On Monday, Dec. 12, Occupy Portland plans to bus
hundreds of protesters to the Port of Portland’s marine terminals as
part of a coordinated effort by at least nine other local branches of
the Occupy Wall Street
movement to shut down West Coast ports.
The idea is to
protest “Wall Street on the waterfront,” says Kari Koch, an Occupier who
is helping plan the new protest. “The 1 percent owns much of what goes
on in the ports.”
The port shutdown was first proposed by Occupy Oakland “in solidarity” with striking longshoremen in Longview, Wash.
But the International
Longshore and Warehouse Union is publicly vowing not to participate in
Occupy’s shutdown nor honor the protest as a picket line.
The planned protest
reveals tensions between established labor unions and the upstart
movement claiming to represent “the 99 percent” of low- and
middle-income earners.
As much as the unions
try to benefit from the enthusiasm created by Occupy—and borrow its
slogans—they’d prefer to avoid arrest. The Occupiers, meanwhile, may
welcome union support, but disdain the unions’ embrace of party
politics.
The differences concern style and substance.
“If I wanted to shut
down the port, I could do it without Occupy. I don’t need ’em,” says
Jeff Smith, president of ILWU’s Columbia River District Council. “This
is a question for the Occupy movement: Why would I want to send my
people home? Why would I take a job away from somebody?
“I don’t get what
they’re thinking. It’s my job to put people to work. I’ve got jobs for
’em, so I’m going to put ’em to work. And I’m going to take some of Wall
Street’s money.”
Like many unions, the ILWU endorsed Occupy—until the new movement targeted the ports.
Occupy organizers
downplay the longshoremen’s rejection of their strike in a strange way:
Accusing union leaders of not telling the truth.
“The legal reality
for ILWU is they would open themselves up to being sued [if it endorsed
the port shutdown],” Koch says. “We totally understand that they are not
allowed to do that. We are in direct communication with them. We have
been working with the rank-and-file.”
Smith says no one from Occupy has called him, although he did get an email from someone whose name he doesn’t recall.
“As the president of
the local, I would say I run a pretty tight ship,” Smith says. “[Occupy
organizers] need to find somebody who is going to take the bull by the
horns and run it like an organization. How many people have you seen on
the news saying, ‘I’m the spokesman of Occupy Portland’? That’s frankly
why I don’t think it’s working.”
But Occupy rejects “hierarchy.”
“Occupy is a place
for the 89 percent of people who are not in unions,” says Koch, who is
unemployed but previously worked for a union-backed organization. “It’s
more representative of the working class at this particular moment.”
She and other Occupy
organizers are concerned about getting co-opted by the Democratic Party
in an election year. Events like the port shutdown, she says, establish
the movement’s independence.
And Koch says it’s a
sign of strength—not incoherence—that supporters of Republican
presidential candidate Ron Paul post messages on Occupy Portland’s
Facebook page. Sympathetic messages show up on Occupy’s “bat signal,” a
high-powered projector. At a Dec. 3 downtown protest, the bat signal
cast anti-capitalist slogans against the Southwest Park Avenue façade of
the Arlene Schnitzer Concert Hall, along with a libertarian rallying
cry: “End the Fed.”
Occupy’s open-source
ethos means its slogans are up for grabs. And organized labor has freely
partaken. Professionally printed window and yard placards are showing
up around Portland, saying “We Are the 99 Percent.” Many were
distributed by Working America, a Washington, D.C.-based affiliate of
the AFL-CIO.
AFL-CIO Oregon
spokeswoman Elana Guiney confirms that the union and its affiliates
produced “some signage” for people who supported Occupy. That said, she
knows some individual union members do expect to participate in Occupy’s
Dec. 12 port shutdown.
Despite some coordination on specific events, Guiney says, “Occupy is its own movement, and we are our own movement.”
I am quoted in this article.
I want to make it clear that i have in no way accused the ILWU of "not telling the truth." What I said is that the ILWU is legally unable to support this community picket. This is an action of Occupy Portland and that we understand the restrtictions that the unions are facing.
In fact, while the ledership of the ILWU and the int'l might not be able or willing to support this action, the rank and file workers have been extremely supportive of organizing this action.
We are targeting the wealth production of the 1%, and the ports are a part of that. Occupy Portland has consistently shown willingness to target the 1% where they make their wealth - whether that is banks or the ports.
There will always be disagreements between different components of the movement, blowing the disagreements out of proportion is inflamatory and unethical.
I would like the statement above about "not telling the truth" to be immediately retracted and corrected.
OPDX thought the cops were rough? Can't wait to see them tangle with some stevedores. Portland Police will look like ballroom dancers compared to the beat down they will get if they stand between a longshoreman and his shift.
True Mike, I wouldn't stand in the way of a angry 250lb longshoreman and his $100/hr job.
This article seems increditably misleading, since there is little to no evidence that the union wants to actually fear with occupy or doesn't actually sort them but can't strike due to union laws.
The state of journalism in Willamette Week is really quite sad.
You don't get it the Longshoremen get paid even if they don't cross the picket lines. They can not endorce the shut down because they would break their contract but in the end they can participate.
http://shutdowntheport.com/2011/12/07/ilwu-veterans-say-%E2%80%9Cwe-don%E2%80%99t-cross-community-picket-lines%E2%80%9D/
Thought it might interest y'all to see the clear support and potential clarification of some union members' positions on this action. Also, "Dreadlocks"? Come on. You all have tremendous power and ability to influence people as journalists, it's dissappointing to see it abused. Thanks. http://shutdowntheport.com/2011/12/07/ilwu-veterans-say-%E2%80%9Cwe-don%E2%80%99t-cross-community-picket-lines%E2%80%9D/
http://shutdowntheport.com/2011/12/07/ilwu-veterans-say-%E2%80%9Cwe-don%E2%80%99t-cross-community-picket-lines%E2%80%9D/ sorry if my link didn't make it into my post