Tuesday, February 14

Sam Adams is on Yelp

News The other day I noticed a curious tweet from our venerable mayor's Twitter account:Yes, Sam is tweet... More

Feb 13, 2012 01:20 pm by RUTH BROWN  | Comments 1
 

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 4
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 1
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 4
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · News · Been There, Done That
December 26th, 2007 Stephen Marc Beaudoin | News
 

Been There, Done That

New state domestic partnership law starts Jan. 2. Good? Yes. Exciting? Well…

2 Comments
     
Tags:
Third Time’s A Charm: Mike Pickrell and Steve Isaacson will soon get their longtime relationship recognized by Oregon—finally.
IMAGE: leahnash.com

Mike and Steve have been through this before.

In 2004, they rushed to Multnomah County offices to get a marriage license after county officials began granting same-sex marriages.

There, the couple of eight years—hands shaking with excitement and cheered on by bouquet-bearing friends—eagerly paid $60 to fill out their long-awaited marriage license.

This year, they returned to that same office to register with Multnomah County as “domestic partners,” again for $60. The new designation didn’t restore any of the rights they lost when Oregon voters passed Measure 36 in 2004, banning gay marriage in the state. But the ability to register their arrangement with the county enabled Mike Pickrell, 55, to get on 59-year-old partner Steve Isaacson’s health insurance plan at Portland State University. (Isaacson is associate dean of PSU’s Graduate School of Education.)

The county mailed back their marriage registration check in 2004 once Measure 36 effectively annulled their marriage. But the two still have their vows, their matching star sapphire rings, and their marriage certificate from 2004.

And so when the Oregon Family Fairness Act (House Bill 2007) takes effect Jan. 2, 2008, Mike and Steve will trudge to that same office a third time, pay that same $60 fee, and register themselves yet again as a committed couple: this time as state-sanctioned “domestic partners.” That will enable them to make healthcare decisions for each other, file joint state tax returns at a substantial annual savings, and enjoy more than 500 other rights and responsibilities.

“Here we go again at another angle,” Pickrell says with a good-natured laugh. “We never used to think of marriage even as a possibility.” Isaacson adds: “I already feel like we’re the most boring married couple.”

After riding the political and emotional roller coaster that’s been the gay partnership rights movement for the past few years, it’s not surprising that many gay couples in Oregon might be feeling marriage fatigue.

And even as Oregon prepares to begin granting same-sex domestic partnerships Jan. 2, with Basic Rights Oregon-sponsored parties across the state, many gays are weary of celebrating another “partnerships victory” too soon.

“I don’t sense a lot of excitement about the new law,” says Jimmy Parchment, 27.

Parchment and Alan Leggett, 30, met in 2003 on the dance floor of Southeast lesbian dive the Egyptian Room. “And we’ve been inseparable ever since,” Parchment says.

During that time, Parchment volunteered for Basic Rights Oregon, helping to raise money for BRO and rallying his peers against Measure 36.

Though he and Leggett do plan to register as domestic partners ASAP, Parchment says he feels a “sense of apathy” about the new law among he and his peers.

Basic Rights Oregon spokeswoman Karynn Fish calls the new domestic partnership law a landmark civil-rights step but concedes it’s not nearly as hyped as the 2004 gay marriage stampede in Multnomah County.

In an informal poll conducted on BRO’s website, Fish says, “We heard from about 500 couples around the state saying they plan to get partnered,” on or after Jan. 2.

Fish and BRO are also fending off some 11th-hour legal heat from the Tennessee-based anti-gay activist lawyer David Crowe, who led an unsuccessful petition drive to refer the legislatively passed domestic partnership law to the 2008 ballot.

Crowe has filed suit against the Oregon Secretary of State’s Office to block the domestic partnership law. Crowe’s motion claims that signatories to Crowe’s anti-HB 2007 petition will suffer “substantial and irreparable harm” if the law is put into effect Jan. 2. A federal judge will hear the case Dec. 28.

For Leggett and Parchment, the new domestic partnership law is most important because the couple wants to be able to take care of each other in emergencies and old age. The couple also want to adopt kids (“between two and three,” Parchment says, “so I’ll say two and a half”) and plan for the future. And Parchment would like to put the marriage-unions-partnerships conversation on the shelf.

“I don’t think this is a conversation we’ll be having 20 or 30 years from now,” he says. “I think small steps are important. And we’ve won for now.”


FACT: Multnomah County expects as many as several thousand couples to register as domestic partners in the coming year. For more information about registering here or in any county in Oregon, go to basicrights.org.
 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
12.26.2007 at 08:46 Reply
Though I'm all for gay marriage, the jury is still out on the Oregon Family Fairness Act.

Most small group health insurance carriers already allow domestic partners to enroll by simply signing an affidavit. This means in many cases straight and gay couples alike are able to add their partners at will, something married couples cannot do without a "qualifying event". The potential for abuse is clear: healthy domestic partners may opt out of group coverage while those who are already ailing can sign up anytime they wish as the affidavit requiring the couple to have lived together for 6 or 12 months cannot be verified.

The more adverse risk we put into the pool the higher rates climb for all. By allowing more and more people to insure their proverbial burning house we're punishing healthy enrollees who thought ahead and already paid premiums to insure future risk.

How will the OFFA affect this dynamic? Will it remedy the situation by doing away with domestic partner affidavits and requiring legal documentation of partnership (creating a qualifying event)? Or will it exasperate the current problem by taking discretion away from the marketplace and requiring carriers to insure more "burning houses".

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close