quite a bit from her linked in profile. All of it sounds like executive experience to me. Take a look:
Vice President Food and Farms Program
Ecotrust
Nonprofit; Environmental Services industry
2001 – 2005 (4 years)
While at Ecotrust, a non-profit conservation-based organization, Eileen launched the Food and Farms program, led the Salmon Nation program and served on the executive team. Programs launched included the Farmer-Chef Connection, the Vivid Picture project and SectionZ communications. All projects focused on job and entrepreneurial development with an emphasis on unifying urban and rural communities. She spoke regularly to community groups, university students, foundations, regional development groups on Building Regional Food
Operations Manager/Executive Producer
Platinum Technologies, Mastering Computers, Eagle River Interactive, Graphic Media, @once
E-Learning industry
1993 – 2000 (7 years)
Eileen led a team of software engineers, instructional designers and graphic artists through four mergers and acquisitions during the dot-com era. She championed a team that became known for being one of the first businesses to create and distribute on-line training classes.
Human Resource Director, Marketing Consultant, Executive Team
Nature's Fresh Northwest
Retail industry
1986 – 1991 (5 years)
Eileen served as an executive in the then nascent natural foods retail industry. She managed the hiring process of hundreds of people, working to increase wages and benefit packages every year. She was committed to building workplace and consumer cultures that are mission driven and community oriented.
I really appreciate how much Eileen focused on process over policy at this early stage of the game. I, for one, am eager to hear her take on policy, but that is only one side of the picture. Process and policy need to align to effect change, otherwise it is way too easy to lose the forest for the trees. A leader needs a touchstone to help him/her keep perspective. For Eileen, that touchstone is an explicit set of core values. And, if you look at the whole of her career, she has used those values to achieve her goals.
Oh,please. She was vague, evasive, and unprepared. As a woman and co-founder of New Seasons, she'll have a lot of Portlanders (including me) predisposed to vote for her. However, to clinch the deal she's going to have to be able to better answer questions about her posiions and plans . . . or develop a little more finesse when dodging questions. I'll chalk it up to rookie mistakes and hope that she'll improve as she gets better at campaigning.
Jeez, who has absolutely no concrete policy suggestions, but still wakes up and decides "I should run for Mayor!"? Its early in the fundraising/power player schmoozing, but she has been living in the city and hasn't done any research on these issues? Any and every candidate can throw these same "themes" out there. Maybe each candidate has one pet idea, but everyone is going to say they are for economic development, or for improving project implementation (even Adams). She says her campaign is "vision-driven" yet her vision is entirely "elect me and I will finally look at these problems with my super-executive abilities and fix them."
I wanted to find something in this interview to encourage me to support this candidate, but I agree: there was no substance there whatsoever. Too bad.