Monday, February 13

Grimm Recap: Made in Organ and The MILF Huntress

Movies & Television Grimm, Season 1, Episode 10: “Organ Grinder”Beast of the Week: Geiers, goblins with vulture-like... More

Feb 13, 2012 12:54 pm by MATTHEW SINGER  | Comments 0
 

See That Wieden+Kennedy Super Bowl Ad With Clint Eastwood? It Was Directed by David Gordon Green

Plus it was written by Lents poet Matthew Dickman

Movies & Television Another Super Bowl, another PR coup for Wieden+Kennedy. By overwhelming consensus, the ad agency's "... More

Feb 6, 2012 12:35 pm by Aaron Mesh  | Comments 6
 

The Dream of the 1890s is Alive in Portland

Movies & Television We don't make a habit of posting Portlandia clips, but if you don't find this funny, you have no sou... More

Feb 2, 2012 12:33 pm by Ruth Brown  | Comments 10
 

Before You Watch The Grey, Watch These Three Movies

Movies & Television With its bloody Liam Neeson-on-wolf action, blockbuster The Grey, which opens in cinemas today, is g... More

Jan 27, 2012 02:10 pm by WW Arts & Culture Staff  | Comments 1
 
 
 
Home · Articles · Movies · Movie Reviews & Stories · Physician, Heal Thyself
June 27th, 2007 AARON MESH | Movie Reviews & Stories
 

Physician, Heal Thyself

A kinder, gentler Michael Moore still stings a little.

14 Comments
     
Tags:

In trying to decipher how Michael Moore has achieved his widespread popularity in the face of a somewhat cavalier attitude toward factual precision, there's no underestimating his savvy choice of targets. General Motors, the gun lobby, George W. Bush: That's an impressive rogue's gallery by any standard, and if Moore has falsely impugned the reputation of, say, Dick Cheney, no innocent blood runs in the streets. His latest smear campaign, Sicko, has in its crosshairs the most reprehensible villain yet: the health-insurance industry, a numbers racket disguised as a medical service. I hate Providence, you hate Kaiser Permanente: How can anyone root for an industry that does no end of harm?

But Sicko also comes with what everyone agrees is a gentler, more reasonable Michael Moore. Like the politicians he shreds, Moore is attempting a reinvention of his persona. Recognizing that harassing corporate flacks and banging on D.C. doors annoys as many people as it persuades, he has cast himself as a matured voice of reason. Gone are the days of separating the sheep from the goats; this time, Moore wants the whole barnyard to unite behind universal health care.

To some degree, this tactical shift works. The first half of Sicko is a forceful complaint, in no small part because Moore's jolly, self-promoting face—like Santa Claus on a PR tour—is nowhere to be seen. Instead, we meet the victims of HMO deceit, who line up to tell wrenching stories of lost mortgages, legal loopholes and dead relatives. Their compelling anecdotes are juxtaposed with some authentically funny japes, including a list of uninsurable diseases stylized as Star Wars opening credits. (The proletariat strikes back, basically.) None of this could be mistaken by anyone with the slightest intelligence for a nuanced policy discussion, but it's an effective broadside, and fairly entertaining. It's also too good to last.

"The reformer is always right about what is wrong," the essayist G.K. Chesterton wrote in 1891. "He is generally wrong about what is right." Beginning a century later, Michael Moore has made a lucrative career out of proving Chesterton's point. (Let us all look back fondly on Fahrenheit 9/11 and its adorable children frolicking in the bucolic streets of Saddam's Iraq.) And it turns out that Moore has just as hard a time curing his own ailments. As Sicko drags into its second hour, he exchanges his old standby of hyperbolic accusations for a cloying credulity. Shouldering his way to the center of the screen, Moore visits Canada, England, France and Cuba, and in his travels makes some shocking discoveries. Canadian hospitals have short lines? Astounding! British doctors make house calls? Remarkable! The French government provides free nannies and carrot stew? C'est magnifique! Cuban officials are eager to provide comprehensive medical care to Americans with cameras? Splendid!

