Monday, February 13

Sam Adams is on Yelp

News The other day I noticed a curious tweet from our venerable mayor's Twitter account:Yes, Sam is tweet... More

Feb 13, 2012 01:20 pm by RUTH BROWN  | Comments 1
 

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 4
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 1
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 3
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · Letters to the Editor · Letters to the Editor 9/17/2003
September 17th, 2003 | Letters to the Editor
 

Letters to the Editor 9/17/2003

1 Comments
     
Tags:
YOU THINK WE EAT FUNNY?

Whether you think a raw-food diet is radical extremism or not ["Raw Power," WW, Sept. 3, 2003], the bottom line is that there is universal, widespread, unbiased and documented medical proof that vegans and vegetarians have a far lower risk of all diet-related diseases.

Yet most Americans, for some strange reason, insist on eating (or gorging) on a diet primarily consisting of dead animals and processed, adulterated food full of chemicals, pesticides, hormones, preservatives and GMOs. Then they get their stomachs stapled or have their chests sliced open and the fat scraped out of their arteries and think that's a perfectly normal way to live.

Andrew Marino
Beaverton

MEASURE 11 WORTH THE PRICE

Too bad they don't teach accounting in the liberal-arts colleges. In the Measure 11 item [WW, Sept. 10, 2003], Murmurs suffers from one-sided accounting. Murmurs complains that Measure 11 costs too much, presumably referring to the high prison-population support costs. What Murmurs neglects is the cost of not having the prisoners behind bars.

A crook must steal about $300,000 worth of car stereos to get $30,000 to live on for a year (fences don't pay much). Then they do another (maybe) $300,000 in property damage, plus the cost of time off trying to get things returned to normal. Similar problems arise for dope dealers, etc. It costs far less than $300,000 a year to house crooks in prison.

The taxpayer is far better off with the bad guys in jail. This is the reason the taxpayers vote in laws like Measure 11 and "Three Strikes You're Out."

C. N. Winningstad
Newport

HOUSEHOLD HOGS

While I encourage (and practice) water conservation, I also think it is not altogether appropriate to use "household" as the only comparative measure for your list of Hydro Hogs [Aug. 27, 2003].

For example, you state that the Millers, No. 7, live on a one-acre lot. The average Portland "household" lives on a one-sixth-acre lot, or less. So a water usage about six times the average household reflects primarily larger irrigation needs, not necessarily irresponsible use.

The diversity of families, lots, houses, landscaping, etc. throughout Portland neighborhoods is one of the city's treasures. And this diversity implies different needs for resources such as water. So please be a bit more thoughtful in your "analysis."

Sheila Mahan
Northeast 21st Avenue

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
09.17.2003 at 08:31 Reply
PGE Campaign Tactics I just received another brochure in the mail from PGE encouraging me to vote NO in the special election in October. What disturbed me about this was the realization that millions of dollars of rate-payers' money went into this campaign to present a single-minded perspective that in no way informed me about what the other perspectives had to say. As a ratepayer, I do not believe that this is a wise use of my money, especially when I am not being properly informed about ALL the facts. Peggy Fowler calls attention to "a small group of activists" supporting the measures, but precious little media space has been granted to this group and their perspectives, outside of the alternative press. So why spend the millions in rhetorical overkill just to point out something that should be self-evident to any conscious voter? Shame on you, Ms. Fowler. —Robert Douglass

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close