Tuesday, February 14

Sam Adams is on Yelp

News The other day I noticed a curious tweet from our venerable mayor's Twitter account:Yes, Sam is tweet... More

Feb 13, 2012 01:20 pm by RUTH BROWN  | Comments 1
 

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 4
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 1
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 3
 
 
 
August 6th, 2008 WW's Beloved Readers | Letters to the Editor
 

Inbox

3 Comments
     
Tags:

What are we really fighting for?
Mary Kit Hogan’s recent letter [Inbox, July 30, 2008] expressed opposition to Portland offering sanctuary to military deserters, on the grounds that they are volunteers who have broken their word. While on balance I don’t agree with this position, it does have some merit and is at least worthy of debate. However, I do wish to challenge one of her wilder and more tangential statements.

Ms. Hogan asserts that “Every freedom we enjoy in this country has come from the sacrifice and blood of the military.” Did she learn and accept this rubbish in grade school? Regardless of where this idea comes from, it does not stand up well to examination.

The last time the military secured/established a freedom for Americans was in 1865, but they haven’t bothered much with that sort of thing since then. All subsequent wars have been fought abroad and involved no risk of a foreign power conquering and subjugating the American people. Moreover, it is unlikely that “the blood and sacrifice of the military” have made much of a contribution to the religious, sexual or social freedoms enjoyed today by the inhabitants of this country.

Conservative estimates put last year’s defense budget in the region of 550 billion dollars, while federal receipts excluding social security were about 1300 billion. Other developed countries, unburdened by huge standing armies, have the freedom to spend their taxes on education and healthcare.
Liam Loftus
Southeast Division Street

Accountability, not cash
Those individuals who hope that Mr. Sharma wins a large settlement against Vancouver [“Good Cop, Mad Cop,” WW, July 30, 2008], I would like to remind you that cities pay their rewards with your tax dollars.

No person should be punished for having integrity but those who do not share the same morals will seek to do so. The best choice would be to remove yourself from their sphere of influence, which Mr. Sharma did not do.

Not only has he been punished for his actions but the people of Vancouver will be punished as well if he wins a large settlement. Cash may be an answer, but it has far-reaching ramifications. I hope all police departments can learn a bit about being more aware about their role in the embodiment of integrity.

I also hope that Mr. Sharma writes a book that could become a source of economic reimbursement rather than taking the money of the people of Vancouver.

By all means win the case but ask for accountability instead of cash. They are not the same thing as so many people may believe.

“Bryan”
via wweek.com


WW welcomes letters to the editor via mail, email or fax. Letters must be signed by the author and include the author’s street address and phone number for verification. Letters must be 250 or fewer words.

Submit to:2220 NW Quimby St., Portland, OR 97210.
Fax: (503) 243-1115
Email: mzusman@wweek.com

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
08.06.2008 at 02:38 Reply
"The last time the military secured/established a freedom for Americans was in 1865"

Did you learn and accept this rubbish in grade school? Regardless of where this idea comes from, it does not stand up well to examination.

Look up the word "reconstruction"

 

08.09.2008 at 10:54 Reply
Are you serious?? To say that this country was NOT based on and enabled to be EXISTING due to the blood and sacrifice of the military is INSANE. As they said in World War II, "loose lips sink ships"...Had we the protesters during that war that we have now, we'd all be speaking German and Japanese, and most likely we'd all be white with blonde hair and blue eyes. Before that even, had we not had the minutemen firing the first shot for the Revolutionary war, we'd all still be "Tories". Before we all go on another diatribe on how the government and military are these evil entities, maybe we should thank them for allowing us to have the freedom to dissent.

 

08.09.2008 at 11:04 Reply
To say that we need to give sanctuary for military deserters is ridiculous. The reason for these people deserting is nothing more that they enlisted in times of peace to pay for college and never anticipated that they would ever have to go to war. Guess what. You reaped the benefits of the military, now you have to pay up. In past years, the penalty for deserting was at the very least a court martial with dishonorable discharge and prison time. In some more severe cases, like TREASON, death. I support the solidiers who do fight in Iraq, Afghanistan and other hostile countries because they CHOOSE to serve their country, and unlike what the public perception seems to be, there is NO DRAFT IN PLACE. Before we start waving our banners around in protest, maybe we should take those minor details into consideration...and think, without those who bravely fight for our country, we wouldn't have the freedom or right to protest. So again, punish the deserters for what they are,...cowards...don't offer them sanctuary.

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close