Monday, February 13

Sam Adams is on Yelp

News The other day I noticed a curious tweet from our venerable mayor's Twitter account:Yes, Sam is tweet... More

Feb 13, 2012 01:20 pm by RUTH BROWN  | Comments 1
 

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 4
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 1
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 3
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · Q & A · LESLIE FRANE
August 31st, 2005 Ryan Hume | Q & A
 

LESLIE FRANE

This Labor Day, one union leader is confident organized labor can pick up the pieces.

5 Comments
     
Tags:
LESLIE FRANE
IMAGE: MATT WONG
Leslie Frane, executive director of Oregon's Service Employees International Union Local 503 since 2002, is used to bad news in the American labor movement.

The share of U.S. workers who belong to unions has dropped since 1983 from one in five to one in eight, though that spiral has leveled off in Oregon.

And in July, seven major labor unions, including the growing SEIU, withdrew from the AFL-CIO in a national split that raises questions about labor's ability to stick together in politics and to avoid raiding other unions for members.

With Labor Day weekend at hand, Frane discussed unions' relevance in an economy shifting from manufacturing to services, what unions can do to reverse membership trends and the future for organized labor.

WW: Are unions irrelevant in today's economy?

Leslie Frane: Workers need unions more than ever. Globalization, the concentration of corporate power, and the rightward shift in the political climate mean that individual workers have no influence over their wages and working conditions unless they act in groups, preferably large groups. In the workplace and in politics, unions are the one mechanism existing today that enables large numbers of workers to speak in one voice.

Why, then, do the numbers reflect the opposite, with unions having a smaller share of the workforce?

Because opposition is so much stronger. Most unorganized workers, given the free choice, would choose to join unions if the choice was not constrained, but they're met with vigorous opposition.

Aren't unions playing defense and actually being forced to have their members pay more for health care?

Our union's experience is that even in today's tough environment, we can make progress. A good example is the 12,000 home-care workers our local represents. Four years ago, they had no health insurance at all. Now, they have fully paid health care. Effective next year, they will also have fully paid dental insurance, vision coverage, and the ability to purchase coverage for dependents. These workers no longer go to bed at night worried they are one illness away from destitution.

So many new jobs aren't keeping up with the cost of living. How does labor fight that?

We need to organize workers in low-wage jobs so that we can transform those jobs into family-wage jobs...organizing nursing-home workers, janitors, health-care workers and child-care workers-workers in sectors that are growing, sectors where workers are desperately undercompensated for the work they do. We also need to improve the standards of our existing members, including public employees. People are often shocked to learn that thousands of our state employees qualify for food stamps or other public benefits.

How does the SEIU's focus on international labor cooperation help the American worker?

If workers in other countries earn more, then employers in this country have much less incentive to outsource American jobs.... In our international work, we focus on companies that have employees both in this country and abroad. We are working with unions in Europe that represent bus drivers and security workers employed by the same companies that employ bus drivers and security workers in this country. What's crazy is that some of these companies respect unions in Europe but try to bust unions here. And since American labor law is so incredibly pro-business, too often they get away with it.

And now you've got the split from the AFL-CIO.

I don't think most of us were surprised by what happened. The debate within the AFL has been going on for a few years. We announced our disaffiliation when it became clear that the leadership of the AFL was not willing to make substantive change. The crisis facing American workers in today's economy is so dire that we couldn't wait. We're often told that patience is a virtue, but when the percentage of workers in unions is in freefall, there's such a thing as too much patience.

Where would you like to see labor in 10 years?

I'd like to see us reverse the trend so that the percentage of workers in unions increases incrementally each year. I'd like to see the political climate shift so that we can pass labor-law reform enabling workers to decide whether or not to join a union without coercion from employers. I'd like to see the standard of living of working Oregonians increase, so that workers have affordable health care and a greater share of the state's wealth than they have today. If we accomplished those three things, it would feel like a decade well spent.


SEIU Local 503 ( www.seiu503.org ) represents about 30,000 service workers in Oregon.

