Tuesday, February 14

Sam Adams is on Yelp

News The other day I noticed a curious tweet from our venerable mayor's Twitter account:Yes, Sam is tweet... More

Feb 13, 2012 01:20 pm by RUTH BROWN  | Comments 1
 

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 4
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 1
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 4
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · News · The Tragic 8 Pall
November 19th, 2008 Mariah Summers | News
 

The Tragic 8 Pall

One more thing from California for Oregonians to object to: Prop 8.

3 Comments
     
Tags:
PROPOSITION OPPOSITION: Hundreds gathered Nov. 15 in the Park Blocks to demonstrate against Prop. 8.
IMAGE: meghan holmes

Oregon voters in 2004 passed Measure 36, which banned same-sex marriage in the state. California voters inflicted similar wounds this month to gay couples in their state with Proposition 8.

And Saturday, Nov. 15, several hundred Portlanders gathered in the Park Blocks as part of a nationwide protest against Proposition 8, which is being challenged in California’s Supreme Court by the American Civil Liberties Union and gay rights groups.

Many of the local demonstrators said they’d hoped California, which started allowing same-sex marriages in May 2008, would remain a nearby option if they wanted to go beyond the domestic partnerships in effect in Oregon.

In one example of the advantage of marriage over domestic partnership, domestic partners aren’t entitled to Social Security survivor benefits, as are marital spouses.

Demonstrators Katie Boeh and Nicole Sangsuree-Barrett, both 28, are engaged and had planned to get married in California some time next year.

“It was really disappointing,” Sangsuree-Barrett said of Prop 8. “I think straight people take marriage for granted. I’ve just accepted, since I started dating women, that I can’t get married. Straight people, I don’t think, realize that it’s a choice [for them to get married]. For me, I don’t have that option.”

At least not anymore in California, where 52 percent of voters approved Prop 8 in the Nov. 4 election.

To Boeh, that’s the most upsetting part.

“The most unfortunate thing is the flip-flopping,” Boeh said. “Granting rights and taking them away, it really leaves folks hopeless and gives people no sense of stability.”

Among the speakers at the nearly four-hour protest was Mayor-elect Sam Adams, whose turn at the megaphone sparked a roar from the crowd and a chant of “Yes we can!”

“They said this ban is about marriage,” Adams yelled. “But it’s really about respect!”

See a slide show of the protest below:


FACT: In 2007, the Oregon Legislature passed Senate Bill 1000, which allowed domestic partnerships in the state.
 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
11.19.2008 at 01:12 Reply
An update: http://wweek.com/wwire/?p=16418

 

11.20.2008 at 02:36 Reply
Attempts to redefine marriage reveals the true goal of gay activists is to undermine the family as the building block of society. They know full well their lifestyle is not the norm. Despite this, they continually foist it on the community through schools and government as identical to marriage and family when it isn't. They know this as does everyone else. That's why it's never going to replace marriage. The lady doth protest too much, methinks.

 

11.22.2008 at 10:22 Reply
What people like Look Now want to ignore is that marriage has continued to be redefined over and over. As recent as 1967 it became legal for interracial couples to marry. They know it has nothing to do with defining marriage or families. If it were they'd be working to ban divorce and ban single heterosexuals from adopting children. Your marriage and your family will never be affected by mine and you know it. Marginalizing a minority group you hate will not make them go away. You can't legislate them away and you know it. You think we're done? Just wait until we show up to protest in front of bigoted churches and at weddings of political officials and their families who push their hate agenda on everyone else.

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close