Monday, February 13

Sam Adams is on Yelp

News The other day I noticed a curious tweet from our venerable mayor's Twitter account:Yes, Sam is tweet... More

Feb 13, 2012 01:20 pm by RUTH BROWN  | Comments 1
 

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 4
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 1
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 3
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · News · Fired Up Again
June 6th, 2007 Jake Thomas | News
 

Fired Up Again

Signature gatherers hit Portland streets with a new pot initiative.

2 Comments
     
Tags:
Spark up the signature gatherers for another marijuana initiative in Portland.

This initiative comes a year after another marijuana-related ballot proposal that would have mandated Portland police mellow out on marijuana crime fell well short of the needed 26,691 valid signatures.

But organizers of this more recent initiative are optimistic about qualifying for the November 2008 ballot, saying they're better organized this time.

"I've never run a campaign I've failed to qualify," says chief petitioner Parker Bell, a longtime signature gatherer who was fined $2,500 in 2004 (see "A Signature Issue," WW, Feb. 8, 2006).

His proposal aims to exempt adults carrying less than two ounces of pot outside their homes—and inside Portland city limits—from state marijuana laws. Growers also would be allowed three plants in total, and could keep up to eight ounces in their home when the plants are harvested.

The proposal also would bar Portland police officers from cooperating with state or federal marijuana enforcement.

The proposed 2006 initiative was more general, only relegating marijuana crimes to the city's lowest law enforcement priority. Bell says he will go door to door to gather signatures instead of focusing on high-traffic public places like last year's initiative. Bell says his approach yields a higher validation rate.

Even if the newer proposal makes the ballot and voters approve it, police are dubious about how they could decline working with federal or state law enforcement on marijuana trafficking when that trafficking often includes other drugs not covered by the initiative.

"I don't know how you would effectively comply with that," says Portland Police spokesman Sgt. Brian Schmautz.

The Multnomah County District Attorney's office declined to comment, citing its role as the preparer of the ballot title. And the state attorney general's office also declined comment, saying it had not had an opportunity to analyze the proposal.

Currently, state law says possessing less than an ounce of marijuana subjects you to a fine of $500 up to a maximum of $1,000. Over an ounce, and you're looking at a potential 10-year prison sentence and $100,000 fine.

Bell was originally going to work with local marijuana activist Melodie Silverwolf and Madeline Martinez, executive director of the Oregon Chapter of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws. The three went as far as filing an initiative under Martinez and Silverwolf's names, but didn't get any further.

Both say they won't work with Bell on this initiative because they don't want marijuana decriminalized for felons and do want to limit the amount of marijuana that could be harvested from plants to three ounces instead of eight ounces.

Martinez also cites an inability to raise money for the effort.

Bell has received less than $500 in donations from local businesses, primarily head shops and businesses in Southeast Portland.

But he says he has several fundraisers planned for the summer, and that the 2,000 signatures already gathered in less than two months by volunteers convinces him that "I can probably do it on a volunteer effort."

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
06.06.2007 at 02:56 Reply
I love this idea, but Denver has had a law similar to this for a couple of years now. Instead of charging people at the city level, they simply charge them at the county or state level. The law hasn't made much difference as far as I know. SAFER attempted last year to change the state law, but voters didn't pass the initiative.

If you want to get rid of cannabis laws, the fastest cheapest way to do it is through your vote as a juror. As a juror, you hold more power than even the president with regard to vetoing laws. see www.fija.org, and know your rights and responsibilities.

Good luck with this initiative, but I'm telling you, for as much effort as it will take, law enforcement will only find ways to skirt the will of the voters.

Logos

 

06.12.2007 at 01:20 Reply
J
We need to pass a law that puts marijuana crimes at the lowest priority for city police. Check out this article about Seattle's initiative from 2005. They have about 50 marijuana related arrests a year, WWeek cites about 900+ for Portland.

Shoudln't we direct our local police to focus on more serious crimes? For example, I had my mail stolen a few years back and it resulted in my identiy being stolen 3 times (Credit and debit card compromises). I was told by Portland detectives that the culprit would probably not spend any time in jail. And he had a machine to make fake credit cards based on the info they stole from my mailbox. Shouldn't we stop wasting our police resources on marijuana related crimes?

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/249424_marijuana23.html

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close