Monday, February 13

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 4
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 1
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 2
 

Almost Live: Rockets at Blazers

News So I'm having a bit of trouble with the picture, which is coming from my phone (I drew it on my way ... More

Feb 8, 2012 07:09 pm by CASEY JARMAN  | Comments 0
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · News · The Anti-Protester
March 21st, 2007 JAMES PITKIN | News
 

The Anti-Protester

WW tests the limits of Portland's tolerance by sending a reporter posed as a war supporter to last week's antiwar rally.

72 Comments
     
Tags:
when doves decry: One antiwar marcher didn't like pro-war dissent at Sunday's rally.
IMAGE: BrianLeephoto.com
About 15,000 Portlanders spent last Sunday afternoon rallying against the war in Iraq. I know of only three people who came out to support the war. I know, because I was one of them.

Carrying a Day-Glo orange sign that said, "Osama loves PDX liberals" and "Real Americans don't cut and run," I posed as a war supporter who wandered into a sea of war opponents at the rally March 18 in the South Park Blocks.

(I wore a freshly ironed blue shirt and tie. The Oregonian, which noted my presence as a counter-protester in its next-day story about the rally, correctly quoted the sign but called the shirt color white.)

Why do it? Because in a town that claims to believe in free speech, WW wanted to see what happens to those who don't parrot the popular line.

What followed was an hour and a half of ridicule, threats and condescension—peppered by a few high-fives from antiwar marchers for "having balls."

Once in the crowd, I easily attracted controversy, constantly approached by people either bemused or irate. No one touched me, and I never argued or shouted back.

But the limits of some Portlanders' tolerance quickly became apparent from protesters' comments:

"I think you should get the hell out of here before you get killed."

"Why are you even here? Just leave."

"Look, kids, that's the guy who likes the war. He's bad."

"Nice shirt. Nice tie. Fascist."

"You look just like a fucking Republican. The only thing missing is your head up Bush's ass."

The most common suggestion was to enlist in the military and go fight the war. Dozens of protesters branded me a "chicken hawk," as did a local blogger who posted photos after the rally.

But some also clearly relished the opportunity to engage the enemy. Lines formed of people waiting to get a piece. They questioned U.S. foreign policy and my morality like they were talking to a stubborn schoolkid. They suggested I "do some reading."

"A lot of people are brainwashed by Fox News and Rush Limbaugh, and he's one of them," Peter Wylie, a 59-year-old photographer, told WW intern Nicholas Deshais, who followed me as a reporter to help with chronicling what happened.

Others were more welcoming, shaking hands and thanking me for showing up.

"He has every right under the First Amendment to express himself, but he is so far wrong," said Peter Hamer, a 49-year-old Navy veteran.

I was hugged by hippie chicks, handed free DVDs and hit on by a man in a pink fairy suit.

I was also accused more than once of being an "agent provocateur," planted by police to incite conflict. But conservatives may have found the protesters' signs—like "Hang Bush" and "Fuck corporate America"—just as inflammatory as the protesters found mine.

Deshais and I met two other pro-war protesters, after I changed my clothes, lost the sign and morphed back into straight reporting.

Steve Richards, 32, stood on Southwest Madison Street with a

sign reading, "Hey hippies—peace is not the answer, ask Hitler." As marchers took turns confronting him, Richards said he'd "been personally insulted 11 times."

Karen Addie of Milwaukie stood on Pioneer Courthouse Square with a pro-war sign, screaming at marchers to "remember what this country was built on." A 50-year-old mother of a son fighting in Afghanistan, she said the crowd was "mean," but didn't feel dissuaded.

"I believe in what I'm saying," Addie told the crowd. "I know I'm right. We need to pull together."

WW's day of protesting ended when I stepped out of a portable toilet at the rally and found my sign, which I'd left outside, torn up and stuffed in a trash can. I'll know better next year.

