Tuesday, February 14

Sam Adams is on Yelp

News The other day I noticed a curious tweet from our venerable mayor's Twitter account:Yes, Sam is tweet... More

Feb 13, 2012 01:20 pm by RUTH BROWN  | Comments 1
 

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 4
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 1
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 4
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · News · A Mess With Taxes
November 26th, 2008 NIGEL JAQUISS | News
 

A Mess With Taxes

How can Oregon give a $10 million tax break to a company whose affiliate may owe taxpayers $20 million?

5 Comments
     
Tags:

IMAGE: Lukas Ketner

At a time when Oregon faces a billion-dollar budget deficit, state officials are handing out tax credits to at least one company whose affiliate left taxpayers holding the bag for an estimated $20 million mining disaster.

The director of a local mining watchdog group says that’s bad environmental and economic policy.

“It just doesn’t make any sense to me that we’re giving what amounts to general fund dollars to a company that effectively cost taxpayers tens of millions,” says Larry Tuttle, director of the Center for Environmental Equity.

Tax-credit critics such as Jody Wiser of Tax Fairness Oregon say Tuttle is absolutely right.

“The problem is we’re saying ‘yes’ to tax credit applicants without asking whether what we’re doing makes sense and acting as if we don’t have the power to stop things,” Wiser says.

Lou Torres, spokesman for the Oregon Department of Energy, which runs the tax credit program, says his agency lacks the resources to conduct a background investigation of tax-credit applicants. Nor, Torres says, is a check required by law.

“What we’re paying attention to is whether the company is a viable owner, whether they’ve proposed a viable project and whether the project saves or produces the energy it’s supposed to,” Torres says. “We don’t have the capacity to do a background investigation.”

The issue arose earlier this year when the Energy Department awarded Marubeni Sustainable Energy Inc., a subsidiary of the Japanese conglomerate Marubeni Corp., a $20 million business energy tax credit for a project in Lakeview that will turn wood waste from a nearby sawmill in the south-central Oregon town into energy.

Such credits are a result of a 2007 state law that sweetened Oregon’s already generous tax credit program, allowing beneficiaries to get credits for half their investment.

So Marubeni can avoid the payment of $10 million in taxes over the next five years, or it can sell the credits to another company that needs them.

One of the purposes of the enhanced tax credit program was to make it easier for Oregon to comply with another law passed by the 2007 Legislature requiring 25 percent of the electricity consumed here to be produced from renewable sources by the year 2025.

But neither law contains provisions disqualifying a company that may have otherwise harmed the environment by its actions.

In Marubeni’s case, Tuttle says, that’s a shame, because, according to a 2006 Eugene Register-Guard story, Marubeni financed a Canadian company—Formosa Exploration Inc.—whose activities created an environmental mess in southwestern Oregon.

In 1990, Formosa Exploration opened the Silver Butte Mine, a source of copper, zinc and thorium, near Riddle in Douglas County.

In 1994, Formosa ceased mining, according to Department of Environmental Quality records. The company began to clean up the site but declared bankruptcy in 1997, leaving taxpayers on the hook for any ensuing problems.

DEQ officials soon discovered Formosa’s attempted cleanup, or “reclamation,” was a failure.

Here’s the latest description from the federal Environmental Protection Agency, which in 2007 listed the mine as one of Oregon’s 12 Superfund sites.

“Stormwater-driven contaminant releases from the mine have led to an annual discharge of approximately 5 million gallons of acid rock drainage, containing up to 30,000 pounds of dissolved copper and zinc along with other metals,” according to the 2007 EPA report. “Heavy metals concentrations in Middle Creek and the South Fork, and into Cow Creek, exceed aquatic life standards.”

The waters used to be “prime habitat for steelhead and coho salmon,” according to a 2004 Oregon DEQ report, but 18 miles of streams that eventually feed into the South Umpqua River, one of the state’s top fishing and rafting resources, are now heavily polluted.

Before turning the site over to the EPA, the Oregon DEQ spent $1.7 million on site investigation and cleanup.

Denise Baker-Kircher, EPA’s project manager for the mine, says EPA lawyers are investigating Marubeni’s level of responsibility and recently got several boxes of documents—all in Japanese. “All we know right now is the cleanup will be very expensive,” says Baker-Kircher—maybe $20 million or more. (A Marubeni representative was unavailable for comment.)

Other mining states, such as Colorado and Montana, have “bad actor” laws that prevent companies from applying for benefits such as tax credits before they resolve previous liabilities, Tuttle says.

“We’ve got clearinghouses to check for conflicts in other areas in Oregon,” he adds. “This case just makes me wonder if we’re in such a hurry to grant tax credits to anybody who says they’re ‘green’ that we’re not asking enough questions.”


FACT: Business energy tax credits pay out over five years. Earlier this year, the Oregon Department of Energy projected the credits would cost taxpayers $25.2 million over the next two years, but ODE spokesman Lou Torres now says that total will be “substantially higher.”
 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
11.26.2008 at 05:39 Reply
Another example of Weak Sisters in Salem, getting all the EEO, CEOs, and fat chicks working in salem, do nothing about the real world, ... ...

What About the Fish, The health of the River, Salem = Stupid people, Inbreeds in government, Hire your cousin, brother, and look at the outcome, Japan gets us back after WWII, stick it to the dumb people of Oregon Inbreeds, Why are we letting them do this? Weak, Very Weak indeed, This Makes me sick just reading this, ... However this is probably Par for the course when it comes to mining and Tax Credits, and whats this about selling the tax credit, this is another fine example of ignate people like Piggy Flowers at PGE.

 

11.27.2008 at 07:57 Reply
"At a time when Oregon faces a billion-dollar budget deficit,"

but the state budget is still increasing next biennium, right?

"Overall, the state's general fund budget will still grow over the next two years but not by as much as officials had been expecting. The forecast pegs state discretionary spending for 2009-11 at $16.1 billion. That would be an increase of about 7 percent -- or 3.5 percent a year -- from current spending levels."

Wish my revenue was increasing 3.5% a year......

 

11.27.2008 at 08:52 Reply
Yes, the total amount of money available is increasing every biennium - and has increased every biennium since the early 1980s. However, if there isn't enough to pay the exorbitant increases in salaries and benefits of government workers - like the 24 percent salary increases the Governor recently gave State Managers - then it's a "cut." See how that works?

 

11.27.2008 at 09:06 Reply
The Tax credit and renewable laws are a scam generally speaking. They allow the upper middle class to buy their solar photovoltaic systems which most folks can't afford even after tax credits. Solar photovoltaics and such were uneconomical in the last energy crisis of the 70s and they continue to be so even today.

Besides, renewable mandates are government over-regulation. The government already regulates power plant emissions and utility rates. These latter regs should be enough to fix the externalities of conventional energy systems.

The government is not very good at picking winners and losers in the market place. For example, ethanol costs more than gasoline, and I am not sure the environmental benefits are that much superior.

 

11.30.2008 at 02:06 Reply
What people we elected to state office are going to do something about this?

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close