Monday, February 13

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 4
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 1
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 2
 

Almost Live: Rockets at Blazers

News So I'm having a bit of trouble with the picture, which is coming from my phone (I drew it on my way ... More

Feb 8, 2012 07:09 pm by CASEY JARMAN  | Comments 0
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · Rogue of the Week · Robb Wochnick
October 13th, 2004 WW Editorial Staff | Rogue of the Week
 

Robb Wochnick

12 Comments
     
Tags:
Here at Rogue Central, we spend hours purging junk emails with titles like "Hot Teen on Teen Action at the Pentagon!" We damn the perpetrators with vile curses. If we ever found out our boss was planting cyberfilth on our computer--well, our vengeance would know no bounds.

Yet this is precisely the situation one woman, whom we'll call Sara, found herself in when she signed on to work for the roguish Robb Wochnick.

According to a recent report by Oregon's Bureau of Labor and Industries, Wochnick hired Sara in January 2000 as the office manager of his Wilsonville business, Sports Warehouse, which sells sports memorabilia through eBay.

Working all day on her computer, Sara got used to deleting the deluge of pornographic spam she was getting in her email.

But she soon noticed a new phenomenon. When she arrived at work some days, a full-screen image of naked men and women having sex would greet her--something that made her feel "instant disgust." She also had to endure Wochnick's obscene jokes and unwanted back rubs, which he wouldn't stop even when asked. On one occasion, after she'd left a bag of clothes behind, she found that it had been rifled through, and her "small lacy teddy" was in the office washing machine.

On May 4, 2001, the situation reached a...um, climax. When Sara arrived at work, she not only found a porn website open on her computer, but also noticed a substance on her desk she suspected was semen and a "used tea towel" on the floor. Disgusted, she locked her computer with a password. Wochnick flipped, and he refused to promise to stop accessing naughty sites. Sara had to quit, and filed a complaint.

On Aug. 31, 2004, labor commissioner Dan Gardner found in her favor, saying that Wochnick "repeatedly and intentionally left [Sara's] computer screen so that [she] was unavoidably exposed to pornography against her will." Gardner ordered Wochnick to pay $1,200 in back wages and $40,000 in penalties.

Wochnick plans to appeal the ruling and claims BOLI, which deemed his testimony "internally inconsistent, self-serving, and...generally unbelievable," blocked the truth in the case.

"What we have is a case of the bleeding-heart liberals in Oregon running a kangaroo court through BOLI and not letting acceptable evidence go through," he says. "You tell me how to resolve spam, and I'll do it."

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
10.14.2004 at 09:00 Reply
More liberal nonsenseSurprise surprise. Willamette Week, one of the most liberally biased news sources around, thinks that attacking this man for not being able to stop spam makes him a "rogue". I guess when it comes from a liberal, it MUST be true.—RJ Reynolds

 

10.18.2004 at 09:00 Reply
SpamYou know, you only get spam like that from previously visiting pornograpic sites so it sounds to me like this guy used her computer after work hours to access porn sites and now she is getting all kinds of spam. A lot of these sites only require that you have a valid email address and then you can access the site, so maybe he just gave them her email address for his own personal pleasures. By the way, if you don't like what WW has to say in their opinion based columns I would suggest that you not subject yourself to reading it and let others enjoy without your mindless posts that do nothing but "shoot the messenger". Maybe you should stick to a newspaper that other close-minded people such as yourself read.—L

 

11.09.2004 at 10:00 Reply
SpamLooks like a typical one sided Liberal view your taking on this subject.It seems the employee mentioned makes a habit of filing claims...You should take the time to mention the employee in question here was selling porno photos of herself on company time to company clients.Did you forget to mention this or does that not come under responsible reporting?. Kind of makes you wonder?—J.Callahan

 

11.15.2004 at 10:00 Reply
spamThis woman sounds like a real "Gold-digger" to me.Why don't you mention her name in your article.Are you afraid of something? I would assume you'd want to be fair and equal here?.Isn't that your journalistic duty?—CBC

 

11.17.2004 at 10:00 Reply
BOLIMaybe BOLI should spend a little more time on helping stop spam than then beating up on inncocent oregon based companies with petty claims.No wonder business in Oregon sucks.They have no chance in the current environment workplace as unemployment continues to rise.—Charles Johnson

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close