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
03.21.2007 at 05:11 Reply
Nice story! Different approach to covering a demonstration, irony without being arrogant. Amamzing how dissenters seem intolerant of those who dissent from them.

 

03.21.2007 at 07:33 Reply
Finally - some very INTERESTING reporting. I personally hate 90% of rallies for any political/moral/environmental position one way or the other. I echo this reporters observations/impressions they usually about people wanting to express their own personal rage/angst/un-dealt-with personal issues/desire to relive the 60's/desire to belong to something/sheep followers/etc. The usual 'information' given out at rallies are often a half-step from propaganda, and I have yet to see (outside of one migrant rights march in CA run by the *gasp* Catholics) rallies as being about trying to open a meaningful and intelligent dialog or bringing opposing sides together peacefully and constructively.

"fuck bush", "osama loves liberals", etc. Yes, very intelligent - you're both convincing me to listen to your well-thought out and constructive feedback.

 

03.21.2007 at 08:14 Reply
Next Father's Day you should go to the Gay Pride Parade with a sign saying somehing like "Homosexuality is Immoral" or maybe "God Hates Fags" and see what kind of response you get. In other words, what did you expect to receive from those willingly marched in an anti-war parade?

Anyone who carries a sign that opposes what the other 15,000 people are giving their time and energy to support should expect a few rude comments and shouts of derision.

Try spitting into the wind and you'll get the same kind of reaction. Big deal. No news here.

 

03.21.2007 at 08:24 Reply
KLo
I have so many issues with both the article and the first two comments...

First off, who speaks for the "town"?, as in..."Because in a town that claims to believe in free speech". What an assumption! That's like saying "America believes in free speech". Well, my take is that different people have different views on free speech. I'm not aware of any "town" spokesperson?! That's assumption #1.

Assumption #2 - the responses you received were portrayed as opposing free speech. I would submit that you got more of what you asked for. My logic is as follows...people march to exercise their free speech, idiot-planted-agent provocateur reporter (how ironic that they called you on it, even if you weren't there for the fuzz/pig/fascist cops) shows up and exercises his (fake) free speech, marchers respond with more free speech. You got more, not less!

You quickly switched your arguement to one of tolerence instead of free speech. Tolerence is different than free speech, duh! No doy! People can be intolerent and still allow you to practice your hateful free speech (on both sides). People don't have to agree, or even like what each other have to say to practice free speech.

I don't consider this innovative reporting, it's more sophomoric.

To Tom Boardman, you said "Amamzing how dissenters seem intolerant of those who dissent from them." Check your facts Tom, those opposing the war are THE MAJORITY in this country (by a wide margin), not dissenters. So, anyone who is for the war is actually a dissenter.

To matt, I'm sorry you are so apathetic. I think you miss the point of rallies/marches. While I agree many people are acting on emotional impulses, the real goal is to affect change, not open a dialogue. Mostly they want their message heard and understood so that their elected officials will act to change the issue/problem. And no, I don't think most are trying to live out some 60s fantasy. That's quite laughable actually. If you'd been to a rally recently you'd see that most people weren't even alive in the 60s. I think more people want to affect change to stop needless killing rather than live out some fantasy about being a hippie. Really man, get serious.

 

03.21.2007 at 08:31 Reply
I am one of the protesters who confronted you. I am a Vietnam vet, West Point grad, and retired military. Effete jerks like you who will not serve because "I have better things to do" (your words) are repulsive and repugnant to anyone except first class hypocrites. For your information, I found the foul signs, especially the "Fuck the Troops" (which, unfortunately I only saw on-line) equally repugnant. Both you and these anarchists are cowards no matter how you justify your actions. If you are pro war fine; that is your right. You cross the line when you have never served, allow those less fortunate to serve in your place, and you flames the fires of war. Your College Republican attire said it all. They all say they have other things to do.

By the way, it was obvious that you were taking notes for something and that you were not there alone. You were not looking for constructive feedback in any way, shape or form. You were there to agitate and you did. Big man you are.

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close