Friday, February 03
 

Finder Restaurant Cheap Eats Drink Devour
 
 
April 30th, 2008 WW Editorial Staff | Special Section
 

President

Democrat

70 Comments
     
Tags:

IMAGE: Vivian Johnson

Sen. Barack Obama


It’s probable that no endorsement we make will have less influence than this one.

Who among you registered D’s hasn’t thought long and hard about how to undo the blight that has been the Bush administration? Who hasn’t watched the debates between Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. Hillary Clinton, followed the horse race and developed a gut feeling about who will best remove the tumor that has metastasized in the White House over the past seven years?

With all due respect to those who think Clinton is the best surgeon for our times, we’re throwing our weight behind a different kind of healer, one who brings more than a smart set of policies, but rather a wholesale—yes, we’ll say it—change in approach. Don’t count us among the dewy-eyed who are infatuated with Obama and have conferred upon him celestial qualities: He is not divine. But do count us among those who believe he can inspire the best in each of us, begin to realign America’s international image, restore our civil liberties and expel the criminals and plunderers that have had an all-access pass to the White House since 2001.

To those with reservations about the freshman Illinois senator’s inexperience—we only point to his campaign’s remarkable dexterity and management. To those who think he may not be tough enough—consider that he has been tested and vetted by the political equivalent of the thuggish Detroit Pistons. The Clintons have a long history of cheating, lying and throwing every available elbow to win. Obama has met every Clinton challenge and risen above it. Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad would be a pussycat compared to the tenacity and wily nature of the Clintons.

There’s not much daylight between Clinton and Obama on most issues, including Oregon-specific ones. (The Clinton campaign has made much of Obama’s vote in favor of the Bush administration’s 2005 Energy Policy Act, which Clinton says robbed local and state governments of their say in liquefied natural gas projects. Obama in turn touts the work he did to improve the bill, inserting provisions to promote green power and energy independence.)

But this isn’t really about specific issues. It’s about character, the ability to motivate, the skill to restore our position overseas and the wisdom to speak to us as adults about the challenges we face as, well, adults. Obama has demonstrated all of these talents during the campaign, and we’re throwing our lot in with him. We hope this state’s Democrats do so as well.

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
04.30.2008 at 04:32 Reply
Ret
I think his "former" pastor just took Obama out of the race. Whether you agree with Wright or not, it was a distraction at a time when Obama needed it least. I'd be willing to bet that along with his "typical white person" and "God and guns" remarks are going to derail him. Young people won't be terribly affected, but remarks like that along with Wright's antics piss off a lot of older folks. Personally, as an older man, I think that's a shame. Clinton is bright, etc., but neither her nor Bill have much of a moral compass, particularly when it comes to money and self indulgence.

 

04.30.2008 at 05:07 Reply
Ret may be right about Wright pissing off older folks, but I think rational minds (young and old) will prevail and recognize that Obama had done everything conceivably appropriate to distance himself from somebody he once was friendly with. I think it's outrageous that John McCain can accept the endorsement of an anti-Catholic, anti-Muslim, anti-gay, pro-apocalypse pastor like John Hagee and then the greater media hardly blinks. The absurdist efforts by some to keep linking Obama to Wright is misleading, unfair, and just plain mean.

 

04.30.2008 at 06:00 Reply
Ret
Jason,

Hagee isn't trying to grab the limelight like Wright is. Besides, the Republican primaries are over for all intent and purposes. That stuff will be raised in the general election. But with Obama and Clinton still fighting, everything is fair game right now. And realistically, the media has been pretty kind to Obama.

And unfortunately, rational minds aren't the only ones voting. My experience over the years is that although every candidate has some enthusiastic supporters, a lot of voters tend to vote against various candidates rather than for them.... Rarely is there anyone running who inspires a majority and most voters go for the person that annoys them the least.

Frankly, none of the three bring that much to the table. Obama talks about change, but rarely offers specifics on anything. People are drawn to that rhetoric without knowing what he plans to do. Granted, at this point he looks to be the least harmful.

 

04.30.2008 at 06:24 Reply
You said what I'd been saying my friends privately. It is the character that Obama brings when decked against the Clintons. The Clintons have perfected the dirty art of politics and they are the epitome of win-at-all-costs with below-the-belt blows typical of the Wahington beltway. Now Obama is framed within the Wright lens. So, those of you who count on experience are perhaps looking through this glass.

After all, isn't Jimmy Carter trashed for talking with Syria and Hamas? Obama represents that kind of change that Washington and frankly the people who are "believers" in the business-as-usual policies and politics abhor to think of.

Perhaps America is decades behind electing change from the norm and only ready to send the mafia who will lay out time-tested-and-failed-policies in refurbished bills and vetoes.

 

04.30.2008 at 06:33 Reply
I agree with Jason; I don't trust the Clintons (yes, I know Hillary is the one running. I will vote for Obama and i really don't think the preacher's words were to be taken seriously. i think the media is latching on to that and blowing it up unneccsarily(sorry can't spell today).

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close