PUT THIS IN YOUR PIPE AND SMOKE IT
Your article last week [“King Bong,”
WW , Dec. 12] troubles me enough to write my first LTE to you after almost 20 years of faithfully reading WWeek. I have known Mr. Stanford for over 15 years. I have been his business partner, co-chief petitioner for two political initiatives and his landlord. During this lengthy relationship I have found Mr. Stanford to be honest, forthcoming, professional and very generous.
If WWeek would have conducted a fair interview they could have found hundreds of people who would have spoken about Mr. Stanford’s many good qualities. Instead the article turned out to be an obvious smear campaign against him. Thank god that sometimes even bad publicity is good publicity.
Your article also talks about Kevin Mannix and his ill-intentioned initiative, which would replace the wildly successful Oregon Medical Marijuana Program with a taxpayer-funded program that would provide pharmaceutical, synthetic, markedly ineffective pills to medical marijuana patients instead of the natural, highly effective, inexpensive medicine they now enjoy. Everyone knows Mannix has an agenda and the fact that he is funded by self-proclaimed “sex therapist” Loren Parks is laughable. I mean c’mon, who is this guy kidding?
It would be nice if WWeek would take this important issue seriously. Medical cannabis, hemp and marijuana are all gifts from the greatest plant on the planet. Let’s see some positive stories about this issue for a change.
Chris Iverson
Ashland, Ore.
LOOK AGAIN
I am writing in response to Nigel Jaquiss’ article [“Balance of Power,”
WW , Dec. 12].
First, when an inquiry regarding prevailing wage rate (PWR) is made, we rely on information provided to us by the business making the request. If 20 percent or less of the work is physical in nature, the work is not subject to PWR laws. Based on the 2003 characterization of the work provided by ABA, our agency provided an appropriate response.
When two former employees filed wage claims, we completed a thorough investigation. It became clear that testing and balancing is not limited to yellow pad and pen work but involves work that is physical in nature including: drilling, hauling equipment and replacing motor carriages. Had Penson more fully described the nature of the work back in 2003, BOLI’s response would have been different.
In October Penson was fined $34,283 by Washington state for failing to pay prevailing wages to workers performing THE SAME duties as those in question here. Washington is one of the many states that already defines testing and balancing as subject to PWR laws.
I’d like to suggest a re-framing of this issue. Penson has been characterized as a small-business owner subject to arbitrary and overly harsh treatment by state government. BOLI’s mission is to protect employee rights and to advance employment opportunities in Oregon. It is in fulfillment of this mission that when wage claims were filed we conducted an investigation and we concluded that employees had not been properly classified and were therefore owed wages. The ONLY thing Penson is a victim of is his own decision to mischaracterize the nature of the work, not of arbitrary or overreaching state government.
Dan Gardner
Commissioner, Bureau of Labor&Industries
Ed. note: For more, see Murmurs.
CAVEAT EMPTOR
[Re: “Kitchen Bitchin’,”
WW , Dec. 12, 2007]: I can’t say that I have a lot of sympathy for people who choose not to educate themselves about the cost of student loan re-payment or the realities of finding a good-paying job in their chosen field. Student-loan repayment calculators estimate that a person with $40,000 in loans will need an annual salary of at least $55,000 a year to be able to repay this amount.
This town is full of disgruntled WCI graduates because they have been making these promises for years. When I moved to Portland in 1993, they were telling students how they had placed graduates with the “renowned” Wolfgang Puck. I have no doubt their tactics are akin to those of used-car salesmen, but I cannot fathom how $40k for a 14-month program sounds reasonable. A WCI diploma isn’t worth the paper it’s printed on.
JH
Via wweek.com
.nar.jpg)
Criticism sucks, especially when its valid.
When will you folks offer up something worthwhile about cannabis anyway (instead of your usual pap)? Hell, I'll write it if you can't... and so far it seems you can't (or don't wanna)...
Here's the one I wrote (complete with references) that they didn't print:
Dear Editor,
Paul Stanford is propagating misinformation. Hemp is not Marijuana. “The Hemp and Cannabis Foundation” and “Hempstalk” are misnomers. You can’t get high from eating hempseed granola which contains less than one percent THC, (as opposed to Marijuana’s 20 percent) and hempseed is dehulled reducing the levels of residual THC to trace amounts.
The entire controversy was launched in the 1930’s when the DuPont company courted William Randolph Hearst, the newspaper giant who was investing heavily in the timber industry that provided the wood pulp for newsprint. Since hemp was cheaper than wood pulp and its superior strength made it a competitor for nylon which was DuPont’s synthetic product, the two conspired to destroy the hemp industry. They lobbyed the Treasury Department and started a newspaper campaign lumping hemp cultivation together with horror stories of pot smoking.
They quickly won Harry J. Anslinger over, the first commissioner of the newly hatched Federal Bureau of Narcotics, who immediately assigned his 300 FBI agents to lobby state legislators to ratify the Uniform Drug Act which criminalized all forms of cannabis and was passed by the National Council of Commissioners in 1932. Anslinger was nephew-in-law to Treasury Secretary and banker Andrew Mellon. Mellon also financed DuPont and had actually designed Anslinger’s position. In 1937 President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Marijuana Act. The corporate moguls won, the environment lost.
Sincerely,
Lisa C. Gorlin
Why Howard and Mary like Hillary
1.She is not pretentious, She acts her age with wisdom and intelligence.
2. Hillary has been around and closely involved with pretentious individuals
who have
done her and the Country wrong. She now separates who are for the good
of
themselves and not for the good of the Country.
Hillary knows who are well experienced, tried and trusted co-workers,to
appoint for
her cabinet and other places.
3. Hillary has demonstrated a passion for childhood health, welfare and
education that
others only talk about.
4. Hillary has written a book titled