Monday, February 13

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 3
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 1
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 2
 

Almost Live: Rockets at Blazers

News So I'm having a bit of trouble with the picture, which is coming from my phone (I drew it on my way ... More

Feb 8, 2012 07:09 pm by CASEY JARMAN  | Comments 0
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · Rogue of the Week · Associated Creditors Exchange
November 26th, 2008 WW Editorial Staff | Rogue of the Week
 

Associated Creditors Exchange

Chasing a debt to the ends of the Earth.

16 Comments
     
Tags:

Families of troops in Iraq have enough fear and stress this holiday season without debt collectors adding illegal scare tactics. For allegedly harassing a soldier’s family over unpaid bills, we’re giving a dishonorable discharge to Associated Creditors Exchange, this week’s Rogue.

A federal lawsuit filed Oct. 29 in Eugene claims the collection agency repeatedly called the Springfield home of the mother and stepfather of Brian Gunderson, a 31-year-old U.S. Army sergeant now deployed in Iraq.

According to the lawsuit, the phone calls began in April in an attempt to collect on a loan Gunderson took out to buy a Nissan pickup. The calls continued after the couple told the company to cease contacting them, the lawsuit says.

In June 2008, the lawsuit says, the Phoenix-based company called to say they could contact Gunderson’s commanding officer who would “rough him up, since soldiers are not to leave on deployment in debt.”

Major Michael Braibish, spokesman for the Oregon National Guard, says many combat troops are in debt and it’s not against any rules. He adds that soldiers are often the victims of predatory debt collectors.

“A commanding officer is not gonna rough up his troops over financial issues,” Braibish says. “They want that troop focused on the mission.”

The suit, filed by Salem lawyer Keith Karnes, seeks unspecified damages for alleged violations of state and federal debt-collection laws.

Despite being a company that makes its living phoning for debts, Associated Creditors Exchange did not return a phone call seeking comment.

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
11.26.2008 at 10:29 Reply
Iraqi civilians dead: 89k-97k

http://www.iraqbodycount.org/

Predatory collection agency: 1

Killing brownies while in debt for a pickup truck: priceless.

 

11.26.2008 at 11:50 Reply
Ed
ACE may have violated Oregon law by continuing to call after being told not to. That's an enforcment issue. Not such a big deal. I'm sure they were rude and threatening. That's the nature of the beast. Again, not such a big deal. Bottom line is, Gunderson has an outstanding debt and there's no law in place to defer it because he's in Iraq. Maybe there should be. But how any of the Gundersons can receive "unspecified damages" out of this is strange. What damages?

 

11.26.2008 at 03:43 Reply
Ed
It would also be a violation of federal law for the creditor to contact this soldier's commanding officer as it is illegal to share information regarding someone's debt with a third party including parents, roommates, employers, etc. This includes leaving messages on voicemail citing the debt due to the inability of the caller to know who will be retrieving the voicemails.

 

12.01.2008 at 09:25 Reply
Ed,

You should read the law concerning debt collections before you post.

The article states that ACE was calling his parents and they asked them not to call back again which ACE did repeatedly. That is against the law. Even the person they are collecting from can tell them to stop calling and they have to or they are breaking the law. The key here is that they were not calling the debtor but his parents.

 

12.02.2008 at 01:01 Reply
Ed
wrnchbndr, you're arguing with yourself. Why?

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close