Tuesday, February 14

A Lovers' Guide to Tonight's Blazers/Wizards Game: An Almost Live Special Report

News I will not be live-blogging tonight's Blazers/Wizards Valentine's Day matchup (too busy being romant... More

Feb 14, 2012 05:05 pm by CASEY JARMAN  | Comments 0
 

Valentine's Day in the Naked City: Couple Arrested After Sex Role-Playing in Grocery Parking Lot

News A Northeast Portland couple took sex-in-a-car to new places in celebration of Valentine’s Day, muc... More

Feb 14, 2012 03:55 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 0
 

Washington State Senate Approves CRC Tolls

News A big step to raising money for the $3.5 billion Columbia River Crossing cleared its first vote Tues... More

Feb 14, 2012 01:03 pm by WW Staff  | Comments 0
 

Sam Adams is on Yelp

News The other day I noticed a curious tweet from our venerable mayor's Twitter account:Yes, Sam is tweet... More

Feb 13, 2012 01:20 pm by RUTH BROWN  | Comments 4
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · Rogue of the Week · Housing Authority of Portland
October 1st, 2003 WW Editorial Staff | Rogue of the Week
 

Housing Authority of Portland

6 Comments
     
Tags:
Richard Ellmyer says the Housing Authority of Portland has no business telling him who he can talk to. He has a point.
IMAGE: STEPHEN VOSS
Ah, democracy... what broad freedoms you afford us. The right to make fools of ourselves at Star Trek conventions, to waltz topless through Pioneer Courthouse Square or--barring a restraining order--to talk to anyone we please. Actually, if you're Richard Ellmyer, that last one gets a bit tricky.

Ellmyer is a vocal opponent of the Housing Authority of Portland's plans to pour hundreds of millions of public dollars into the Columbia Villa housing project in his neighborhood of Portsmouth. A very vocal opponent. When his monthly emails to the HAP board (and virtually every elected official in the county) started sucking up too much employee time, board chairman Howard Shapiro shot back this reply: "Any further questions or concerns you may have about HAP or the New Columbia project must be addressed to me."

Ellmyer only yelled louder. "It's a wrongheaded policy to say that people can't connect with city officials," he told WW.

Shapiro claims the housing authority isn't shutting Ellmyer down, only streamlining the public process as he becomes "increasingly acrimonious and confrontational" with the board. "We're saying the only way to get a response is to apply to the chair," Shapiro says.

We understand Shapiro's frustration. Although Ellmyer poses legitimate questions (his current crusade is to get HAP data broken down by neighborhood, not ZIP code), he frequently launches into personal attacks when things don't go his way. For example, when HAP spokeswoman Shelley Marchesi didn't forward an e-mail of his in a timely fashion, Ellmyer sent out a blistering message that called her "dishonest" and "unethical," intimated that she should be prosecuted for felony mail theft, and demanded she be fired.

In all honesty, if Ellmyer were sending the Rogue Desk the kinds of uncivil letters he sends to the people at HAP, we would tell him to leave us the hell alone. Public officials don't have that luxury.

As Ellmyer says, "These folks don't have to respond to my emails, they don't have to read them, but they can't stop them before they get there."

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
10.03.2003 at 10:00 Reply
If you can

 

10.03.2003 at 11:27 Reply
For The Record Bill Quinn, former HAP Board liason, and then Shelley Marchesi, Public Affairs Director, were sent and agreed to forward exactly fourteen (14, no 13) public policy related email messages from me to the HAP Board between March 1, 2002 and September 5, 2003. It takes about one minute to forward an email to a list of nine recipients. So, over a sixteen month period I requested and presumably got thirteen minutes of staff time to forward email messages to HAP's board of directors."When his monthly emails to the HAP board started sucking up too much employee time..."On the BS meter, with 10 = Whopping Pile of S..., HAP's complaint about taking "too much employee time" ranks 11.On the WW Staff Gullibility meter where 10 = accepting everything Jason Blair and George W. Bush have to say as gospel then WW Rogue writers get - well, you fill in the number.I have praised Shelley Marchesi's work in the past:From: Richard Ellmyer <ellmyer@macsolve.com>Date: Fri Jun 20, 2003 12:16:57 PM US/PacificTo: "Shelley Marchesi" <ShelleyM@hapdx.org>Subject: The Value of High CredibilityHi Shelley:Your reputation for promptness and honesty is well earned. I appreciate being kept up to date on your efforts. I believe that are doing your best to get the information as soon as you can. Thanks.RichardWW received a copy of this:From: Richard Ellmyer <ellmyer@macsolve.com>Date: Tue Sep 16, 2003 10:20:12 AM US/PacificTo: Shelley Marchesi <shelleyM@hapdx.org>Cc: Steve Rudman <stever@hapdx.org>, Paul Parker <paulp@hapdx.org>, Margaret Van Vliet <Margaret@hapdx.org>, Nick Fish <nf@meyerwyse.com>Subject: Who's Responsible?Hi Shelley:I am bewildered and considerably surprised by your atypical lack of response to my simple albeit important question: Did you forward my email of September 5th to all of HAP's board members on or before September 11th? Your silence is leading me to the logical and inescapable conclusion that your answer is NO. This is now my working assumption.Your cooperation and professional behavior in the past make me very reluctant to make you the sole focus of any public comments I might express on this matter. However, you will leave me no choice if you do not affirm that you have passed on my messages in a timely fashion, as has been our long time understanding, or that some superior of yours ordered you not to perform this task.Please correct any misconceptions I may have about your role in this matter before 5 PM today. Thank you.Richard EllmyerPraise when it's warranted, condemnation when it's appropriate. I like Shelley Marchesi. But, Shelley Marchesi committed a dishonest and unethical act when she refused to pass on my email to the board and then refused to tell me. You call it what you will. I call it dishonest and unethical. She had every opportunity to tell me that she was ordered not to pass on my emails. She didn't.WW did a service to our community by talking about this issue. For that you deserve credit and my personal thanks. I'm sorry that your colleagues at the Oregonian haven't yet risen to your level of enlightenment. —Richard Ellmyer

 

10.04.2003 at 11:42 Reply
Rogue? According to the logic of this piece the national do not call registry would merit Rogue status. Freedom of speech includes the freedom not to listen. —K. Slipsager

 

12.21.2006 at 03:29 Reply
DA
I think that DICK Ellmyer is someone that the community should pity because he certainly does not seem to be well.

He apparently enjoys drawing attention to himself more than he does solving any real problems that are not his own.

 

01.22.2007 at 06:15 Reply
DA
http://www.bloggerradio.com/2007/01/richard_ellmyer.html

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines