Sunday, February 12

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 2
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 1
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 1
 

Almost Live: Rockets at Blazers

News So I'm having a bit of trouble with the picture, which is coming from my phone (I drew it on my way ... More

Feb 8, 2012 07:09 pm by CASEY JARMAN  | Comments 0
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · News · Trans-formational Politics
January 23rd, 2008 Lillian Hogan | News
 

Trans-formational Politics

He, she…Who cares?

6 Comments
     
Tags:
Fresh Faces: Laura Calvo, a transgender woman (left) who was recently chosen as treasurer of the Multnomah County Democratic Party. From left to right: Susan Silodor, vice chair; Carla “KC” Hanson, chair; Travis Miller, recording secretary; and Sue Hagmeier, communications secretary.
IMAGE: Lillian Hogan

Forget for a moment the landmark major presidential campaigns of a woman and a black man. The transgender community is also staking a claim this year in politics from Portland to Minnesota.

Among the new Multnomah County Democratic Party administrative team chosen this month by party members is Laura Calvo, a 51-year-old transgender woman.

The choice of Calvo as a county party’s treasurer may not seem so significant, but the Jan. 10 election was followed last week by transgender male Chrissy Nakonsky announcing he is running as a Republican candidate in the Minnesota House. And any political emergence of the T in the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender—or GLBT—community is significant, Calvo says, because “we’re all neighbors.”

“We went out and talked to our neighbors and community and gathered interest,” Calvo says. “And now we’re seeing that interest paying off in leadership roles.”

The Democratic National Committee approved a rule in 2006 that requires all state party leaders to establish programs to increase the number of GLBT delegates selected for the 2008 national convention. At the 2004 convention in Boston, 282 GLBT delegates were seated—about 6.5 percent of the voting delegates—which was the largest in history at a major party convention. GLBT delegates and advocates hope for at least 321 delegates—or about 7.5 percent—at the Democratic convention this August in Denver. (Separate breakdowns for transgender delegates aren’t available.)

The transgender community’s need for higher political visibility surfaced recently when the Democratic-controlled U.S. House passed the latest version of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act. The bill now under consideration by the Senate would protect gay people in the workplace but not the transgender community.

In 31 states it is legal to fire someone for being gay, lesbian or bisexual, according to the Human Rights Campaign. In 39 states, it is legal to fire someone for being transgender. In Oregon, the Legislature’s passage last year of Senate Bill 2 made employment discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity punishable.

But the bill came too late for Calvo, who retired in 1995 after serving 16 years as a deputy with the Josephine County Sheriff’s Office. She heard through a supervisor that then-Sheriff Dan Calvert called her a “freak” and said she shouldn’t try to return to work after her gender identity was discovered.

Calvo, who moved to Portland in 2004, says her identity as a Democrat trumps her gender identity in her new party role.

Lori Buckwalter, a once-vocal member of the Portland transgender community who recently moved to Washington state, says many politically involved GLBT people face the dilemma: “Do we include openly our gender identity and gender history in our public identities?”

If yes, Buckwalter says it may limit opportunities. If no, there’s the risk of condemnation for concealing some purportedly significant characteristic.

Buckwalter chooses to share her gender identity publicly. And when it comes to the Multnomah County Democratic Party, its leaders speak freely of their sexual orientations but seem more interested in discussing access to health care, adequate shelter, and living wage jobs.

“We don’t put a code next to the names of each officeholder to indicate race, ethnic background, sexual orientation or anything else,” says communication secretary Sue Hagmeier, a former Portland School Board member. “And we haven’t been keeping score.”

In addition to Calvo, the county party chairwoman is Carla “KC” Hanson, who’s a lesbian. Jokes Hanson: “I think I’m probably better known for being a klutz than being gay.”


FACT: The population of transgender people in the United States is hard to pinpoint because many live in secrecy. However, estimates place the number at 1 percent of the national population, which if true in Portland would mean about 5,500 transgender people.

GET INVOLVED: Democrats will hold their 2007-08 Dick Celsi Awards Dinner at the Wonder Ballroom, 128 NE Russell St. 6 pm Saturday, Feb. 2. For more information, visit multdems.org.

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
01.23.2008 at 08:13 Reply
Actually, unlike sexual orientation, transgender status is considered a disability under Oregon's disability law and, unlike the Americans with Disabilities Act, is not excluded from protection. Therefore, regardless of the fate of the recent antidiscrimination bill passed by the legislature last session (which may or may not be referred to the ballot), it will remain illegal to discriminate against transgendered people in employment in Oregon.

However, Oregon employers are not required to "reasonably accommodate" transgendered status--a confusing concept but one which probably means the state is not going to act as the bathroom or locker room monitor for Oregon businesses.

 

01.23.2008 at 02:02 Reply
1% of the population. lol. I'm calling bullshit. And the methodology used was???

 

01.24.2008 at 12:31 Reply
Nice article Lillian. Keep up the good work. I see you have photography covered as well.

 

01.25.2008 at 01:09 Reply
What many like Bill ignore when questioning accurate population estimates about LGBT people is that these statistics estimate all of us, not just the most visible.

People are accustomed to looking at minority population statistics and comparing them against the gender and skin color of people they know. But, sexual orientation and gender identity are invisible traits unless consciously, visibly expressed. And, is it really so surprising that many of us choose carefully who and when to tell?

Most everyone reading this already knows more - maybe far more - LGBT people than they realize.

 

02.02.2008 at 10:03 Reply
Whatever the statistics, and whatever the laws, here are the common facts: People whose gender identity or expression or their preference of such, whether expressed or not, are at risk in this culture, and routinely face losing employment and the ability to obtain the same access to public accommodations (and yes, Jack, even to change in a locker room or relieve oneself in the privacy of a bathroom stall). There is no sense to this exclusion and discrimination, save the reinforcement of prejudice; certainly it does not serve the purported purpose of guarding the public safety.

Speaking of the lack of statistical support, none exists to demonstrate the risk to non-trans people of equal respectful access to jobs and public spaces for all, whereas trans and gender-different people are indeed at risk of personal harm as well as public exclusion.

One other thing about the disingenuous mention of supposed inclusion of transgender people under Oregon disability law (Jack?)- it is of no practical use in protecting the people at risk, and applies ONLY to the diagnosis of TRANSSEXUALISM, not to the wider category of transgender identity or appearance.

The most fundamental question to this debate is: what conceivable purpose is served by the maintenance of discrimination, other than the confirmation of gender phobia in the minds of bigots? Heaven forbid we should be "reasonable" in our treatment of each other as human beings... what kind of a world would universal human dignity produce, after all?

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close