Union tally: At a Jan. 28 union rally in Portland, U.S. Senate candidate Jeff Merkley (in the background holding the “Support PPS Custodians & Food Service Workers” sign) listens to SEIU president Andy Stern (foreground). IMAGE: chrisryanphoto.com |
Unionized teachers in Portland have questions for Jeff Merkley, a candidate in the May Democratic primary for U.S. Senate, after WWire reported on Monday the powerful state lawmaker considered sending his son to a charter school in 2004.
While such an event in a candidate’s role as a parent from four years ago may not seem significant, it deals with one of the most contentious issues facing the statewide teachers union, the Oregon Education Association. Backers of charter schools—independently run, but publicly funded schools that are required to have only 50 percent of their teachers licensed by the state—say the schools don’t traditionally have huge support from the OEA or Oregon Democrats.
What’s more, the news comes just before the 48,000-member union meets March 7 to decide whom it’s endorsing in the May 20 Democratic primary for U.S. Senate. So far Merkley, the House Speaker, has thoroughly trounced activist Steve Novick in winning union endorsements, key assets in a Democratic primary.
And the OEA nod is big because the union represents 2.5 percent of registered voters and can bring large donations to any race.
OEA lobbyist Laurie Wimmer Whelan minimized news about Merkley’s charter school interest, saying teachers can separate Merkley’s public record from his private actions.
But here’s why Merkley’s union dues could become union blues: Some voters, including teachers, consider charter schools to be union-busting endeavors, because charter schools aren’t required to participate in collective bargaining. In 1999, Merkley opposed Senate Bill 100, the state’s charter school law, which included that provision.
Yet in 2004, Merkley and his wife, Mary Sorteberg, submitted paperwork to the Arthur Academy charter school in Southeast Portland on behalf of their then-8-year-old son, according to leading charter-school advocate Rob Kremer who saw the form.
“I was pleasantly surprised…[he] was interested in enrolling his kid in a charter school, given that he had voted against charter schools at every opportunity,” says Kremer.
The Arthur Academy is not unionized.
“It’s not a point in favor in my eyes,” says Doug Winn, an English teacher at Grant High School in Northeast Portland, about Merkley’s interest. “It’s not great.”
Teacher Deborah Krum at Roosevelt High School in North Portland agreed. “It sounds like enough to raise a question,” Krum says.
Merkley campaign spokesman Matt Canter did not deny Merkley and his wife inquired into the charter school for their son. But he said questions about a candidate’s child represent “the worst kind of politics.”
“At some point, Jeff’s wife had heard about the school and, like any parent, they decided to just check it out,” Canter says. “But they never seriously considered sending their son there.”
The OEA says it doesn’t oppose the concept of charter schools. But its actions suggest a different story.
In 1999, the union fought against SB 100, and wanted stricter rules in place to govern charter schools.
The OEA has continued to express reservations about Oregon’s public charter schools. As recently as 2007, the OEA tried with Senate Bill 621 to force charter schools to employ only licensed teachers, a move charter-school advocates watered down, then killed.
Canter defends Merkley and points to his candidate’s education record in Salem.
“Jeff has received a 100 percent rating for the last session from the OEA,” Canter says. “He has met face to face with many members across the state to talk about what he has done to raise funding for public schools, to expand Head Start and what his plans will be to completely overhaul No Child Left Behind and put control in the hands of teachers.”
“And from what we’ve heard from teachers—and we speak to them every single day on this campaign,” Canter says, “those issues will matter a great deal more.”
Teacher Sandra Childs from Franklin High School in Southeast Portland agreed. She says a private decision on behalf of one’s child should be looked at differently than a public record. She didn’t, however, discount Merkley’s decision entirely.
“I might want to ask him why he made that decision,” Childs says. “I might want to first ask him about other things.”
Wimmer Whelan, the OEA lobbyist, says she’s not sure how the OEA’s entire membership will view Merkley’s action in 2004. But she adds, “I think they would look at his entire record, and he’s been a passionate advocate for public education.”
On Feb. 25, School Board members with Portland Public Schools renewed the charter for another Arthur Academy in Portland. But board member Ruth Adkins acknowledged the controversy still swirling in Oregon around charter schools, which have the advantage of paying their non-unionized teachers less money.
