Monday, February 13

Sam Adams is on Yelp

News The other day I noticed a curious tweet from our venerable mayor's Twitter account:Yes, Sam is tweet... More

Feb 13, 2012 01:20 pm by RUTH BROWN  | Comments 1
 

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 4
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 1
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 3
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · Rogue of the Week · Port of Portland
May 5th, 2004 WW Editorial Staff | Rogue of the Week
 

Port of Portland

3 Comments
     
Tags:
If you've ever rushed to catch a plane and been delayed by the security line at Portland International Airport, you may have been too rattled to notice the roguish discrimination practiced by the Port of Portland.

The airport is a public facility built with public money. The security checkpoint is paid for and manned by the federal Transportation Security Administration. Public facilities and bodies are supposed to provide equal service to all, regardless of race, sex or religion.

And yet, if you're not a first-class passenger or a frequent flier, you are a second-class citizen at PDX, subject to standing in long lines while others breeze through a special checkpoint. That's right, at airport security gates, there's an express lane for those holding first- or business-class tickets or a card showing membership. (Airport employees and disabled travelers also get to use the expedited service, which seems fair.)

Airport spokesman Steve Johnson says the preferential treatment began after 9/11, when lines were excruciatingly slow and airlines feared a loss of business. "They came to us with a proposal, and we accepted," Johnson says.

Johnson concedes that the airport and security apparatus are publicly funded but notes that gates, concourses and other parts of the airport are paid for by the airlines.

That shouldn't make it OK to give their best customers special rights.

Using the port's logic, Phil Knight could reserve the best seat on the Blue Line out of Beaverton, because Nike, as one of the region's largest employers, kicks in more payroll taxes to keep TriMet trains running than do most other businesses. Developer Pete Mark could demand extra time at City Council hearings, since he ponies up a heftier business income tax.

Johnson adds that, of the 12 million passengers who have flown in and out the airport since the signs went up, only eight have complained. Make that nine.

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
05.04.2004 at 09:00 Reply
Quit your WhiningIt is nice to know that somebody somewhere doesn't have to wait in those lines. There is always someone that will complain over anothers good fortune.—dan maher

 

05.04.2004 at 09:00 Reply
Pretty weakWay to write a totally unpersuasive column. Considering yourself one of the nine people out of 12 million who have complained is a weak effort and pointing out a problem at best.Your hyperbole in the second to last paragraph is laughable. Also using the logic of the port that you point out, if I have more money to spend on public parking in downtown Portland, as opposed to parking way out in the sticks and riding my bike into town, then I deserve to park my car there. Is that a problem, much less discrimination? What's funny is that Phil Knight and Pete Mark don't engage in the scenarios that you dream up.Quit the hypotheticals and poor rhetoric and give us a real argument as to why the port acts roguishly.—Chris

 

05.06.2004 at 09:00 Reply
Walk in my shoesThere is nothing Rogueish about letting frequent flyers bypass the sometimes extended lines at security. I make on average 40 business trips a year, and often I don't have the luxury of arriving hours before my flight leaves. This bypass lane recognizes that frequent business travelers not only make up the bulk of the profitable fares for the airlines, and generally are pressed for time, but they also know the "routine" at security and pass through it in a fraction of the time that the occasional leisure traveler does.—Jeff Parrish

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close