Sunday, February 12

Win Free Cart Food For a Year

PDX Cartathalon II

Food & Drink Put your eating pants on, Portland: Willamette Week's now annual Cartathalon is back! The Cartathalo... More

Feb 1, 2012 01:30 pm by Ruth Brown  | Comments 0
 

BagelGate: Kettleman to Become Einstein Bros.; Portlanders Hit Back

Food & Drink News that Portland's Kettleman Bagels had been sold to the vastly inferior national chain Noah's Bag... More

Jan 31, 2012 12:45 pm by Ruth Brown  | Comments 10
 

Hair of the Dog Heads to Belgium

...and other Oregon beer news

Food & Drink For the last five years, much-decorated Belgian brewmaster Dirk Naudts, who develops beer recipes fo... More

Jan 30, 2012 02:50 pm by Brian Yaeger  | Comments 1
 

Portland, These Are Your Coffee Champions

PDX sweeps North West Regional Barista Competition

Food & Drink Competitive coffee making: yes, it exists, and it's serious business. There's music and costumes and... More

Jan 29, 2012 08:50 am by Ruth Brown  | Comments 0
 

Restaurant Cheap Eats Drink Devour
 
 
Home · Articles · Food & Drink · Food Reviews & Stories · Reign of Terroir
November 28th, 2007 Heidi Yorkshire | Food Reviews & Stories
 

Reign of Terroir

A new small plates bistro in Northeast Portland gets points for good intentions, but its flavors don’t measure up.

8 Comments
     
Tags:
KITCHEN AID: Above: Terroir chef-owner Stu Stein sauces his braised lamb shank.
IMAGE: dlreamer.com

Any honest chef will tell you that some of his best ideas were purloined from other people’s restaurants. A truly original dish is damn rare, and almost all restaurants these days are variations on one formula or another, or hybrids of several. Of course, the good chef will take a good idea and find a way to improve on it or make it into a creation of his own. As Pablo Picasso supposedly said, “Bad artists copy. Great artists steal.”

Terroir, which opened in June in Northeast Portland, is named for the hard-to-translate French word that signifies a sense of place in food and wine, the combination of soil and season that makes a taste unique. For this new venture, owner-chef Stu Stein (who spent several years at the Peerless Restaurant in Ashland and wrote a cookbook, The Sustainable Kitchen ) took a heaping helping of the local-seasonal-sustainable ethos and mixed it with the trendy small-plates format for what the menu calls “a taste of the Pacific Northwest.”

Nothing wrong with those concepts—nobody takes a restaurant seriously around here if farmers aren’t traipsing through the dining room with muddy flats of carrots, and “small plates” used to be called “the bar menu.” But compared with fellow Northeast Portland hot spots Toro Bravo and Lolo, both of which have a small-plates focus, the cooking at Terroir is uneven and curiously timid, and the menu feels like a pastiche of good and not-so-good ideas. While you’ll certainly find some tasty bites, it’s tough to put together a meal that pleases from beginning to end.

Perhaps due to its location (the building, at the corner of Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard and Northeast Fremont Street, is a poster child for the Portland Development Commission’s MLK renewal project), the restaurant touts “affordable” prices. Still, don’t expect bargains: Though most dishes cost between $5 and $12, they’re just a few bites. On a recent visit with a girlfriend, an adequate but hardly gut-busting meal (with two of the less expensive glasses of wine) ran $85 with tip.

Although the layout of Terroir is awkwardly long and narrow at first glance, a snazzy “wine wall” and theatrically lit kitchen with a handsome stone oven pull the space together. The hostess handles the door cordially and promptly. Earnest servers in smart thyme-green pullovers welcome questions about dishes or ingredients, and are happy to trot back to the kitchen for answers.

Some of the most consistent dishes have been long-cooked meats from the wood oven, like savory “12-hour” veal cheeks (with delicious Juniper Grove goat cheese mac-’n’-cheese, $12) and braised lamb shank ($12). Roasted beef marrow bones with herb salad and toasted brioche ($7) are credited to London chef Fergus Henderson, who has made the dish a signature. I happen to love marrow and never get enough, so this dish thrilled me—except for the time when the bones arrived at the table bloody, a real appetite-killer.

Simple vegetable sides like roasted green beans with shallots ($4), a sauté of wild mushrooms ($7) and roasted fingerling potatoes with smoked sea salt ($5) have been simply fine. Soups, including an “heirloom” tomato broth with gazpacho vegetables and a poached oyster ($6), have been strong as well, though an otherwise sweet, earthy celery-root purée was ruined by a insistent backnote of hot pepper ($6).

High-end presentations—squirted oils, architecturally stacked components—seem inappropriately fussy for the rustic, ingredient-driven style of the menu. And good ingredients don’t necessarily add up to good food without a sure hand to balance essential components like salt, acidity, sweetness and spiciness, any of which can be off kilter here, and in different ways on different nights. For many of the dishes, flavors were so mild I had to check the menu to find out what they were meant to taste like. Take risotto with “caramelized cauliflower, horseradish, vanilla and almonds”: the cauliflower never showed a hint of brown, the horseradish and vanilla were undetectable (probably a blessing in disguise), and the almonds made the whole thing smack of breakfast cereal (small portion $5/large $9).

