Monday, February 13

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 3
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 1
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 2
 

Almost Live: Rockets at Blazers

News So I'm having a bit of trouble with the picture, which is coming from my phone (I drew it on my way ... More

Feb 8, 2012 07:09 pm by CASEY JARMAN  | Comments 0
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · News · For Whom The Bridge Tolls
November 21st, 2007 JAMES PITKIN | News
 

For Whom The Bridge Tolls

How much might you pay to cross the Willamette River? Ask Ted Wheeler.

19 Comments
     
Tags:
TROLL HOUSE: Multnomah County Chairman Ted Wheeler says tolls may be needed to maintain Portland’s bridges.
IMAGE: lukas ketner

Multnomah County Chairman Ted Wheeler told WW recently he was certain drivers will someday pay a toll to cross Willamette River bridges.

Six days later, in a follow-up interview, Wheeler backtracked. “I probably have to tamp my enthusiasm,” he said. “Just raising the idea of tolls on bridges is near-heresy.”

Not in San Francisco, New York City or even Cascade Locks, where drivers have paid tolls for decades. But here in Portland—a city that hasn’t paid a bridge toll since 1895—free rides across the river are seen as a divine right.

As Wheeler’s see-sawing makes clear, tolling on the Willamette—if it’s ever done—is probably a long way off. But with a hefty backlog of unfinished bridge repairs and Wheeler preparing some sort of transportation-funding proposal for the May ballot, local attitudes on tolls may need adjusting if the county wants to avoid a Minnesota-style meltdown.

“We need to start talking about how we are going to fund these bridges—not just today, but 50 years from now,” Wheeler says.

He’s in a position to know. The county has an estimated $600 million in work that needs doing on the six Willamette River bridges it maintains. That includes the decrepit Sellwood Bridge, which scores 2 out of 100 points on a federal bridge sufficiency scale.

The other county-maintained spans are the Broadway, Burnside, Hawthorne, Morrison and Sauvie Island bridges. (The state maintains all the other Willamette bridges except the Steel Bridge, which is run by Union Pacific Railroad.)

Yet in Portland, tolling is met with a skeptical eye. In a 2006 survey on funding done by Davis, Hibbitts&Midghall, Inc. for a new I-5 interstate bridge, 36 percent of 400 likely voters in the tri-county area and Clark County were strongly opposed to tolling. Just 16 percent were strongly in favor.

“The possibility of tolls on Willamette River bridges is slim to none,” says Tom Miller, chief of staff to City Commissioner Sam Adams. “I just don’t think that there is the political appetite for that. I certainly could be wrong. But I don’t think I am.”

Adams has appeared with Wheeler in a series of town-hall meetings to persuade voters of the need for more street funding. Wheeler spokesman Rhys Scholes says the two faced questions from residents both for and against bridge tolling.

“It’s one of those issues where the public is quite divided,” Scholes says.

Yet the need for more transportation funding remains. Five insiders say Adams’ plan for a city gas-tax hike for transportation maintenance has been spiked at the request of Gov. Ted Kulongoski (as first reported on WWire). But the county is forging ahead with plans to put a vehicle-registration fee hike (amount undetermined) on the May 2008 ballot.

A chunk of that new money would go to bridges, but Wheeler says more is needed—and tolls “should be on the table.” The idea has support from John Charles, president of the libertarian-tinged Cascade Policy Institute—especially if it includes congestion pricing at peak hours. “It’s a big twofer,” Charles says. “Not only do you pay for [bridge] rehabilitation, but you make the whole traffic situation flow much more smoothly.”

If tolling ever happens, the Legislature would have to rewrite state law to give the county—or a new Willamette Bridge Authority—the power to collect. Some observers, including County Commissioner Jeff Cogen, doubt the Leg would cede that authority.

Under a toll regime, Wheeler says most—or all—of the city’s bridges would have to collect. Otherwise, drivers would simply veer for the nearest free crossing. Wheeler says he’s not sure how much drivers would pay, but the fee would probably increase during peak hours or be free during off-peak times.

Electronic tolling makes it possible to collect without slowing traffic or making drivers toss coins in a basket, Wheeler says. In Toronto, Charles says, local residents have a card attached to their car that gets scanned. Out-of-towners have their license plates photographed and get billed by mail.

Yet Cogen remains skeptical—especially if voters are asked to pay more for their vehicle registration. “I don’t think tolls on the Willamette River bridges are going to be an easy sell,” he says, “nor a particularly good idea.”

Certainly, local history works against the plan. When the Morrison Bridge—the first across the Willamette—opened in 1887, there were tolls of 5 cents for pedestrians and 20 cents for two-horse wagons, according to Jewel Lansing’s Portland: People, Politics and Power 1850-2001 .

When the cities of Portland, East Portland and Albina merged in 1891, civic leaders sold the plan with a promise to make the bridges free. The city then bought the Morrison and Madison bridges and tossed out the tolls. Free bridges became a fixture of city life ever since.

Lansing says it would be difficult to go back now. “I don’t think it would go over well with Portlanders, particularly because that was part of the reason for merging these cities 120 years ago,” she says. “I doubt it would happen.”


SELECTED TOLLS ELSEWHERE
Golden Gate Bridge (San Francisco): $5
Verrazano-Narrows Bridge (New York): $9
Bridge of the Gods (Cascade Locks): $1
 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
11.21.2007 at 09:10 Reply
Jim
"Out-of-towners have their license plates photographed and get billed by mail.'

Oh yeah, that will go over well. Good job Portland. Make PDX even more unfriendly!

Maybe we should fund important things first, like bridges, and not trams, esplanades, street cars, etc.

I expected more from you Mr. Wheeler. And I don't mean MORE TAXES.

 

11.21.2007 at 10:39 Reply
Yeah, I'm about to self-tax myself and build a bridge from my fist to Wheeler's face. The only toll around here is coming from a bell and Mr. Wheeler is for whom it be chimin like a mother-fucker. Hugo Wheeler Chavez better start baking some toll-house cookies, to sell at the local community bake-n-shake and I DO MEAN DOUBLE CHOCOLATE!

 

11.21.2007 at 10:53 Reply
z
Jim -

The City built the tram, the esplanade and the street cars. City money does not = County money. If you have a problem with the way the City spends its money, let the City know but don't blame the County for City expenditures.

 

11.21.2007 at 10:57 Reply
In New York and in San Francisco tolls make sense. The river and bay that separate those cities separate much more than 2 sides of town that the Willamette separates. The river happens to be in the center of Portland, but to separate the sides of the city would do no good except make traffic a bigger problem than it already is.

 

11.21.2007 at 06:26 Reply
Since this article has provoked at least one threat of violence, I think I should point out that I have not suggested tolling as a short-term solution. I made it very clear to the reporter that a) the county does not have tolling authority, B) tolling does not make sense given that the county does not control all of the crossings in the area, and C) tolling lacks political support (including on recent polls done for the City of Portland). I raised other potential objections, as well. For whatever reason, the objections I raised were not included in the article. I will stand by my belief that tolling should be on the table as one of several possible LONG-TERM options, but only if the three above objections are addressed. Tolling is used as an ALTERNATIVE to other taxes to pay for transportation infrastructure in other parts of the country. All of the bridges mentioned with tolls are in excellent condition. Tolling may not be for us now or ever, but then again, we let a bridge (Sellwood) age to the point where it has a federal adequacy rating of only a 2 on a scale of 1 to 100.

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close