Monday, February 13

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 3
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 1
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 2
 

Almost Live: Rockets at Blazers

News So I'm having a bit of trouble with the picture, which is coming from my phone (I drew it on my way ... More

Feb 8, 2012 07:09 pm by CASEY JARMAN  | Comments 0
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · News · Wayne's World
June 28th, 2006 Andra Brosy | News
 

Wayne's World

A Rogue so explosive that we needed extra space for it: House Majority Leader Wayne Scott.

13 Comments
     
Tags:
House Majority Leader Wayne Scott faces a firestorm over what he's done in the Legislature for his fireworks company.
CORRECTION WW made errors in a June 28, 2006, story it published about state House Majority Leader Wayne Scott (R-Canby) and his fireworks company, Western Fireworks. The story had to do with Senate Bill 667-A and an amendment that benefited one fireworks company to the exclusion of others. Our story said that the company that benefited from the bill (which is called Western Display) is owned by Scott and that Scott sponsored the legislation. While Scott owns a fireworks company (called Western Fireworks) and records show that it is a source of fireworks for Western Display, there is no factual support for the statement that he owns Western Display. While Scott was the only legislator to testify in favor of the bill in a House committee and carried the bill (meaning he was the floor manager) in the House, there is no factual support for the statement that he sponsored the legislation. It was sponsored by Sen. Kurt Schrader (D-Canby). We regret the errors.

For the past three years, small Oregon fireworks companies say they've been reduced to ashes by one politically connected competitor.

The company is Western Fireworks, whose president is House Majority Leader Wayne Scott (R-Canby), this week's Rogue.

Whether you stock up on sparklers this Fourth of July or snag a seat at bigger-boom displays, the company supplying the fireworks will probably be Scott's, which claims to be Oregon's largest.

But some of Scott's smaller competitors say he has long abused his power in the Legislature to cement his company's position of dominance while leaving them struggling to stay afloat. Here's how:

In the 2003 Legislature, lawmakers passed Senate Bill 667-A, a seemingly innocuous bill dealing with nonagricultural operations on land zoned for exclusive farm use.

The bill included an amendment from Scott that lets his aerial fireworks company, which puts on Fourth of July shows at venues such as the Blues Festival on the Willamette and Oaks Park, operate regularly on farmland instead of needing to get temporary-use permits each year from local authorities. Typical fireworks operations on farmland that require permits include storing fireworks as well as testing, shipping or directly selling them.

But the bill applied only to aerial fireworks companies in continuous operation on land zoned for exclusive farm use since Dec. 31, 1986. And Western was the only business that met that standard, according to at least two legislators who voted for SB667-A, Sen. Gary George (R-McMinnville) and Rep. Gary Hansen (D-Portland).

Nick Smith, a spokesman for the House Majority Leader office, says the bill was written to ensure that Western would be able to continue operating in Scott's Clackamas County district but adds, "Rep. Scott has never used his public office to promote his business or potentially disadvantage his competitors."

Dan Tanner, owner of Tannerite Fireworks, which has operated since 1992 in Lane County, says his business and other fireworks operations should also be able to operate regularly on farmland, instead of needing to get temporary permits each year that let them avoid the hassle of selling their wares outside Oregon. Conditional-use permits can be hard to get because they can include public hearings where neighboring property owners can object.

Tanner says his fireworks company and dozens of others hoped their plight would spur the 2005 Legislature to pass a bill allowing businesses like theirs to use farmland for storing or selling their products.

For these companies, Tanner says, operating on farmland can make or break their business because farmland is cheaper and it's hard to find industrial land that's safe enough for storage.

Rural areas are obviously the safest place to store explosives, says Rep. Tom Butler (R-Ontario), who sponsored House Bill 3349, which would have made it easier for a fireworks company near Brogan, within his Eastern Oregon district, to get local land-use permits.

"There is not a better place on earth to have a magazine than Brogan," Butler says, referring to the above-ground bunkers used to store explosives. "There's nothing there except gravestones."

Hansen, who co-sponsored House Bill 2876, another 2005 effort to help the smaller fireworks companies, says, "If we let one company operate in a farm zone, the same reasons and motives should apply to other companies."

Yet both bills died.

Hansen's bill never got a committee hearing or work session. Butler's bill passed the House and Senate but died in the Rules Committee at the end of session because the House leadership wasn't going to let it out of that committee, according to committee chair Sen. Kate Brown (D-Portland), the Senate majority leader.

Smith noted that Scott voted for Butler's bill on the House floor but would not say if he worked to block it from advancing out of the Rules Committee.

Meanwhile, as July 4 nears, Tanner remains as bitter about SB667-A as he was three years ago.

"Anybody that reads it can see it's crooked and rotten to the core," Tanner says.

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
06.27.2006 at 09:00 Reply
Wayne's WorldYou guys should do your research before your print articles such as this. If you would have researched the facts Wayne Scott does not own an aerial fireworks company. I suggest you print the truth not lies that you choose to believe. —Shelley Vissers

 

06.28.2006 at 09:00 Reply
Wayne's WorldScott IS closely tied to the fireworks company, Western Fireworks. He gains financially. They are more than good friends. He doesn't have to be the owner for what he has done to be blatently unethical at best. He knows exactly what he has done to these small business people. I attended ALL 10+ hours of Senate hearing testimonies from these pyrotechnics. They are horror stories of abuse by the State Fire Marshall's office whose actions were supposedly based upon Wayne Scott's legislation. Some of them have had their property seized repeatedly even though everything they have done has been legal, federally approved and licensed. They have never been charged with any crimes, but they've been treated like criminals. These people had evidence to back up their testimonies. The OFMO didn't dispute their testimony. OFMO's testimony indicated unbelievable coldness and willful intent to ruin any chances of timely processing of licenses. This was always just before July 4th. Willfully poor excuses have been used to ruin their businesses and livlihoods. Wayne Scott doesn't give a damn. If he did then all he'd have to do is produce and support legislation to correct the problem. Instead he has thwarted it. He can fix the problem any time. He refuses. Explain that. Want more detailed info? Go to www.oregonconservative.com and read the report at the middle of the home page where it says "Repost of Articles by Request" in red.—CC

 

06.28.2006 at 09:00 Reply
Wayne's WorldWhere does it say he owns it? It says he is PRESIDENT. Do you dispute that?—readclosely

 

06.28.2006 at 09:00 Reply
Wayne's WorldAlso, you might want to mention that YOU, Ms. Vissers, appear to be one of the owners of Western Fireworks...—Full Disclosure

 

06.30.2006 at 09:00 Reply
Wayne's WorldI don't get it. Democrat Senator Kurt Scrader (D-Canby) was the sole sponsor of Senate Bill 667. Rep. Scott beat Schrader wife, Martha, in a race for the House seat he holds. So, Schrader is doing no favors for Scott. Yet Scott, as a freshman legislator, is the bad guy for a bill that doesn't even have his fingerprints on it. Can someone explain why Scott is being blamed for Schrader's bill? Schrader introduced it and carried it on the floor of the Senate. Scott only voted for it after properly declaring a POTENTIAL conflict of interest as required. Sure seems you're barking (intentionally) up the wrong tree.—Anon

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close