For a restaurant that features seasonality, it’s surprising how many dishes on the menu back in mid-August were just tweaked a bit for early November. In summer, for example, the pasta was black-pepper pappardelle with braised lamb shoulder ragù and “wine-soaked” apricots ($7/$12)—not that the black pepper could be tasted in the too-thick noodles, or that nubbins of apricot added much to the dish. In autumn, the pasta became black-pepper fettuccine with braised fallow deer venison, wild mushrooms and leeks ($8/$14). Rockfish “crudo” ($8) in summer came with the too-creative combination of lemon-rosemary oil and tomato-watermelon salsa. (One or the other would have sufficed.) In autumn it became rockfish ceviche ($8), with a bashful citrus vinaigrette and radish and sunchoke salad.

Several aspects of Terroir live up to its aspirations, especially the selection of regional artisan cheeses and the smartly curated, all-Northwest wine list, brimming with original and unexpected choices. Served in first-class stemware, the wines are fairly priced, and you can always find a couple of sophisticated flights, like a summer offering of rosés made with tempranillo, pinot noir and syrah.

On paper, Terroir is a surefire combination of proven concepts, something you can take to the bank. On the plate, however, the flavors don’t pay off. Stein has borrowed ideas from some of the best restaurants around the country, but he hasn’t been bold enough to steal them and make them his own.


EAT: Terroir, 3500 NE Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., 288-3715, terroirportland.com. Dinner 5-10 pm Tuesday-Thursday, 5-11 pm Friday-Saturday, 5-9 pm Sunday. $$ Moderate.

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
11.28.2007 at 12:48 Reply
Heidi -

Just had a chance to review your latest review, "Reign of Terroir" in WW's Dish Culture (11/28/07). Not knowing much about you, I came to learn (through a Google search including the conversation piece in April with Nancy Rommelman) that your experience is much like that of a physician's assistant or legal secretary as compared with that of a doctor or attorney - you're a writer, not an owner/chef, by training. Not all experience, or it's length, makes one qualified. In the twenty one articles I could locate on the WW website, nearly half of the "reviews" were, um, critical. You were quoted as saying that you'd like to "help the restaurant out" with positive reviews and that you may not write a review depending upon the financial situation of the operation. That's not consumer journalism - it's selective at best. At it's worst, it's doesn't pass the stink test. I am glad, however, that you refuse to write reviews about those restaurants you have personal relationships with - very commendable. My wife and I have been to Terroir a half dozen times since it opened earlier this year. We've recommended it to relatives, friends and neighbors. We even hosted a dinner there in July in association with the Wine and Food Society of Oregon. We've enjoyed it so much so that my wine group, Willamette Wine Tasters, will be holding it holiday dinner at Terroir next month. My sense is that your review would have been different had you come to the Bordeaux dinner in July or if you could make our holiday dinner. I've not once been disappointed with the food or the pricing. In fact, I'd suggest that their pricing is below market. I'd be happy to send you the menu for the Bordeaux dinner and would do the same for the upcoming event - in fact, I'd invite you and your husband to join us as my guests. Stu and his wife, Mary, have worked very hard, long hours and devoted nearly everything they have into this venture - I'm surprised you didn't give them the same chance as the "mom and pop" venture mentioned in the conversation piece. It sounds like you gave love a second chance - Terroir deserves the same.

Regards

 

11.28.2007 at 02:56 Reply
With all due respect, Greg, I don't think that attending a restaurant as the invited guest of a wine group that is renting the place out is going to give anyone a sense of what the average consumer is going to encounter when he or she wanders into the restaurant on any night of the week.

As that "average consumer," I want reviewers to write from the perspective of the average person-off-the-street. Yeah, great, an industry group is going to get special service and perhaps a specially tailored menu--that's the whole point, no? But writing a review from that perspective would give readers the mistaken impression that this constitutes the standard experience at the restaurant, when in fact Heidi's review above seems to capture that more accurately.

 

11.29.2007 at 04:47 Reply
I beg the question in turn then Dave, have you eaten there yet? I have at least half a dozen times and I have yet to be disappointed. Also, Greg's challenge does not sully his point that Heidi tends less to be what she trumpets; an altruistic journalist/herald of restaurants that deserve note, but rather a salacious critic dependent on mud-raking to keep herself in circulation.

 

11.29.2007 at 01:03 Reply
The longer the indignant post, the closer the reviewer has hit to home.

 

12.01.2007 at 01:47 Reply
I also appreciate Heidi Yorkshire's full reviews, infrequent as they are. As for not being a chef/owner, that's a plus for her potential objectivity. It is bothersome if she really has said she'd give a place a good review (or no review) if she felt they needed help to survive. I hope Greg's reference to that was taken out of context (which seems likely, given his tone). And the fact that Steven has yet to be disappointed at Terroir says more about his expectations than the actual experience. At their level of price and pretension, places such as Terroir should be darned near perfect, yet many Portland foodies seem to be content if the meal is simply better, or even just more complex, than what they could concoct at home.

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close