Monday, February 13

See That Wieden+Kennedy Super Bowl Ad With Clint Eastwood? It Was Directed by David Gordon Green

Plus it was written by Lents poet Matthew Dickman

Movies & Television Another Super Bowl, another PR coup for Wieden+Kennedy. By overwhelming consensus, the ad agency's "... More

Feb 6, 2012 12:35 pm by Aaron Mesh  | Comments 6
 

The Dream of the 1890s is Alive in Portland

Movies & Television We don't make a habit of posting Portlandia clips, but if you don't find this funny, you have no sou... More

Feb 2, 2012 12:33 pm by Ruth Brown  | Comments 10
 

Before You Watch The Grey, Watch These Three Movies

Movies & Television With its bloody Liam Neeson-on-wolf action, blockbuster The Grey, which opens in cinemas today, is g... More

Jan 27, 2012 02:10 pm by WW Arts & Culture Staff  | Comments 1
 

Movies the Oscars Loved That We Hated

(And a few we didn't)

Movies & Television Ho hum, the 2012 Academy Award nominations are out for another year. What did we think? Here's a qui... More

Jan 25, 2012 02:44 pm by Ruth Brown  | Comments 3
 
 
 
Home · Articles · Movies · Movie Reviews & Stories · Lust, Caution
October 3rd, 2007 AARON MESH | Movie Reviews & Stories
 

Lust, Caution

5 Comments
     
Tags:
To answer the most pressing question about Ang Lee’s Lust, Caution : Yes, there is certainly enough graphic sex in it to earn an NC-17 rating, but it’s not the sort of sex that happy people will enjoy watching. The characters played by Tang Wei and Tony Leung have violent sex. Then they have acrobatic sex. This is followed by mournful sex. All of it is very solemn sex. The orgasms look like death throes, and whatever lust is on hand resembles a miserable imperative more than anything like eagerness. There are, to be sure, some impressive displays of flexibility, which inspired in me two thoughts. The first was, I didn’t know you could do that. The second was, I can’t imagine why you’d want to.

Lee’s movie has started going wrong well before Leung sticks his crouching tiger into Wei’s hidden dragon. The 158-minute World War II espionage story has a promising opening hour as Wang Chia Chi, a college student played by Wei, is drawn into a Chinese resistance movement bent on assassinating Mr. Yee (Leung), a Japanese flunky with a weakness for adultery. The conspiracy builds to an unhappy but logical result: Wang loses her virginity, and everybody else loses their innocence. Cut to three years later, when Mr. Yee has risen to the top of the secret police, Wang has been moping purposelessly, and neither of the protagonists seems nearly as sympathetic as he or she did half an hour ago. Mr. Yee has transformed from a roué to a sadist, while Wang has degenerated from an idealist to a sex object in bright red lipstick. On the other hand, they are both a lot more willing to get naked. It’s not the most promising trade-off.

A funny thing about Ang Lee: Though he was born in Taiwan and is clearly fascinated by Asian tradition, it’s only in America that his movies have a pulse. The Ice Storm is perhaps the best literary adaptation of the ’90s, The Hulk has an undeniable zest for comic books (if not quite the feel for them), and Brokeback Mountain is a flawless tear-jerker. Nobody is going to cry over Lust, Caution —except maybe people who get all misty when they read the Kama Sutra. The movie bears a familial resemblance to the spy movies of the 1940s—it owes a special debt to Alfred Hitchcock’s Notorious —but while it shares the style, and Wei looks sumptuous in a black fedora, it’s ultimately drained of all delight. It’s sonorous and dull in the same way as Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon : It takes disreputable, pulpy pleasures and beats them to death with decorum. Neither lover in Lust, Caution asks, “Was it good for you?”—because they both already know the answer. NC-17.

 


SEE IT: Lust, Caution opens Friday at Fox Tower.
 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
10.04.2007 at 05:26 Reply
Did anyone even do some basic research on Ang Lee before letting this review go to press? The sentence, "A funny thing about Ang Lee: Though he was born in Taiwan and is clearly fascinated by Asian tradition, it's only in America that his movies have a pulse" is based on all sorts of offensive assumptions. Lee lived in Taiwan until he was 25. "Fascination" suggests that he was removed from Chinese tradition and only views it from an orientalist perspective. That sentence also suggests that he is still very much a foreigner to U.S. tradition and that's why it's "funny" that someone like him can produce films that capture U.S. life and culture. He's been here over 25 years. When is he going to considered American?

And what is meant by "it's only in America that his movies have a pulse." Do you mean films SET in America or films that are SCREENED in America? His early films, such as Pushing Hands, The Wedding Banquet and Eat Drink Man woman were huge critical and box office hits in Taiwan and abroad, and they were nominated for many Taiwanese as well as international film awards. Obviously these films have had a important critical life outside of America as well as within the U.S. And if the sentence refers to films set in America, then I think that that is a rather ethnocentric claim that highlights the parochial interests of the reviewer.

How about a little research, clarity and nuance, please?

 

10.05.2007 at 11:26 Reply
It is rather silly to think that an aesthetic opinion is somehow completely removed from the cultural context that produces it. You're supposed to be a FILM REVIEWER, who should know film history and, hopefully some film theory. If you're to be film reviewer with credibility, and whose opinion readers are to respect (even if we don't agree with it), then a defensive tautology such as "I like what is good" doesn't really cut it. If this is your position, then anyone can do your job.

Also, you have misread me. I DIDN'T think he had a limited understanding of American culture. I was merely pointing out that you used this phrase "it's a funny thing" which implies that you think it is noteworthy to point out his "understanding" American culture. I'm just questioning why you feel the need to point it out as "funny."

 

10.06.2007 at 10:46 Reply
Heck, I'll give you ammunition. Andrew Sarris has written a spirited defense of the film:

http://www.observer.com/2007/mood-lust-ang-lee-s-steamy-war-picture-most-honest-political-flick-years

I don't agree, for reasons stated above, but it's worth considering. Care to chime in?

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close