Friday, February 10

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 0
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 0
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 1
 

Almost Live: Rockets at Blazers

News So I'm having a bit of trouble with the picture, which is coming from my phone (I drew it on my way ... More

Feb 8, 2012 07:09 pm by CASEY JARMAN  | Comments 0
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · News · Going postal
March 28th, 2007 Christian Gaston | News
 

Going postal

Look what's in an already-controversial mail delivery contract.

25 Comments
     
Tags:
Message delivered: Letter carriers are protesting the increased use of contractors to deliver the mail.
IMAGE: Photo courtesy of National Association of Letter Carriers
Beaverton Postmaster John Lee told the letter carrier's union in January that he was hiring a contractor for delivery in a Beaverton-area suburb because he thought it could save $33,878 a year ("You've Got Mail," WW, March 14, 2007).

But that's hard to believe given that records show the contractor, Christopher Onuliak, is getting $12,279 for a four-month "emergency contract." That means Onuliak is netting $118 for each day of delivery to 20 mailboxes in the Arbor Parc suburb.

"That doesn't sound cheaper than having a city carrier deliver those, which would take them about 15 minutes," says Linda Smith, secretary treasurer for Branch 82 of the National Association of Letter Carriers. "There's a letter carrier that drives right by there that should be making those deliveries."

Kerry Jeffrey, Portland spokesman for the

U.S. Postal Service, isn't sure of the current numbers of Arbor Parc deliveries but expects that number will expand and that the postal service will save money. He would not provide specifics of those savings.

"It's kind of tough to do an apple-and-orange with a contract route and regular street delivery," Jeffrey says. "It might be a good deal [for the contractor] right at the beginning."

The deal is also a family affair. Onuliak is the son of Mike Onuliak, a manager at the Beaverton post office. That's allowed as long as Christopher Onuliak is over 21 and not living at home, according to USPS internal purchasing guidelines. Records show Onuliak is 22 and with a different address than Michael Onuliak.

"It really shocks me that a relative of that supervisor has that contract,'' says Paul Price, national business agent for the letter carriers union.

Jeffrey says there's no conflict with the post office's nepotism rules. Contract negotiations were done in the USPS's Seattle office and Christopher Onuliak is a contractor who answers to different managers, not working directly beneath his father.

"We all have relatives that work in different facets of the post office," Jeffrey says. "There's an old joke about providing full-family employment."

Union officials are steamed over the contracted delivery in Arbor Parc because they see it as the first local occurrence of a nationwide push by the USPS to broaden outsourced mail delivery beyond its traditional use in remote locations.

The union-management fight has escalated since the recent decision to outsource 10 routes in Reno, Nev., previously delivered by full-time carriers. Those routes were outsourced after management failed to receive bids from full-time employees.

"What normally happens when a route does not get bid is they promote a part-time employee and make them a full-time employee," Smith says, "so for them to take routes that do not get bid and to contract them out is a major development."

Smith says the union's Postal Operation Manual previously allowed outsourcing delivery only in "sparsely populated" areas. But the union says USPS took out that language, a decision that became apparent when more routes began being contracted out in late 2006.

USPS's Jeffrey says the post office is trying to maintain its current service level by saving money when there are 1.2 million new delivery points each year.

Jeffrey says the post office expects the contract in Arbor Parc to eventually include 370 addresses, and that postal officials are looking at new developments in Orenco as possible sites for more contract routes.

"It depends on how much development goes on and the economy," Jeffrey says. "Ultimately it could be a few thousand deliveries."

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
03.29.2007 at 09:02 Reply
I get the jist of this article. Unions don't like it when companies outsource labor. I'd rather the USPS outsource if it means the cost of a stamp won't go up AGAIN. Besides, aren't unions a bit outdated?? What is the point of labor laws and OSHA if we need mob-like organizations to "oversee" their members?? Shouldn't employees get recognized based on their individual performace rather than mass-strong-arming of the hand the feeds them? Why shouldn't a union compete for the same buisness an individual can do? Isn't that the point of a free market and minimum wage labor laws??

Seems to me you have at least one HUGE inaccuracy in your data. The contract dollar amount is $12,279 for a FULL YEAR - not a 4 month contract. Meaning the four month contract Mr. Onuliak has is only $4,093, which nets $40/day. If the current union members were willing to work for that I'm sure the post office would have cancelled the need to outsource.

Can I say BFD that Chris Onuliak is the son of Mike Onuliak? And the point of NAMING the father/son? Are you at all familiar with union tactics?? Couldn't you have said the contract went to a TWENTY-THREE year old son of a current postal employee and left it at that?? Also, am pretty sure the contract posting was available to ALL postal workers (and GENERAL PUBLIC) so any famiy member could share with a compliant member. If the decision was made in Seattle and not the Beaverton PO then what is the relevance? Your point carries the same amount of relevance as Colin Powell son working for the FCC...

Seems to me WW is trying to stir up an already heated pot of water. Was the article written by a due paying journalistic union member??? A BIT one sided.

 

03.29.2007 at 11:17 Reply
jennifer- you are wrong the contract is for the 12,000. dollar range and that is for 4 months because it is on an emergency contract. at the end of the 4 months if he keeps it , it will incurr anouther 12,000. So a years worth will be about 49,000. pretty good huh? they should have promoted the serior Part time flexible into that position just like they have done over the years. The union will greive it and win and will have to pay the carriers for all time that was given to the non-postal worker. This is not a true emergency because the service HAD people that were qualified to do this work.

 

03.29.2007 at 11:46 Reply
Your comments make no sense. Why would anyone want to work for less than minimum wage? Why should the part time carriers not have the opportunity to go full time? That is what they are taking away when they contract routes. How would you know that the emergency contract was for 4 months or a full year? Are you related as well? Sister, wife, mother?

 

03.29.2007 at 01:09 Reply
even if you pay $40 a day for 15 houses, that's a lot of money for 15 min of work. i hope we hear the other side of the story. but for now this is the story and this contracting out is not going to work. managers just want to hire family members that can't qualify for the post office job that's why they want this RCA to hire unqualified undignified workers...

 

03.29.2007 at 01:26 Reply
your full name must be jennifer onuliak

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close