In February 1887, Oregon became the first state to make Labor Day a legal holiday. It was celebrated on the first Saturday in June.

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
08.30.2005 at 09:00 Reply
ya sure you speak for all workers!!! you know better then I do about what I want out of my job."Why, then, do the numbers reflect the opposite, with unions having a smaller share of the workforce?Because opposition is so much stronger. Most unorganized workers, given the free choice, would choose to join unions if the choice was not constrained, but they're met with vigorous opposition."actually thats not the answer, people choose not to join the union because the union does not actually represent the individual. no one can speak for me better then I can thank you.—hoffa mao

 

09.07.2006 at 06:59 Reply
Leslie Frane should be an expert to talk about corporate structure...SEIU is definitetly a top down organization with a high paid administration that makes all the critical decisions with the illusion to the rank and file that they are a member driven union...Cattle are driven...Members should get the chance to run their own union instead of high paid administrators such as herself.

SEIU administrators and staff are voting members of the rank and file...They should be hired help...The staff has their own separate and independent union (PERU) represented by the CWA and bargain their own contract with the administration of SEIU.

SEIU "announced" their disaffiliation with the AFL-CIO because they didn't have the votes to get out...Andrew Stern, the International President picked up his marbles and walked out along with the Laborers,UFCW, UNITE, HERE and the Carpenters (who came back in just long enough to leave again). This move just made the American labor movement more watered down and less effective when we don't all stand together. Labor union density in the U.S. is at an all time low of around 8% now and SEIU is going global...To up the wages in third world countries just to get more dues money from those poor unrepresented souls...It will not help bring the world standard of labor high enough to keep from outsourcing American family wage jobs.

SEIU 503 in Oregon is subsidizing all their lower paid workers on the backs of the public employees they represent by exhorbitant union dues...Not a flat rate...currently 1.75% of the workers gross pay.

SEIU 503 in Oregon just got rid of their affiliation agreement with the Oregon Public Employees Union so when dues increase time comes around there will no longer be a vote required of each member in Oregon. It will be taken care of every four years by a handful of hand picked, half staff and purple clones to represent Oregon at the International Convention every four years. Look out SEIU 503 Oregon members you are in for the ride and disappointment of your life.

A Disgusted Represented SEIU 503 Person

 

09.08.2006 at 02:24 Reply
I have to agree with the person who said that SEIU 503 is top down ran. They try to sell the union in any way possible even lieing to the potential member. The staff at 503 have to have a union to represent themselves, because 503 mistreats thier employees just like the so called "Big Buck Employers" whos employees they say need a union for job protection. Organizers are throw away employees, check out the employee overturn 503 has. Injured on the job to bad, 503 represents the employees that work for SAIF. So if they(503)wants you to have workers comp you'll get it, if not you won't. SEIU 503 needs to practice what it preaches.

Seen it, lived it, no longer believe in it.

 

09.08.2006 at 10:42 Reply
[quote]Q: "Why, then, do the numbers reflect the opposite, with unions having a smaller share of the workforce?

Frane: Because opposition is so much stronger. Most unorganized workers, given the free choice, would choose to join unions if the choice was not constrained, but they're met with vigorous opposition.[/quote]

If SEIU and the rest of the corporate union "leaders" really believed in free choice, they'd support and allow votes to both get in AND get out of the union. They don't for obvious reasons. Without doubt workers could use a labor movement that represents their interests, attracts their support and avoids non-working issues that divide and dilute solidarity. Would that we had leaders with the strength and courage and wisdom to be servants to the rank and file -- not top-down corporates who cannot hope to truly serve labor (assuming that's even among their priorities).

 

01.27.2009 at 06:43 Reply
American workers are being fooled by business who says you don't need unions, but as the standard of living for American workers decline as they have done for the past 20 years, Unions are needed to change the trend. Business is always trying to create a contentious environment pitting worker against worker in a frenetic race for the bottom. Workers need to unite and say "that is not good enough for me, my family, or my co-workers.

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close