“I do continue to question the charter school system, which I consider to be in direct competition with neighborhood schools,” Adkins told the other board members.
FACT: The OEA represents 48,000 professionals, including public-school teachers, counselors, instructional aides and bus drivers.
"At some point, Jeff
This is just another example of Beth Slovic's one-sided agenda against charter schools. Honestly, it's becoming a little lather, rinse, repeat, Beth. I'd love to see you interview some charter school teachers or administrators. Where is there representation, here?
And seriously Ruth Adkins, how many kids in PPS attend Charters? PPS has shot itself in the foot with school closures and open transfers, stop using Charters as a red herring.
Show me one monopoly that has ever benefited the customer! Keep in mind...the other established players in K-12 don't like competition either (OSBA, ODE, COSA, OSEA, the Democratic Party)....
First they interviewed dozens of tenants of buildings Merkley owns to find one or two disgruntled whiners -- unhappy that the rental management company hired by the busy Merkley didn't fix everything immediately to their satisfaction -- and tried to paint Merkley as some uncaring slum lord. Of course, he's been a great advocate for affordable housing in Oregon, and used to lead Habitat for Humanity. Swift Boat #1.
Then WW and Nigel Jacquiss opined that Merkley was awol on mortage reform, and misrepresented Gordon Smith's efforts on the behalf of the private mortgage insurance industry. Merkley has been a strong advocate of helping working class folks get into a house without getting screwed -- he helped create IDAs in Portland. He just passed a mortgage reform bill in Salem by going across the aisle, in the face of heated lobbying by the mortgage industry, and getting three Republican votes. Merkley's been one of the strongest advocates for consumer protection in Salem, taking on the payday lenders last session. Jacquiss tried to paint Gordon Smith as the saint, when in fact Smith's legislation to make private mortgage insurance tax deductible arose at the behest of the insurers themselves, who were losing market share and profits following the increase in 80-20 or 80-10-10 combo loans (any possibility that Gordon Smith's former chief of staff from 1996 to 2002, Kurt Pfotenhauer, who then spent six years as a senior vice president of the Mortgage Bankers Association, influenced that policy?). Swift Boat #2.
And now Rob Kremer and charter schools, and digging into the most personal and difficult decisions parents have to make. Every child is an unique individual, and parents struggle to make the right decision, and place that child in an educational environment that matches their needs. That appears to be all Merkley did. Is Beth Slovic familiar with the unique personality and educational needs of Merkley's own kid? Why do we need to go there? At the same time, without question, Merkley has compiled a stellar record of support for public schools in Oregon.
Take a look at Merkley's personal story (you can find a surprisingly good profile of Merkley in the Portland Tribune, a week ago Tuesday -- funny, a fair profile of Merkley in a paper owned by Robert Pamplin, while WW keeps slamming Merkley...to find out something about Merkley -- which you won't find out in WW -- go to the link http://www.portlandtribune.com/news/story.php?story_id=120337010889789100). You can dismiss his personal bio if your jaded and cynical -- but how about a reality check. He came from a working class family in southern Oregon, then attended David Douglas High in Portland when his family moved here (after work dried up in southern Oregon). His father didn't go to college. Merkley is where he is because of the educational opportunities afforded to him -- and it appears, thankfully, that he hasn't forgotten that, and does all he can to make those same opportunities available to any child in Oregon. Swift Boat #3.
Didn't this same paper give Steve Novick a full-on cover feature, with pages and pages inside in Novick's own words -- a free platform to announce his candidacy? I think it's guarenteed that WW will endorse Novick in the May primary -- they haven't written one word of criticism of Novick, or delved into his personal life.
Perhaps WW should make the same offer to Merkley they gave to Novick, and let Merkley have a cover feature with photos, and several pages inside to lay out who he is and why he's running against Gordon Smith. Instead of this sophomoric, sloppy journalism, we'd at least get a fair shot of hearing what Merkley is all about. How about it Mark Zusman? Have you got the guts? I'd like an answer right here, please.
Readers of WW: if you want a fair hearing for both candidates for U.S. Senate in the Democratic May primary, let the editor of WW know.
Somewhere back in DC, riding around in his collection of Ferraris, in his French designer suits, with his million dollar golf clubs, and his $4.4 million in campaign cash in the bank, Gordon Smith must be laughing his head off at Portland's "progressive" newspaper.