But what's actually amazing about Sicko is that a provocateur as canny as Moore is so disdainful of his audience. His idea of offering solutions is to accept, without question, the policies of other nations, and his ideal viewer is someone who is actually as naïve as he pretends to be. The movie reaches its nadir when Moore features the 1996 Congressional testimony of Humana claims agent Linda Peeno—a rather brave moment, actually, since she revealed how her bosses were betraying their clients—and Moore scores it to the lush, hymnal tones of Samuel Barber's Adagio for Strings (you know, the music from Platoon?). Is this a joke, a clever parody of the manipulative power of propaganda? No, it's just very bad propaganda. And it reveals a man who, even when he's restraining himself, thinks so little of his admirers that he feeds them the most transparent sentimental appeals.

We live in a nation run by duplicitous scoundrels, and it's understandably tempting to rally behind a public figure who brashly challenges them. But in cheering for Michael Moore—a fake populist and an authentic liar—you're only rooting for another bad guy. As a country, we can do better than our current health care system. And we can do better than this movie. ?


Sicko is rated PG-13. It opens Friday at Lloyd Cinema, Eastport, Fox Tower.
 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
06.27.2007 at 03:37 Reply
Aaron Mesh writes as one of those angry "Moore-haters" (see Bush-haters), which is why his review of "Sicko" depends so heavily on ad hominem rants.

When he describes Moore as suffering from a "somewhat cavalier attitude toward factual precision," Mesh seems unaware that Moore offered a big chunk of money ($10,000?) to anyone able to demonstrate a factual error in his "F911." Since no one has claimed it yet, Mesh should seize the opportunity to put up or shut up.

 

06.27.2007 at 07:25 Reply
re. the previous comment. Mr. Mesh refers to Mr Moore as " a fake populist and an authentic liar". "Fake populist" is a matter of personal opinion but "authentic liar" requires examples and proof.

I have read these charges about Mr. Moore repeatedly and never seen them backed up.

I would hope that Mr. Mesh will either provide both, or acknowledge that his review lacks validity.

 

06.29.2007 at 07:23 Reply
I would be very grateful to know what lies MR. Moore has told, it is certainly propaganda of the worst kind to lob accusations at a filmmaker with no facts to back you up at all.

Just the kind of trash I have come to expect from pro capitalist-yuppie rag selling overpriced WOO to the vichie liberal masses.

 

06.29.2007 at 11:11 Reply
While I've always suspected Mr. Moore's financial offer to be another piece of his public theater, I'm going to assume you three gents are asking for evidence of lies in good faith. I have an answer, though I don't think you're going to like it.

If you're looking for a breakdown of blatant mistruths in Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11," you can't do better than reading the classic Christopher Hitchens debunking from Slate in 2004: slate.com/id/2102723/. A number of open deceptions are noted throughout the piece (most egregious being the claim that Saddam Hussein had never threatened an American) but what's important here is Hitchens' overarching indictment, which I'm happy to salute as the initial spark of my "Moore-hating":

"So I know, thanks, before you tell me, that a documentary must have a 'POV' or point of view and that it must also impose a narrative line. But if you leave out absolutely everything that might give your 'narrative' a problem and throw in any old rubbish that might support it, and you don't even care that one bit of that rubbish flatly contradicts the next bit, and you give no chance to those who might differ, then you have betrayed your craft."

This kind of deception by omission is not simply a weakness of Moore's. It is the basis of his cinematic career. And while he takes pains in "Sicko" to make a fresh start as a unifying, mild figure, he finds the effort impossible because he can't help the pandering he's used to.

Which, in a roundabout way, brings me back to what I said in my original review. If a filmmaker goes to Cuba, documents free medical treatment for Americans, and does not go on to mention that the country has in the past six years suffered a shortage of doctors because its government is shipping them to Hugo Chavez's Venezuela, if the filmmaker does not show any actual Cubans getting health care, or even ask to what degree the doctors helping him are engaged in an international public relations exercise, then that filmmaker is lying to you.

Can I have my $10,000 now?

 

06.29.2007 at 04:01 Reply
You call that refuting facts? That is just wishy washy rumours. I believe Cuba has better health care than we do. I believe that is the only point that Moore is trying to make. You have failed miserably at convincing me otherwise. And I think you should read teh above posts by my fellow readers more closely, and pay them a little more respect by simply shutting the fuck up. Just because you can put a pretty sentence together doesn't mean that you are worth reading. Get a job in manual labor, please.

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close