Monday, February 13

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 3
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 1
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 2
 

Almost Live: Rockets at Blazers

News So I'm having a bit of trouble with the picture, which is coming from my phone (I drew it on my way ... More

Feb 8, 2012 07:09 pm by CASEY JARMAN  | Comments 0
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · Letters to the Editor · LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
April 26th, 2006 WW Editorial Staff | Letters to the Editor
 

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

4/26/2006

1 Comments
     
Tags:
MEDIA ON METH

I have read your article on the exaggeration of meth abuse ["Meth Madness," March 22, 2006] and I am glad someone is finally publishing the truth.

I consider myself to be somewhat media-savvy. I read Poynter and Editor & Publisher but I am not a reporter or blogger and often read George Seldes, Marshall McLuhan and Noam Chomsky.

However, I have been thoroughly confounded by this meth issue. The NPR radio show On the Media had a guest on several weeks back who claimed that the hysteria regarding the meth epidemic was just that. The follow week, On the Media (perhaps the least biased show on NPR) pulled the story and apologized to listeners. However, they had no reason to apologize in that the story was spot-on.

A few weeks later, I am watching probably one of the finest programs on television, Frontline, and there it is again: the Meth Epidemic. Now, despite everything I had read to that point, I am thinking maybe On the Media was correct to retract; surely Frontline wouldn't follow the hysteria down the bunny hole if there was no there there.

Then I came to the realization that the sourcing all seemed to come from Oregon—and specifically from The Oregonian. Living in the east, I deferred but quietly thought, "What if The Oregonian was wrong?"

Lo and behold, your article has lifted the fog. Now I do believe the commentator on On the Media and am happy someone is correcting the record.

Ralph Talarico
Jersey City, N.J.

CORRECTION

Last week's Rogue of the Week mischaracterized the position of Sen. Doug Whitsett (R-Klamath Falls). In fact, Whitsett's letter to the Oregon Public Utility Commission strongly enouraged full implementation of Senate Bill 408. His letter said, in part, "It appears that the only businesses that oppose this new law are the utilities being regulated. The fact is that PacifiCorp was caught with their hand in the taxpayers' cookie jar. In my opinion, the OPUC temporary rule regarding SB 408 is an appropriate attempt to implement the exact intent of the 73rd Legislature. Utilities must not charge rate payers in Oregon for taxes that are not paid in Oregon." WW regrets the error.

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
04.25.2006 at 09:00 Reply
LETTERS TO THE EDITORI find it interesting that the "Media on Meth" was written by someone in New Jersey. Guess to find someone to agree with you, it would have to be someone far enough away to be unable to smell the increasing stench of meth on the train and unable hear the conversations about who they robbed, what they bought, what they smoked and "what the hell you lookin' at?" I guess Ralph has never had a 911 operator on a friday night say that unless weapons are involved, the police are really busy tonight and probably won't get to your problem. I had a friend who's vehicle was stolen and they said they'd mail him a form to fill out. Like all crimes are accounted for? If the Oregonian can't prove their numbers are right, how can the Willamette week prove they're wrong? We live with the reality of it and can see it around us every day. It's real. It's doesn't matter what numbers someone has on paper. I find it sad that Willamette Week seems to find that sticking it to the man and hate for the Oregonian are more important that honest journalism and accurately portraying the truth. What next? Think you guys can write away our increasing gang problem too? Maybe then I won't have to listen to the conversation on the train that crushing bones and killing someone is "more fun than sex".—Pam Wilkinson

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close