Monday, February 13

Sam Adams is on Yelp

News The other day I noticed a curious tweet from our venerable mayor's Twitter account:Yes, Sam is tweet... More

Feb 13, 2012 01:20 pm by RUTH BROWN  | Comments 1
 

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 4
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 1
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 3
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · Rogue of the Week · Plaid Pantry
March 14th, 2007 James Pitkin And Kyle Cassidy | Rogue of the Week
 

Plaid Pantry

13 Comments
     
Tags:
What's the opposite? WW intern and Steel Reserve enthusiast Kyle Cassidy reaps the fruits of his labor.
IMAGE: maggie gardner
Hitting your local Plaid Pantry on a beer run? Better put on a new shirt.

The Beaverton-based convenience-store chain has long had a policy against selling alcohol to "people with dirty and disheveled clothing who may have been sleeping in the street." But to enforce it? After all, making Plaid Pantry clerks judge whether our jeans are clean enough to buy a 40-ouncer seems absurd.

But Ed Johnson, a homeless-rights lawyer in Portland, reports that one of his clients was denied beer at a Gresham Plaid Pantry just two weeks ago.

"What really bugs me is just the spiteful sort of stereotype," Johnson says.

Us, too. So for its leap of sartorial logic, Plaid Pantry earns this week's Rogue dishonors. Even after it turned out, when we sent an intern undercover, that you never know whether the policy is going to be enforced.

Plaid Pantry's president Chris Girard says he's under pressure from the Oregon Liquor Control Commission, the City of Portland, police and neighborhood groups not to sell to street drinkers. The chain has 100 stores statewide, mainly in Portland.

"Dirty and disheveled—that is our internal language to describe someone who appears to be a transient, homeless, chronic street alcoholic," Girard says. "Most transient, homeless, chronic alcoholic street people are disheveled. I don't mean to be offensive, but I can see that."

But who's to say whether one adult customer's disheveled look means they can't buy beer?

"Just because somebody is homeless or appears homeless doesn't mean they don't have a place where they can drink a beer inside, like [at] a friend's," Johnson says.

When Johnson's homeless client was refused service in Gresham, the man complained to the store clerk. The clerk handed him a one-page policy statement from corporate HQ stating, "It is the strict policy of Plaid Pantry that we do not sell alcohol to homeless street drinkers."

Besides the "dirty and disheveled," it bars sales to customers who "have all of their possessions in a shopping cart."

Girard admits customers might be singled out by mistake. But he stands by the 10-year-old policy, which in its latest update still includes "disheveled" as a sign someone is intoxicated. "We are probably more restrictive than anyone else, but that is our position," he says. "We follow the policy much more aggressively in known problem areas."

The kicker to all this came when we dressed an intern in shabby clothes, dragged him through the dirt, and sent him on a morning beer run throughout Portland last Friday, March 9.

Five Plaid Pantrys sold beer to the intern, who was so dirty and disheveled (see photo) he drew stares even on the streets of Portland. He had no trouble loading up on 24-ounce cans of Olde English 800, Steel Reserve and Schlitz Bull Ice at Plaid Pantries on East Burnside Street, Southeast Grand Avenue, Northeast 16th Avenue and Northwest Glisan Street.

The policy tells clerks to ask for ID from customers who "may be a street drinker." If their address is near the store, they "may not be inclined to drink on the street" and it's OK to make the sale. WW's intern got carded at every store, but with his Washington license showing he was 27 years old, they sold him the beer.

Girard declined to comment on his clerks' performance enforcing the rules. But he doesn't plan to make any changes. At least Plaid Pantry is hiring some clerks who are usually smart enough not to be wasting everybody's time enforcing its Roguish rule.

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
03.14.2007 at 07:20 Reply
Where's the photo of Kyle? All I see in that thumbnail is a street sign.

 

03.14.2007 at 10:41 Reply
Why is Plaids policy a problem? They are a private business and should be able to make their own policies. If someone doesn't like it they should buy their beer somewhere else. There are businesses I don't frequent because of their stance on certain subjects. I don't know that I have personally bought beer at a convenience store in my whole life so maybe there is something I'm missing here. When I buy beer it is in the grocery store while shopping for the weeks food. If I were an alcoholic I may make stops to a convenience store in an area where folks didn't know me so I could drink in the closet. If I lived on the streets or under a bridge I may buy beer at a convenience store, but aren't these the problem drinkers the store policy is trying to stop? Isn't the policy they are using trying to help the drinkers as well as the greater public? I think more businesses should step up and take a greater role in helping curb nuisance drinking.

 

03.14.2007 at 11:30 Reply
WW must think people are idiots. Months ago WW tried to convince people that its intern was a bicycle thief. Not surprisingly, the ploy didn't work. Next WW tried to convince PP clerks that another intern was homeless, "dirty and disheveled". Not surprisingly, the ploy didn't work again.

If WW would spend less time trying to create news and more time reporting the news, it would be a more credible publication.

 

03.14.2007 at 02:11 Reply
Plaid Pantry must have the "We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone" sign on the door. So, what's the point? It's a privately-owned business.

 

03.14.2007 at 04:48 Reply
Calling Plaid Pantry stores your ‘rogue of the week’ because they unevenly apply a policy to limit sales to street drinkers misses the point. Plaid, as well as many convenience stores has resisted attempts to limit the sale of fortified alcohol citing restraint of trade issues. Fortified beer and wines exist for only two purposes: to get you smashed, cheaply. Secondly, create a profitable line of beverages that pander to the poor urban male. However, the cheap high isn’t shared by those around you. We as a community have to deal with the aggressive behavior, public urination, Legal and Medical costs. Chris Gerard and Co. simply pocket the cash and head off to the bank.

Several years ago, a student at Trinity College in Connecticut did a study of the related costs of fortified alcohol. (http://www.trincoll.edu/depts/tcn/Research_Reports/student%20research/s001_fortified_alcohol_moore.htm ). By their reckoning, for every dollar spent of fortified alcohol, $7.37 in costs are passed on to the community. While I don’t accept the students $7.32 as gospel, his point is not to be lost. The merchants make the profit, the community takes the loss.

So every market, the distributors, the brewers who make these swills collectively deserve your ‘rogue award”. And we as a community deserve a Nero award, for doing nothing as the dealers profit on our inaction.

Chris Gerard is not a dumb man. He knows you don’t have to DO good, just LOOK like you are doing good.

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close