Tuesday, February 14

Sam Adams is on Yelp

News The other day I noticed a curious tweet from our venerable mayor's Twitter account:Yes, Sam is tweet... More

Feb 13, 2012 01:20 pm by RUTH BROWN  | Comments 1
 

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 4
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 1
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 3
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · Rogue of the Week · Hogil Pharmaceutical Corporation
March 1st, 2006 ADRIAN CHEN | Rogue of the Week
 

Hogil Pharmaceutical Corporation

7 Comments
     
Tags:
Big Pharma certainly is entitled to profit from others' ills. But this week's Rogue takes that to an absurd extreme with its shameless attempt at cashing in on meth-related hysteria.

New York-based Hogil Pharmaceutical Corporation pitches Sine-Off, a brand of over-the-counter cough and sinus medication available locally at Fred Meyer, Kmart and other stores.

You may have heard the spots on Portland radio that claim the medicine tackles sneezing, fever, housefires and vandalism. The product website (www.sineoff.com) boasts how Sine-Off "works to fight colds, flus, sinus congestion and the devastating effects of Meth abuse."

No, Sine-Off won't help a meth-head kick the habit. What it does is deprive addicts of one product that's been used to make their drug of choice, because Sine-Off was reformulated last year. It now uses phenylephrine as its active ingredient in lieu of the meth-precursor pseudoephedrine. Is the move sheer corporate altruism, as Hogil might have us believe?

"We're not about cashing in on anyone's misfortune," says Hogil spokesman Sean Evans. And to Hogil's credit, it has donated some money to the nonprofit Partnership for a Drug-Free America (Evans declined to specify the amount).

But suggesting the company didn't have one eye squarely on the bottom line when it made the switch—and started an ad campaign that says Sine-Off fights meth abuse—is BS. Oregon and more than 35 other states have severely restricted the sale of medications containing pseudoephedrine. Similar federal laws are in the works. A switch to phenylephrine therefore means more sales, which Hogil isn't the only drug company to realize. Pfizer already has a phenylephrine-based Sudafed on the market, while brands from Vicks to Alka-Seltzer are also releasing pseudoephedrine-free products. The only thing unique about Sine-Off is that the entire line is pseudoephedrine-free, while other brands still make some products using the ingredient.

But if a lack of pseudoephedrine makes something "anti-meth," WW has those suckers beat: We've been pseudoephedrine-free since 1974. No reformulations necessary.

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
02.28.2006 at 10:00 Reply
Hogil Pharmaceutical CorporationPseudoephedrine-free since 1974? I find it diffucult to believe that none of your employees used any of this product during that time. A case of trying to be too cute. —Jenny Talia

 

02.28.2006 at 10:00 Reply
Hogil Pharmaceutical CorporationAre you kidding? I find their slogan thought provoking and intelligent much more than roguish. Let's take a closer and less critical look. First, they identify the primary, health related reasons that you'd buy their product. Then, they highlight a larger social goal that their product helps advance. WW calls this out as "BS"; I say they're right. Simple, really: if they can convince you to buy their product, then you, the consumer, are choosing a non-pseudoephedrine medication over the medications that can be used to make meth. Assuming that there is a finite market for sinus medication, if you buy from them then you've just not bought another type of sinus medication. If nobody buys sinus medication that contains pseudoephedrine for their colds, it could be enough to drive demand down so that it no longer makes sense for other stores to sell. If that happens, then it isn't available for persons who want to use it to make meth.Just because they'll benefit economically from people buying their product doesn't mean they are a rogue. I don't recall the last time I saw an advertisement that didn't emphasize aspects of the product in way that was designed to get my attention. —Ben

 

03.01.2006 at 10:00 Reply
Hogil Pharmaceutical CorporationWo, you missed the mark on this so-called "Rogue".—Corey

 

03.01.2006 at 10:00 Reply
Hogil Pharmaceutical CorporationUsually I agree with a lot of the rogues, but I didnt agree with this one.—mick

 

03.02.2006 at 10:00 Reply
Hogil Pharmaceutical CorporationI am sorry....but not one pharm company made anyone make meth....its all about choices you make and the consequences of them!—Mike

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close