Tuesday, February 14

A Lovers' Guide to Tonight's Blazers/Wizards Game: An Almost Live Special Report

News I will not be live-blogging tonight's Blazers/Wizards Valentine's Day matchup (too busy being romant... More

Feb 14, 2012 05:05 pm by CASEY JARMAN  | Comments 0
 

Valentine's Day in the Naked City: Couple Arrested After Sex Role-Playing in Grocery Parking Lot

News A Northeast Portland couple took sex-in-a-car to new places in celebration of Valentine’s Day, muc... More

Feb 14, 2012 03:55 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 0
 

Washington State Senate Approves CRC Tolls

News A big step to raising money for the $3.5 billion Columbia River Crossing cleared its first vote Tues... More

Feb 14, 2012 01:03 pm by WW Staff  | Comments 0
 

Sam Adams is on Yelp

News The other day I noticed a curious tweet from our venerable mayor's Twitter account:Yes, Sam is tweet... More

Feb 13, 2012 01:20 pm by RUTH BROWN  | Comments 4
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · News · Underhand Serve?
January 31st, 2007 Ian Demsky | News
 

Underhand Serve?

Allegations surface that another Multnomah County sheriff's employee intervened in legal matters for personal reasons.

7 Comments
     
Tags:

IMAGE: THOMAS COBB
Multnomah County Sheriff Bernie Giusto's pick for a new key post in the county's jails faces ethical questions after intervening in a court case involving her brother-in-law.

The question of personal intervention by law enforcement isn't a new one for the sheriff's office, given that Giusto himself helped arrange an alcohol intervention and denied a handgun-license application for businessman Jim Jeddeloh, whose ex-wife is a close friend of Giusto. The state Department of Justice found earlier this year that Giusto's actions were unusual but fell within the legal scope of his job.

Giusto appointed Susan Lambert-Gates, a deputy with 21 years experience, to the new position of jail detective late last year. The move followed a highly critical report by the county district attorney's office that said the sheriff wasn't sending them enough cases of assaults and other crimes committed by prisoners.

WW has learned Lambert-Gates arrested a witness who was going to testify against her brother-in-law in 2005 as the witness was headed into the courtroom. While neither the sheriff's office nor the district attorney pursued the matter, the incident raises questions about whether she improperly used her sworn position to try to help a close relative.

"If it wasn't her brother-in-law and she was on duty and just happened to recognize an offender with an outstanding warrant, she should be getting a commendation for outstanding police work," says William Gaut, a Florida-based legal consultant with more than 25 years of law-enforcement experience. "But this gives the appearance of acting in a manner contrary to the justice system..., of using the color of office to influence the outcome of a trial."

Lambert-Gates says she was compelled to make an arrest after receiving a tip about the warrant. (She declined to disclose the source.)

"I don't see [a conflict] at all," she says. "I've arrested family members in the past."

The arrest came on April 26, 2005, when Gregory Dee Smith was scheduled to testify on behalf of his landlord in an eviction case. One of those being evicted from the Northeast Portland home was Jon Gates, Deputy Lambert-Gates' brother-in-law. Smith's housemates knew Smith had an outstanding warrant, which led to his arrest before he could enter pro tem Circuit Judge Terry Hannon's courtroom.

"I knew they would try something like this, because they didn't want me to testify," Smith said in court. The judge let Smith testify before being hauled off on the warrant, which was for a probation violation in a DUII case.

Susan Lambert-Gates now says that Smith would never have been prevented from testifying.

The landlord won the case and won $5,000 to cover his attorney's fees. In his written ruling, the judge wrote that he considered Smith's arrest a retaliatory act on the part of the ousted tenants.

Bills provided by the landlord, Casey Moreland, say his attorney, Dudley Gaouette, had conversations about Lambert-Gates' actions with the county district attorney's office and sheriff's internal affairs unit two days after Smith's arrest.

The sheriff's office decided against a formal investigation into Lambert-Gates' actions: They "were not outside the agency policy, as she had a duty to act once an arrest warrant was discovered," according to an internal affairs file.

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
01.31.2007 at 02:04 Reply
what in the hell is going on with so-called "law-enforcement" in

this area? There is not a week goes by that WE THE PEOPLE

aren't treated to an unending parade of "law-losers" that either

act in questionable manners, abuse their power, misbehave in

manners that we get the rest of us jailed, and display their near

constant disregard for ethics and professionalism. It has come

to the point that I have little regard for anyone in so-called "law-

enforcement" in this area, for they refuse to clean up their own

nest and willingly tolerate the worst whitetrash-style behavior, as

so amply displayed this Jail Witch that Bernie-the-Banger has put

in her job...leaving us to wonder WHAT she did to get the job if

she is so willing to compromise ethics to "unlawfully assist" her

brother-in-law. I say to hell with these damned disgusting turds

that wear batches and seek to garner our RESPECT...how about

earning it, dummies and not demanding it or expecting it...get up

off your asses and clean out your own fouled nest and rid it of

the trashy elements.

 

02.01.2007 at 05:48 Reply
Ahhhh, Bernie is such a delight. As crooked is, crooked does. Another fine example of the D A not patrolling all of Portland's citizenry. "Conflict of Interest", not in puddletown.

 

02.01.2007 at 11:35 Reply
where is Mike Skank when we need him? How come Multnomah

County District Attorney isn't all over Bernie on this

one...???

Does he play favoritism, give out "get-out-of-jail" cards

and suck-up to like-minded turds that only "enforce" the

law...to hell with obeying such!

 

02.02.2007 at 08:48 Reply
CZ
Merely because Deputy Lambert-Gates lawfully arrested Mr. Smith for an outstanding arrest warrant does not create an ethical violation. But it begs the question, why is a jail detective enforcing laws outside of the jail? Unless she was going to testify in a criminal case, she should not be in the courthouse policing anything. Obviously, her presence raises suspicion.

This is nothing new for the Sheriff's Office which routinely conducts law enforcement operations where it is not paid to be providing service. The sheriff is supposed to provide law enforcement to the unincorporated areas of the county. Good luck finding one in the gorge or even Wapato Jail. You might check one of the cities of Portland, Gresham, or Troutdale.

 

02.02.2007 at 11:03 Reply
CZ: At the time of the 2005 incident, Deputy Lambert-Gates worked at the courthouse. She has since been given as assignement at the jails.

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close